China's environmental "fee-to-tax" and foreign direct investment-An empirical study based on intensity difference-in-differences

被引:4
作者
Huang, Jiqiang [1 ]
Li, Yanfeng [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhongnan Univ Econ & Law, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Hunan Univ Finance & Econ, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家社会科学基金;
关键词
China's environmental "Fee-to-Tax; FDI; pollution halo; Porter hypothesis; intensity difference-in-differences; FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; NATURAL EXPERIMENT; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; FDI INFLOWS; QUALITY; PANEL; MEDIATION; POLICIES; TRADE;
D O I
10.3389/fenvs.2023.978388
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
To protect and improve the environment, reduce pollutant emissions, and promote ecological civilization, China implemented "the Environmental Protection Law of the People's Republic of China" on 1 January 2018. However, what is the impact of strict environmental regulation on foreign direct investment (FDI)? The study uses the data from 287 cities in 30 of China's provinces between 2003 and 2019 and constructs an intensity difference-in-difference model to test the impact of China's environmental "fee-to-tax" on FDI. Empirical results show that environmental "fee-to-tax" significantly boosts FDI. The "pollution halo" hypothesis is confirmed, and the findings hold up through robustness tests. In addition, the heterogeneity test found that environmental "fee-to-tax" mainly promoted FDI in the eastern and central regions but not significantly in the western regions. Further expansion found that environmental "fee-to-tax" can effectively reduce the emission of pollutants. The results provide important policy implications for deepening the environmental protection tax reform and optimizing FDI.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [11] The moderating effect of institutions in foreign direct investment led growth hypothesis in Nigeria
    Dada, James Temitope
    Abanikanda, Ezekiel Olamide
    [J]. ECONOMIC CHANGE AND RESTRUCTURING, 2022, 55 (02) : 903 - 929
  • [12] Environmental Regulation: An Incentive for Foreign Direct Investment
    Dijkstra, Bouwe R.
    Mathew, Anuj Joshua
    Mukherjee, Arijit
    [J]. REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 19 (03) : 568 - 578
  • [13] Environmental regulation and foreign direct investment: Evidence from China's outward FDI
    Dong, Yan
    Tian, Jinhuan
    Ye, Jingjing
    [J]. FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 39
  • [14] Pollution haven or pollution halo? A Re-evaluation on the role of multinational enterprises in global CO2 emissions
    Duan, Yuwan
    Jiang, Xuemei
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2021, 97
  • [15] The role of exogenous technological factors and renewable energy in carbon dioxide emission reduction in Sub-Saharan Africa
    Edziah, Bless Kofi
    Sun, Huaping
    Adom, Philip Kofi
    Wang, Feng
    Agyemang, Andrew Osei
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2022, 196 : 1418 - 1428
  • [16] Heterogeneous impacts of environmental regulation on foreign direct investment: do environmental regulation affect FDI decisions?
    Fahad, Shah
    Bai, Dongbei
    Liu, Lingcai
    Baloch, Zulfiqar Ali
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (04) : 5092 - 5104
  • [17] Effects of environmental regulation and FDI on urban innovation in China: A spatial Durbin econometric analysis
    Feng, Yanchao
    Wang, Xiaohong
    Du, Wenchao
    Wu, Hongyu
    Wang, Jintao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 235 : 210 - 224
  • [18] Trade liberalization, FDI inflows, environmental quality and economic growth: A comparative analysis between Tunisia and Morocco
    Hakimi, Abdelaziz
    Hamdi, Hemi
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 58 : 1445 - 1456
  • [19] US Environmental Regulation and FDI: Evidence from a Panel of US-Based Multinational Firms
    Hanna, Rema
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2010, 2 (03) : 158 - 189
  • [20] Foreign direct investment and regional innovation: Evidence from China
    Jiang, Haiwei
    Liang, Yousha
    Pan, Shiyuan
    [J]. WORLD ECONOMY, 2022, 45 (06) : 1876 - 1909