The effects of first-line pharmacological treatments for reproductive outcomes in infertile women with PCOS: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

被引:8
作者
Peng, Ge [1 ,2 ]
Yan, Zhe [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Yuqi [1 ,2 ]
Li, Juan [1 ,2 ]
Ma, Jinfang [1 ,2 ]
Tong, Nanwei [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Yan [3 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Endocrinol & Metab, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Ctr Diabet & Metab Res, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, West China Univ Hosp 2nd, Dept Gynaecol & Obstet, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
关键词
Polycystic ovarian syndrome; Infertility; Pharmacological treatment; Network meta-analysis; POLYCYSTIC-OVARY-SYNDROME; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; CLOMIPHENE CITRATE; OVULATION INDUCTION; INSULIN-RESISTANCE; METFORMIN; EFFICACY; PIOGLITAZONE; PREGNANCY; LETROZOLE;
D O I
10.1186/s12958-023-01075-9
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) is one of the most common causes of infertility in reproductive-age women. However, the efficacy and optimal therapeutic strategy for reproductive outcomes are still under debate. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of different first-line pharmacological therapies in terms of reproductive outcomes for women with PCOS and infertility. Methods A systematic retrieval of databases was conducted, and randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of pharmacological interventions for infertile PCOS women were included. The primary outcomes were clinical pregnancy and live birth, and the secondary outcomes were miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy and multiple pregnancy. A network meta-analysis based on a Bayesian model was performed to compare the effects of the pharmacological strategies. Results A total of 27 RCTs with 12 interventions were included, and all therapies tended to increase clinical pregnancy, especially pioglitazone (PIO) (log OR 3.14, 95% CI 1.56 similar to 4.70, moderate confidence), clomiphene citrate (CC) + exenatide (EXE) (2.96, 1.07 similar to 4.82, moderate confidence) and CC + metformin (MET) + PIO (2.82, 0.99 similar to 4.60, moderate confidence). Moreover, CC + MET + PIO (2.8, -0.25 similar to 6.06, very low confidence) could increase live birth most when compared to placebo, even without a significant difference. For secondary outcomes, PIO showed a tendency to increase miscarriage (1.44, -1.69 similar to 5.28, very low confidence). MET (-11.25, -33.7 similar to 0.57, low confidence) and LZ + MET (-10.44, -59.56 similar to 42.11, very low confidence) were beneficial for decreasing ectopic pregnancy. MET (0.07, -4.26 similar to 4.34, low confidence) showed a neutral effect in multiple pregnancy. Subgroup analysis demonstrated no significant difference between these medications and placebo in obese participants. Conclusions Most first-line pharmacological treatments were effective in improving clinical pregnancy. CC + MET + PIO should be recommended as the optimal therapeutic strategy to improve pregnancy outcomes. However, none of the above treatments had a beneficial effect on clinical pregnancy in obese PCOS.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [1] Health Effects of Overweight and Obesity in 195 Countries over 25 Years
    Afshin, Ashkan
    Forouzanfar, Mohammad H.
    Reitsma, Marissa B.
    Sur, Patrick
    Estep, Kara
    Lee, Alex
    Marczak, Laurie
    Mokdad, Ali H.
    Moradi-Lakeh, Maziar
    Naghavi, Mohsen
    Salama, Joseph S.
    Vos, Theo
    Abate, Kalkidan H.
    Abbafati, Cristiana
    Ahmed, Muktar B.
    Al-Aly, Ziyad
    Alkerwi, Ala'a
    Al-Raddadi, Rajaa
    Amare, Azmeraw T.
    Amberbir, Alemayehu
    Amegah, Adeladza K.
    Amini, Erfan
    Amrock, Stephen M.
    Anjana, Ranjit M.
    Arnlov, Johan
    Asayesh, Hamid
    Banerjee, Amitava
    Barac, Aleksandra
    Baye, Estifanos
    Bennett, Derrick A.
    Beyene, Addisu S.
    Biadgilign, Sibhatu
    Biryukov, Stan
    Bjertness, Espen
    Boneya, Dube J.
    Campos-Nonato, Ismael
    Carrero, Juan J.
    Cecilio, Pedro
    Cercy, Kelly
    Ciobanu, Liliana G.
    Cornaby, Leslie
    Damtew, Solomon A.
    Dandona, Lalit
    Dandona, Rakhi
    Dharmaratne, Samath D.
    Duncan, Bruce B.
    Eshrati, Babak
    Esteghamati, Alireza
    Feigin, Valery L.
    Fernandes, Joao C.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2017, 377 (01) : 13 - 27
  • [2] Double-blind randomized controlled trial of letrozole versus clomiphene citrate in subfertile women with polycystic ovarian syndrome
    Amer, S. A.
    Smith, J.
    Mahran, A.
    Fox, P.
    Fakis, A.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2017, 32 (08) : 1631 - 1638
  • [3] Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
    Legro, Richard S.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 131 (06) : E157 - E171
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2013, Fertility: Assessment and Treatment for People with Fertility Problems
  • [5] Anwar A., 2016, Acta Medica Intl, V3, P88, DOI [10.5530/ami.2016.2.19, DOI 10.5530/AMI.2016.2.19]
  • [6] Ayaz A, 2013, J Med Life, V6, P199
  • [7] Letrozole versus clomiphene citrate for ovulation induction in anovulatory women with polycystic ovarian syndrome: A randomized controlled trial
    Bansal, Shavina
    Goyal, Manu
    Sharma, Charu
    Shekhar, Shashank
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2021, 152 (03) : 345 - 350
  • [8] General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations
    Brooks, SP
    Gelman, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND GRAPHICAL STATISTICS, 1998, 7 (04) : 434 - 455
  • [9] Obesity, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, and Infertility: A New Avenue for GLP-1 Receptor Agonists
    Cena, Hellas
    Chiovato, Luca
    Nappi, Rossella E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2020, 105 (08) : E2695 - E2709
  • [10] Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 2: A Generalized Linear Modeling Framework for Pairwise and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Dias, Sofia
    Sutton, Alex J.
    Ades, A. E.
    Welton, Nicky J.
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2013, 33 (05) : 607 - 617