Targeted intervention to achieve waste reduction in gastrointestinal endoscopy

被引:27
作者
Cunha Neves, Joao A. [1 ,2 ]
Roseira, Joana [1 ,2 ]
Queiros, Patricia [1 ,2 ]
Sousa, Helena Tavares [1 ,2 ]
Pellino, Gianluca [3 ,4 ]
Cunha, Miguel F. [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Algarve Univ Hosp Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol, Portimao, Portugal
[2] Univ Algarve, ABC Algarve Biomed Ctr, Faro, Portugal
[3] Univ Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Dept Adv Med & Surg Sci, Naples, Italy
[4] Vall dHebron Univ Hosp, Dept Colorectal Surg, Barcelona, Spain
[5] Algarve Univ Hosp Ctr, Dept Gen Surg, Colorectal Dis Grp, Portimao, Portugal
关键词
endoscopy; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT; CARBON FOOTPRINT;
D O I
10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327005
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective Endoscopy is healthcare's third largest generator of medical waste in hospitals. This prospective study aimed to measure a single unit's waste carbon footprint and perform a pioneer intervention towards a more sustainable endoscopy practice. The relation of regulated medical waste (RMW; material fully contaminated with blood or body fluids or containing infectious agents) versus landfill waste (non-recyclable material not fully contaminated) may play a critical role. Design In a four-stage prospective study, following a 4-week observational audit with daily weighing of both waste types (stage 1), stage 2 consisted of a 1-week intervention with team education of waste handling. Recycling bins were placed in endoscopy rooms, landfill and RMW bins were relocated. During stages 3 (1 month after intervention) and 4 (4 months after intervention), daily endoscopic waste was weighed. Equivalence of 1 kg of landfill waste to 1 kg carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) and 1 kg of RMW to 3kgCO(2e) was assumed. Paired samples t-tests for comparisons. Results From stage 1 to stage 3, mean total waste and RMW were reduced by 12.9% (p=0.155) and 41.4% (p=0.010), respectively, whereas landfill (p=0.059) and recycling waste increased (paper: p=0.001; plastic: p=0.007). While mean endoscopy load was similar (46.2 vs 44.5, p=0.275), a total decrease of CO2e by 31.6% (138.8kgCO(2e)) was found (mean kgCO(2e)109.7 vs 74.9, p=0.018). The annual reduction was calculated at 1665.6kgCO(2e). All these effects were sustained 4 months after the intervention (stage 4) without objections by responsible endoscopy personnel. Conclusion In this interventional study, applying sustainability measures to a real-world scenario, RMW reduction and daily recycling were achieved and sustained over time, without compromising endoscopy productivity.
引用
收藏
页码:306 / 313
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Disposal of Endoscopic Accessories After Use Do We Know and Do We Care?
    Agrawal, Deepak
    Shoup, Valerie
    Montgomery, Amy
    Wosik, Jedrek
    Rockey, Don C.
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY NURSING, 2017, 40 (01) : 13 - 18
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2016, GREENH GAS EQ CALC
  • [3] Resuming endoscopy during COVID-19 pandemic: ESGE, WED and WGO Joint Cascade Guideline for Resource Limited Settings
    Antonelli, Giulio
    Karsensten, John Gasdal
    Bhat, Purnima
    Ijoma, Uchenna
    Osuagwu, Chukwuemeka
    Desalegn, Hailemichael
    Abera, Hanna
    Guy, Claire
    Vilmann, Peter
    Dinis-Ribeiro, Mario
    Ponchon, Thierry
    Sabbagh, Luis Carlos
    Pausawasdi, Nonthalee
    Makharia, Govind
    Hassan, Cesare
    Veitch, Andrew
    Aabakken, Lars
    Ebigbo, Alanna
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2021, 09 (04) : E543 - E551
  • [4] The Environmental Impact of Interventional Radiology: An Evaluation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from an Academic Interventional Radiology Practice
    Chua, Anthony Luis B.
    Amin, Ruhana
    Zhang, Jinchun
    Thiel, Cassandra L.
    Gross, Jonathan S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 32 (06) : 907 - +
  • [5] Carbon Footprint in Flexible Ureteroscopy: A Comparative Study on the Environmental Impact of Reusable and Single-Use Ureteroscopes
    Davis, Niall F.
    McGrath, Shannon
    Quinlan, Mark
    Jack, Gregory
    Lawrentschuk, Nathan
    Bolton, Damien M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2018, 32 (03) : 214 - 217
  • [6] Packaging and Waste in the Endoscopy Suite
    de Melo, Silvio W., Jr.
    Taylor, Gordon L.
    Kao, John Y.
    [J]. TECHNIQUES AND INNOVATIONS IN GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2021, 23 (04): : 371 - 375
  • [7] Environmental Protection Agency,, REC COMM REC, P2021
  • [8] Environmental Impact of Endoscopy: "Scope" of the Problem
    Gayam, Swapna
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 115 (12) : 1931 - 1932
  • [9] Coming round to recycling
    Hutchins, David C. J.
    White, Stuart M.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 338
  • [10] Maurice JB, 2020, LANCET GASTROENTEROL, V5, P636, DOI 10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30157-6