Digital Health and Community Health Worker Support for Diabetes Management: a Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:8
作者
Whitehouse, Christina R. [1 ,2 ]
Knowles, Molly [3 ,4 ]
Long, Judith A. [3 ,7 ]
Mitra, Nandita [6 ]
Volpp, Kevin G. [3 ,5 ]
Xu, Chang [3 ]
Sabini, Carolyn [3 ,4 ]
Gerald, Norma [4 ]
Estrada, Irene [4 ]
Jones, Denerale [4 ]
Kangovi, Shreya [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Villanova Univ, M Louise Fitzpatrick Coll Nursing, 800 E Lancaster Ave, Villanova, PA 19085 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Clin Practices, Penn Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Univ Penn, Dept Med, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] Univ Penn, Penn Ctr Community Hlth Workers, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[5] Univ Penn, Ctr Hlth Incent & Behav Econ, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[6] Univ Penn, Dept Biostat Epidemiol & Informat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[7] Corporal Michael J Crescenz VA Med Ctr, Ctr Hlth Equ Res & Promot, Philadelphia, PA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
diabetes; self-monitoring; digital health; community health worker; randomized trials; INTERVENTIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-022-07639-6
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a digital health intervention plus community health worker (CHW) support on self-monitoring of blood glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) among adult Medicaid beneficiaries with diabetes. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. Setting: Urban outpatient clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Adult Medicaid beneficiaries living with diabetes and treated with insulin and who had a HbA1c >= 9%. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomly assigned to one of three arms. Participants in the usual-care arm received a wireless glucometer if needed. Those in the digital arm received a lottery incentive for daily glucose monitoring. Those in the hybrid arm received the lottery plus support from a CHW if they had low adherence or high blood glucose levels. MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome was the difference in adherence to daily glucose self-monitoring at 3 months between the hybrid and usual-care arms. The secondary outcome was difference in HbA1c from baseline at 6 months. KEY RESULTS: A total of 150 participants were enrolled in the study. A total of 102 participants (68%) completed the study. At 3 months, glucose self-monitoring rates in the hybrid versus usual-care arms were 0.72 vs 0.65, p = 0.23. At 6 months, change in HbA1c in the hybrid versus usual-care arms was - 0.74% vs - 0.49%, p = 0.69. CONCLUSION: There were no statistically significant differences between the hybrid and usual care in glucose self-monitoring adherence or improvements in HbA1C.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 137
页数:7
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] The Effectiveness of Prompts to Promote Engagement With Digital Interventions: A Systematic Review
    Alkhaldi, Ghadah
    Hamilton, Fiona L.
    Lau, Rosa
    Webster, Rosie
    Michie, Susan
    Murray, Elizabeth
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2016, 18 (01)
  • [2] 7. Diabetes Technology: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2021
    不详
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2021, 44 : S85 - S99
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2021, Community Health Workers
  • [4] Asch David A, 2012, LDI Issue Brief, V17, P1
  • [5] Association Diabetes Association 5, 2019, LIFESTYLE MANAGEMENT, V42, pS60, DOI [10.2337/dc19-S005, DOI 10.2337/DC19-S005]
  • [6] Bedell Precious, 2015, Health Justice, V3, P19
  • [7] Non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in minorities in the United States
    Carter, JS
    Pugh, JA
    Monterrosa, A
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1996, 125 (03) : 221 - 232
  • [8] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2020, NAT DIAB STAT REP
  • [9] CMS, RACIAL ETHNIC DISPAR
  • [10] A GLOBAL MEASURE OF PERCEIVED STRESS
    COHEN, S
    KAMARCK, T
    MERMELSTEIN, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL BEHAVIOR, 1983, 24 (04) : 385 - 396