Assessment of Chemical Products and Processes: Green Metrics and Life Cycle Assessment - A Comparison

被引:3
作者
Bloemer, Jan [1 ]
Maga, Daniel [1 ]
Roettgen, Janek [1 ]
Wu, Zhengxuan [1 ]
Hiebel, Markus [1 ]
Eilebrecht, Sebastian [2 ]
Jentsch, Sebastian [3 ]
Eggers, Natascha [3 ]
机构
[1] Fraunhofer Inst Environm Safety & Energy Technol U, Grp Sustainabil Assessment, Osterfelder Str 3, D-46047 Oberhausen, Germany
[2] Fraunhofer Inst Mol Biol & Appl Ecol IME, Dept Ecotoxicogen, Aberg 1, D-57392 Schmallenberg, Germany
[3] Fraunhofer Inst Factory Operat & Automat, Dept Energy Syst & Infrastruct, Joseph von Fraunhofer Str 1, D-39106 Magdeburg, Germany
关键词
Green chemistry; Green metrics; Greenness; Life cycle assessment; Sustainability; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; SUSTAINABILITY METRICS; PHARMACEUTICAL-INDUSTRY; EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES; CHEMISTRY; DESIGN; HEALTH; SAFETY; GOALS; WORK;
D O I
10.1002/cite.202300229
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Green chemistry aims to use renewable materials, reduce waste, and avoid toxic substances and is defined by 12 principles of green chemistry. Green metrics (GM) are measurable figures that assess adherence to the 12 principles of green chemistry. GM are designed to be user-friendly and can be applied without detailed process knowledge. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is another approach used to estimate the environmental impacts of products or processes throughout their life cycle. This paper compares LCA and GM, exploring their suitability for assessing the greenness of chemical products and processes. This includes the discussion of strengths and weaknesses, limitations, application areas, benefits of combining both approaches, and how to handle conflicting results. Green metrics and life cycle assessment are two tools to assess the impact of chemical processes and products on the environment. Both methods describe the eco-friendliness. Nevertheless, the results cannot be converted easily into each other, and they may even be contradictory. The reasons are briefly summarized and some recommendations for the use of both methods are given. image
引用
收藏
页码:561 / 574
页数:14
相关论文
共 82 条
  • [11] Green and sustainable chemistry - The case for a systems-based, interdisciplinary approach
    Constable, David J. C.
    [J]. ISCIENCE, 2021, 24 (12)
  • [12] Green chemistry measures for process research and development
    Constable, DJC
    Curzons, AD
    dos Santos, LMF
    Geen, GR
    Hannah, RE
    Hayler, JD
    Kitteringham, J
    McGuire, MA
    Richardson, JE
    Smith, P
    Webb, RL
    Yu, M
    [J]. GREEN CHEMISTRY, 2001, 3 (01) : 7 - 9
  • [13] Towards sustainable development through the circular economy-A review and critical assessment on current circularity metrics
    Corona, Blanca
    Shen, Li
    Reike, Denise
    Carreon, Jesus Rosales
    Worrell, Ernst
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2019, 151
  • [14] Fast life cycle assessment of synthetic chemistry (FLASC™) tool
    Curzons, Alan D.
    Jimenez-Gonzalez, Concepcion
    Duncan, Ailsa L.
    Constable, David J. C.
    Cunningham, Virginia L.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2007, 12 (04) : 272 - 280
  • [15] Software tools for green and sustainable chemistry
    Derbenev, Ivan N.
    Dowden, James
    Twycross, Jamie
    Hirst, Jonathan D.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN GREEN AND SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY, 2022, 35
  • [16] Dicks A.P., 2015, Green Chemistry Metrics: A Guide to Determining and Evaluating Process Greenness, P45, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-10500-0_3
  • [17] DIN, 2021, UMWELTMANAGEMENT OKO
  • [18] ECJRC, 2010, International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook: General Guide for Life Cycle Assessment: Detailed Guidance, VFirst, DOI 10.2788/38479
  • [19] Ekvall T., 2020, Modeling recycling in life cycle assessment
  • [20] European Commission, 2021, Commission recommendation C(2021)9332 final