Assessment of Chemical Products and Processes: Green Metrics and Life Cycle Assessment - A Comparison

被引:3
作者
Bloemer, Jan [1 ]
Maga, Daniel [1 ]
Roettgen, Janek [1 ]
Wu, Zhengxuan [1 ]
Hiebel, Markus [1 ]
Eilebrecht, Sebastian [2 ]
Jentsch, Sebastian [3 ]
Eggers, Natascha [3 ]
机构
[1] Fraunhofer Inst Environm Safety & Energy Technol U, Grp Sustainabil Assessment, Osterfelder Str 3, D-46047 Oberhausen, Germany
[2] Fraunhofer Inst Mol Biol & Appl Ecol IME, Dept Ecotoxicogen, Aberg 1, D-57392 Schmallenberg, Germany
[3] Fraunhofer Inst Factory Operat & Automat, Dept Energy Syst & Infrastruct, Joseph von Fraunhofer Str 1, D-39106 Magdeburg, Germany
关键词
Green chemistry; Green metrics; Greenness; Life cycle assessment; Sustainability; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; SUSTAINABILITY METRICS; PHARMACEUTICAL-INDUSTRY; EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES; CHEMISTRY; DESIGN; HEALTH; SAFETY; GOALS; WORK;
D O I
10.1002/cite.202300229
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Green chemistry aims to use renewable materials, reduce waste, and avoid toxic substances and is defined by 12 principles of green chemistry. Green metrics (GM) are measurable figures that assess adherence to the 12 principles of green chemistry. GM are designed to be user-friendly and can be applied without detailed process knowledge. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is another approach used to estimate the environmental impacts of products or processes throughout their life cycle. This paper compares LCA and GM, exploring their suitability for assessing the greenness of chemical products and processes. This includes the discussion of strengths and weaknesses, limitations, application areas, benefits of combining both approaches, and how to handle conflicting results. Green metrics and life cycle assessment are two tools to assess the impact of chemical processes and products on the environment. Both methods describe the eco-friendliness. Nevertheless, the results cannot be converted easily into each other, and they may even be contradictory. The reasons are briefly summarized and some recommendations for the use of both methods are given. image
引用
收藏
页码:561 / 574
页数:14
相关论文
共 82 条
  • [1] The Power of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals in Sustainable Chemistry and Engineering Research
    Anastas, Paul
    Nolasco, Marcelo
    Kerton, Francesca
    Kirchhoff, Mary
    Licence, Peter
    Pradeep, Thalappil
    Subramaniam, Bala
    Moores, Audrey
    [J]. ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2021, 9 (24) : 8015 - 8017
  • [2] The United Nations sustainability goals: How can sustainable chemistry contribute?
    Anastas, Paul T.
    Zimmerman, Julie B.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN GREEN AND SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY, 2018, 13 : 150 - 153
  • [3] Anastas PT, 1998, GREEN CHEMISTRY, P1
  • [4] Life cycle assessment and green chemistry: the yin and yang of industrial ecology
    Anastas, PT
    Lankey, RL
    [J]. GREEN CHEMISTRY, 2000, 2 (06) : 289 - 295
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2015, TRANSFORMING OUR WOR, DOI DOI 10.1007/S13398-014-0173-7.2
  • [6] Environmental Assessment of Emerging Technologies: Recommendations for Prospective LCA
    Arvidsson, Rickard
    Tillman, Anne-Marie
    Sanden, Bjorn A.
    Janssen, Matty
    Nordelof, Anders
    Kushnir, Duncan
    Molander, Sverker
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2018, 22 (06) : 1286 - 1294
  • [7] Combining life cycle assessment and qualitative risk assessment: The case study of alumina nanofluid production
    Barberio, Grazia
    Scalbi, Simona
    Buttol, Patrizia
    Masoni, Paolo
    Righi, Serena
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 496 : 122 - 131
  • [8] Camana Daniela, 2022, E3S Web of Conferences, V349, DOI 10.1051/e3sconf/202234913005
  • [9] Cespi D, 2016, GREEN CHEM, V18, P1625, DOI [10.1039/c5gc02148k, 10.1039/C5GC02148K]
  • [10] The renewable chemicals industry
    Christensen, Claus Hviid
    Rass-Hansen, Jeppe
    Marsden, Charlotte C.
    Taarning, Esben
    Egeblad, Kresten
    [J]. CHEMSUSCHEM, 2008, 1 (04) : 283 - 289