How mutual funds respond to asymmetric feedback trading in China's stock market

被引:4
作者
Wan, Die [1 ]
Yang, Li [2 ]
Yang, Xiaoguang [3 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Gongshang Univ, Sch Finance, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Univ New South Wales, Business Sch, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Acad Math & Syst Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Asymmetric feedback trading; Mutual fund shareholdings; Uncertainty; Market sentiment; Short selling; INDIVIDUAL INVESTORS; INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS; CROSS-SECTION; RISK; SENTIMENT; MODEL; UNCERTAINTY; PERFORMANCE; RETURNS; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmse.2024.01.001
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Previous studies show that individual investors play a dominant role in China's stock market. Their behavior of chasing-rise being stronger than killing-fall leads to asymmetry of feedback trading. Our article investigates how mutual funds react to this market force. Using China's stock and fund data from 2003 to 2019, we find that mutual funds tend to hold fewer shares when asymmetric feedback trading of the relevant stock gets more intense. This negative relationship is robust after controlling past returns, turnover rates, and firm risk factors, moreover, it attenuates when the market sentiment is bullish or when stocks are allowed short-selling. Further results show that mutual funds' selling towards asymmetric feedback trading does not make excess return but leads to significant risk reduction. Our findings may be related to uncertainty associated with asymmetric feedback trading, and thus support the limit market participation theory from the second largest stock market. (c) 2024 China Science Publishing & Media Ltd. Publishing Services by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co. Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 160
页数:18
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]   Bubbles and crashes [J].
Abreu, D ;
Brunnermeier, MK .
ECONOMETRICA, 2003, 71 (01) :173-204
[2]   Stock price synchronicity, crash risk, and institutional investors [J].
An, Heng ;
Zhang, Ting .
JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2013, 21 :1-15
[3]   Ambiguity aversion and stock market participation: An empirical analysis [J].
Antoniou, Constantinos ;
Harris, Richard D. F. ;
Zhang, Ruogu .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2015, 58 :57-70
[4]   Investor sentiment and the cross-section of stock returns [J].
Baker, Malcolm ;
Wurgler, Jeffrey .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2006, 61 (04) :1645-1680
[5]   Idiosyncratic volatility and the cross section of expected returns [J].
Bali, Turan G. ;
Cakici, Nusret .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS, 2008, 43 (01) :29-58
[6]  
Barber B.M., 2013, Handbook of the Economics of Finance, V2, P1533, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-44-459406-8.00022-6, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-44-459406-8.00022-6]
[7]   Trading is hazardous to your wealth: The common stock investment performance of individual investors [J].
Barber, BM ;
Odean, T .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2000, 55 (02) :773-806
[8]   Systematic noise [J].
Barber, Brad M. ;
Odean, Terrance ;
Zhu, Ning .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL MARKETS, 2009, 12 (04) :547-569
[9]   Just How Much Do Individual Investors Lose by Trading? [J].
Barber, Brad M. ;
Lee, Yi-Tsung ;
Liu, Yu-Jane ;
Odean, Terrance .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2009, 22 (02) :609-632
[10]   Do Retail Trades Move Markets? [J].
Barber, Brad M. ;
Odean, Terrance ;
Zhu, Ning .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2009, 22 (01) :151-186