Evaluating the environmental performance of 45 real-life wooden buildings: A comprehensive analysis of low-impact construction practices

被引:19
作者
Andersen, Camilla Ernst [1 ,3 ]
Hoxha, Endrit [1 ]
Rasmussen, Freja Nygaard [2 ]
Sorensen, Christian Grau [1 ]
Birgisdottir, Harpa [1 ]
机构
[1] Aalborg Univ, Dept Built Environm, Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Trondheim, Norway
[3] AC Meyers Vaenge 15, DK-2450 Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Timber buildings; Environmental impact; Sustainability; Construction industry; Renewable materials; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; CYCLE ASSESSMENT; RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS; STRUCTURAL SYSTEM; TIMBER BUILDINGS; CARBON FOOTPRINT; EMBODIED CARBON; ENERGY ANALYSIS; ZERO-ENERGY; HOUSE;
D O I
10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111201
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Buildings are responsible for 37 % of global Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions. Subsequently, stakeholders in this sector have introduced different strategies to reduce the environmental impact of buildings. One strategy focuses on increasing the use of wood in buildings as a low-impact material with the potential to act as a carbon sink. Although research shows a tendency towards lower GHG emissions from wood structures compared to conventional constructions, the existing literature is typically challenged by methodological inconsistencies and only assesses a limited number of building projects at a time. As a result, uncertainties are introduced about comparisons between them, how their background and modeling assumptions may vary, as well as the integrity of the assessed solutions. Hence, this study analyses 45 cases of buildings applying the same methodology to enable a comprehensive understanding of the environmental performance of wooden buildings, identifying common trends, challenges, and best practices. This study finds that the embodied impacts contribute highly to the environmental impact and thus remain essential to consider. However, there is a very weak correlation between the quantities of wood used in the buildings and the environmental impact for wooden buildings, but a strong correlation between the quantities of insulation, plastics, composites, and POCP, ODP, ODP and EP, respectively. Therefore, the use of these materials should be optimized to further reduce the environmental impact of wood buildings.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 134 条
[1]  
Aagaard N.-J., 2013, Danish: Levetider Af Bygningsdele Ved Vurdering Af Baeredygtighed Og Totalokonomi), V30
[2]  
Ajayi e.a., 2015, INT J SUSTAINABLE BU, V6, P14
[3]   Comparative Cradle-to-Grave Life Cycle Assessment of Low and Mid-Rise Mass Timber Buildings with Equivalent Structural Steel Alternatives [J].
Allan, Kevin ;
Phillips, Adam R. .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (06)
[4]   Embodied emissions of buildings-A forgotten factor in green building certificates [J].
Amiri, Ali ;
Emami, Nargessadat ;
Ottelin, Juudit ;
Sorvari, Jaana ;
Marteinsson, Bjorn ;
Heinonen, Jukka ;
Junnila, Seppo .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2021, 241
[5]   Embodied GHG Emissions of Wooden Buildings-Challenges of Biogenic Carbon Accounting in Current LCA Methods [J].
Andersen, C. E. ;
Rasmussen, F. N. ;
Habert, G. ;
Birgisdottir, H. .
FRONTIERS IN BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 7
[6]   Comparative life cycle assessment of cross laminated timber building and concrete building with special focus on biogenic carbon [J].
Andersen, Julie Hansted ;
Rasmussen, Nana Lin ;
Ryberg, Morten Walbech .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2022, 254
[7]   Embodied carbon of concrete in buildings, Part 1: analysis of published EPD [J].
Anderson, Jane ;
Moncaster, Alice .
BUILDINGS & CITIES, 2020, 1 (01) :198-217
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2022, SRB Addendum to the Public Interest Assessment-Deposit Guarantee Schemes Considerations
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2014, EN 16485
[10]   Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and energy analysis of prefabricated reusable building modules [J].
Aye, Lu ;
Ngo, T. ;
Crawford, R. H. ;
Gammampila, R. ;
Mendis, P. .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2012, 47 :159-168