Review of Machine Learning Methods for River Flood Routing

被引:2
作者
Li, Li [1 ]
Jun, Kyung Soo [2 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Global Engn Inst Ultimate Soc GENIUS, Suwon 16419, South Korea
[2] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Grad Sch Water Resources, Suwon 16419, South Korea
关键词
machine learning; river flood routing; hydrologic model; hydrodynamic model; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORK; 4-PARAMETER NONLINEAR MUSKINGUM; PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION; PARAMETER-ESTIMATION; MODEL; SIMULATION; SYSTEM; ANN;
D O I
10.3390/w16020364
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
River flood routing computes changes in the shape of a flood wave over time as it travels downstream along a river. Conventional flood routing models, especially hydrodynamic models, require a high quality and quantity of input data, such as measured hydrologic time series, geometric data, hydraulic structures, and hydrological parameters. Unlike physically based models, machine learning algorithms, which are data-driven models, do not require much knowledge about underlying physical processes and can identify complex nonlinearity between inputs and outputs. Due to their higher performance, lower complexity, and low computation cost, researchers introduced novel machine learning methods as a single application or hybrid application to achieve more accurate and efficient flood routing. This paper reviews the recent application of machine learning methods in river flood routing.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 87 条
  • [1] Parameter estimation of Muskingum model using grey wolf optimizer algorithm
    Akbari, Reyhaneh
    Hessami-Kermani, Masoud-Reza
    [J]. METHODSX, 2021, 8
  • [2] Flood Routing: Improving Outflow Using a New Non-linear Muskingum Model with Four Variable Parameters Coupled with PSO-GA Algorithm
    Akbari, Reyhaneh
    Hessami-Kermani, Masoud-Reza
    Shojaee, Saeed
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2020, 34 (10) : 3291 - 3316
  • [3] Imperialist competitive algorithm: An algorithm for optimization inspired by imperialistic competition
    Atashpaz-Gargari, Esmaeil
    Lucas, Caro
    [J]. 2007 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, VOLS 1-10, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, : 4661 - 4667
  • [4] Parameter Estimation of Nonlinear Muskingum Models Using Nelder-Mead Simplex Algorithm
    Barati, Reza
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2011, 16 (11) : 946 - 954
  • [5] DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING
    BELLMAN, R
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1966, 153 (3731) : 34 - &
  • [6] BERTSEKAS D. P., 1995, J Oper Res Soc, DOI 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600425
  • [7] Bozorg-Haddad O, 2015, J IRRIG DRAIN ENG, V141, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000929
  • [8] Random forests
    Breiman, L
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) : 5 - 32
  • [9] Improving flood simulation capability of the WRF-Hydro-RAPID model using a multi-source precipitation merging method
    Chao, Lijun
    Zhang, Ke
    Yang, Zong-Liang
    Wang, Jingfeng
    Lin, Peirong
    Liang, Jingjing
    Li, Zhijia
    Gu, Zhao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2021, 592
  • [10] Comparison of hydrodynamic models of different complexities to model floods with emergency storage areas
    Chatterjee, Chandranath
    Foerster, Saskia
    Bronstert, Axel
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2008, 22 (24) : 4695 - 4709