Human rights in Australia's early international relations: unity, prosperity, and the abolition of slavery

被引:0
作者
Jeffery, Renee [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Griffith Asia Inst, Nathan, Qld, Australia
[2] Griffith Univ, Griffith Asia Inst, 170 Kessels Rd, Nathan, Qld 4111, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Australian foreign policy; human rights; slavery; indentured labour; South Sea Islanders; QUEENSLAND SUGAR; HISTORY;
D O I
10.1080/10357718.2024.2308032
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
For the most part, histories of Australia's international relations locate the origins of its engagement with the international human rights regime in the 1940s. By then, however, debates about human rights had been appearing in the Australian newspapers for more than a century, focused, among other things, on the application of universal rights to the foreign peoples with which the colonies were engaged in their international affairs. Drawing on archival materials and newspaper articles from 1803 to 1901, this article examines the place of human rights in the international relations of nineteenth century colonial Australia. Focusing on debates over the use of Indian and South Sea Islander indentured labour, it demonstrates how ideas developed in the context of the anti-slavery movement of the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries shaped debates about the universal applicability of human rights in the Australian colonies' engagements with others. In doing so, it provides an account of the early development of human rights ideas in the Australian colonies and demonstrates how they sought to resist human rights claims in their international affairs, choosing instead to prioritise the pursuit of national (racial) unity and prosperity over the rights of others.
引用
收藏
页码:58 / 78
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   China's human rights concept and its international promotion [J].
Tsvyk, A., V ;
Tsvyk, G., I .
RUDN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY-VESTNIK ROSSIISKOGO UNIVERSITETA DRUZHBY NARODOV SERIYA SOTSIOLOGIYA, 2019, 19 (01) :20-30
[22]   The Impact of International Perception on China’s Approach to Human Rights [J].
Primiano C.B. .
East Asia, 2015, 32 (4) :401-419
[23]   IS THE PRINCIPAL FUNCTION OF INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW TO ADDRESS THE PATHOLOGIES OF INTERNATIONAL LAW? A COMMENT ON PATRICK MACKLEM'S THE SOVEREIGNTY OF HUMAN RIGHTS [J].
McCrudden, Christopher .
UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO LAW JOURNAL, 2017, 67 (04) :623-636
[24]   Questioning Segregation of People Living with Dementia in Australia: An International Human Rights Approach to Care Homes [J].
Steele, Linda ;
Swaffer, Kate ;
Phillipson, Lyn ;
Fleming, Richard .
LAWS, 2019, 8 (03)
[25]   The Promotion of LGBT Rights as International Human Rights Norms: Explaining Brazil's Diplomatic Leadership [J].
Bonna Nogueira, Maria Beatriz .
GLOBAL GOVERNANCE, 2017, 23 (04) :545-563
[26]   International Human Rights Recommendations at Home: Introducing the Women's Rights Compliance Database (WRCD) [J].
Haglund, Jillienne ;
Hillebrecht, Courtney ;
Read, Hannah Roesch .
INTERNATIONAL INTERACTIONS, 2022, 48 (05) :1070-1087
[27]   Secrecy and human rights abuse in Australia's offshore immigration detention centres [J].
Nethery, Amy ;
Holman, Rosa .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN RIGHTS, 2016, 20 (07) :1018-1038
[28]   China's Response to International Normative Pressure: The Case of Human Rights [J].
Inboden, Rana ;
Chen, Titus .
INTERNATIONAL SPECTATOR, 2012, 47 (02) :45-57
[29]   Is today's international human rights system a global governance regime? [J].
Nickel J.W. .
The Journal of Ethics, 2002, 6 (4) :353-371
[30]   Privatization of essential services, State's international services and human rights [J].
Bautista Justo, Juan .
DERECHO Y CIENCIAS SOCIALES, 2024, :169-190