Solution of the EEG inverse problem by random dipole sampling

被引:1
|
作者
Della Cioppa, L. [1 ,2 ]
Tartaglione, M. [1 ]
Pascarella, A. [3 ]
Pitolli, F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Rome, Italy
[2] Ist Sci Marine, CNR, Rome, Italy
[3] Ist Applicazioni Calcolo Mauro Picone, CNR, Rome, Italy
关键词
EEG imaging; underdetermined inverse problem; random sampling; inversion method; wMNE; sLORETA; MONTE-CARLO ALGORITHMS; SOURCE LOCALIZATION; BRAIN; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6420/ad14a1
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
Electroencephalography (EEG) source imaging aims to reconstruct brain activity maps from the neuroelectric potential difference measured on the skull. To obtain the brain activity map, we need to solve an ill-posed and ill-conditioned inverse problem that requires regularization techniques to make the solution viable. When dealing with real-time applications, dimensionality reduction techniques can be used to reduce the computational load required to evaluate the numerical solution of the EEG inverse problem. To this end, in this paper we use the random dipole sampling method, in which a Monte Carlo technique is used to reduce the number of neural sources. This is equivalent to reducing the number of the unknowns in the inverse problem and can be seen as a first regularization step. Then, we solve the reduced EEG inverse problem with two popular inversion methods, the weighted Minimum Norm Estimate (wMNE) and the standardized LOw Resolution brain Electromagnetic TomogrAphy (sLORETA). The main result of this paper is the error estimates of the reconstructed activity map obtained with the randomized version of wMNE and sLORETA. Numerical experiments on synthetic EEG data demonstrate the effectiveness of the random dipole sampling method.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EFFECTS OF CAVITY ON EEG INVERSE DIPOLE SOLUTION
    HE, B
    MUSHA, T
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, PTS 1-4, 1988, : 968 - 969
  • [2] Numerical solution of EEG inverse problem
    Hoffmann, C.
    Popov, A.M.
    Pevtsov, S.E.
    Fedulova, I.A.
    Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Ser. 15 Vychislitel'naya Matematika i Kibernetika, 2004, (04): : 16 - 27
  • [3] An Approximated Solution to the Inverse Problem of EEG
    Ibanez-Catala, X.
    Troparevsky, M. I.
    4TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION FOR MEDICAL AND BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2009, 22 (1-3): : 1255 - 1258
  • [4] INVERSE PROBLEM OF EEG-COMPUTING A VIRTUAL DIPOLE SOURCE FROM EEG
    SIDMAN, RD
    SMITH, DB
    ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1974, 37 (02): : 212 - 213
  • [5] INVERSE PROBLEM OF ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY - COMPUTING A VIRTUAL DIPOLE SOURCE FROM EEG
    SIDMAN, RD
    SMITH, DB
    ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1973, 34 (07): : 734 - 734
  • [6] Solution of inverse problem for a charge combined with a point-like dipole
    Epp, VY
    Mitrofanova, TG
    1998 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN ELECTROMAGNETIC THEORY, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1998, : 167 - 168
  • [7] Solution of inverse problem for a charge combined with a point-like dipole
    Epp, V.Ya.
    Mitrofanova, T.G.
    Mathematical Methods in Electromagnetic Theory, MMET, Conference Proceedings, 1998, 1 : 167 - 168
  • [8] An inverse dipole source problem in inhomogeneous media: Application to the EEG source localization in neonates
    Darbas, Marion
    Diallo, Mohamadou Malal
    El Badia, Abdellatif
    Lohrengel, Stephanie
    JOURNAL OF INVERSE AND ILL-POSED PROBLEMS, 2019, 27 (02): : 255 - 281
  • [9] Reduced Conductivity Dependence Method for Increase of Dipole Localization Accuracy in the EEG Inverse Problem
    Yitembe, Bertrand Russel
    Crevecoeur, Guillaume
    Van Keer, Roger
    Dupre, Luc
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 58 (05) : 1430 - 1440
  • [10] A random regularized approximate solution of the inverse problem for Burgers' equation
    Nane, Erkan
    Nguyen Hoang Tuan
    Nguyen Huy Tuan
    STATISTICS & PROBABILITY LETTERS, 2018, 132 : 46 - 54