Quantitative Analysis of Prostate MRI: Correlation between Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Parameters

被引:1
|
作者
Choi, Moon-Hyung [1 ]
Lee, Young-Joon [1 ]
Han, Dongyeob [2 ]
Kim, Dong-Hyun [3 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Korea, Eunpyeong St Marys Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, Seoul 03312, South Korea
[2] Siemens Healthineers Ltd, Seoul 06620, South Korea
[3] Yonsei Univ, Sch Elect & Elect Engn, Seoul 03722, South Korea
关键词
magnetic resonance fingerprinting; dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging; quantitative analysis; prostate; prostate neoplasm; MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI; CANCER; DIFFERENTIATION; HYPERPLASIA;
D O I
10.3390/curroncol30120750
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
This research aimed to assess the relationship between contrast-enhanced (CE) magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) values and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI parameters including (K-trans, K-ep, V-e, and iAUC). To evaluate the correlation between the MRF-derived values (T1 and T2 values, CE T1 and T2 values, T1 and T2 change) and DCE-MRI parameters and the differences in the parameters between prostate cancer and noncancer lesions in 68 patients, two radiologists independently drew regions-of-interest (ROIs) at the focal prostate lesions. Prostate cancer was identified in 75% (51/68) of patients. The CE T2 value was significantly lower in prostate cancer than in noncancer lesions in the peripheral zone and transition zone. K-trans, K-ep, and iAUC were significantly higher in prostate cancer than noncancer lesions in the peripheral zone (p < 0.05), but not in the transition zone. The CE T1 value was significantly correlated with K-trans, V-e, and iAUC in prostate cancer, and the CE T2 value was correlated to V-e in noncancer. Some CE MRF values are different between prostate cancer and noncancer tissues and correlate with DCE-MRI parameters. Prostate cancer and noncancer tissues may have different characteristics regarding contrast enhancement.
引用
收藏
页码:10299 / 10310
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A comparative study between the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced digital mammography and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast
    Fakhry, Sherihan
    Kamal, Rasha Mohamed
    Nada, Omnia Mokhtar
    Mohamed, Amira Emad Abo El Enien
    Hanafy, Mennatallah Mohamed
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2024, 55 (01)
  • [22] Interscanner Comparison of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Prostate Cancer 1.5 Versus 3 T MRI
    Sertdemir, Metin
    Schoenberg, Stefan O.
    Sourbron, Steven
    Hausmann, Daniel
    Heinzelbecker, Julia
    Michaely, Henrik J.
    Dinter, Dietmar J.
    Weidner, Anja M.
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2013, 48 (02) : 92 - 97
  • [23] Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the microenvironment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma xenografts
    Wegner, Catherine S.
    Hauge, Anette
    Gaustad, Jon-Vidar
    Andersen, Lise Mari K.
    Simonsen, Trude G.
    Galappathi, Kanthi
    Rofstad, Einar K.
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2017, 56 (12) : 1754 - 1762
  • [24] The comparison between contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing bladder urothelial carcinoma
    Fu, Wenyu
    Liu, Dan
    Xiong, Yongjiang
    Liu, Chuan
    Liu, Jiaji
    Yi, Xinping
    Zhao, Tao
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2023, 55 (05) : 1073 - 1079
  • [25] Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and pharmacokinetic models in prostate cancer
    Tobias Franiel
    Bernd Hamm
    Hedvig Hricak
    European Radiology, 2011, 21 : 616 - 626
  • [26] Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI of the Prostate: Comparison of Two Different Post-Processing Algorithms
    Beyersdorff, D.
    Luedemann, L.
    Dietz, E.
    Galler, D.
    Marchot, P.
    Franiel, T.
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2011, 183 (05): : 456 - 461
  • [27] Selection of Fitting Model and Arterial Input Function for Repeatability in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Prostate MRI
    Peled, Sharon
    Vangel, Mark
    Kikinis, Ron
    Tempany, Clare M.
    Fennessy, Fiona M.
    Fedorov, Andrey
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2019, 26 (09) : E241 - E251
  • [28] Comparison between Breast MRI and Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography
    Luczynska, Elzbieta
    Heinze-Paluchowska, Sylwia
    Hendrick, Edward
    Dyczek, Sonia
    Rys, Janusz
    Herman, Krzysztof
    Blecharz, Pawel
    Jakubowicz, Jerzy
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2015, 21 : 1358 - 1367
  • [29] Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and pharmacokinetic models in prostate cancer
    Franiel, Tobias
    Hamm, Bernd
    Hricak, Hedvig
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2011, 21 (03) : 616 - 626
  • [30] Optimized Fast Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate Effect of Sampling Duration on Pharmacokinetic Parameters
    Othman, Ahmed E.
    Falkner, Florian
    Martirosian, Petros
    Schraml, Christina
    Schwentner, Christian
    Nickel, Dominik
    Nikolaou, Konstantin
    Notohamiprodjo, Mike
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2016, 51 (02) : 106 - 112