Superior detection of significant prostate cancer by transperineal prostate biopsy using MRI-transrectal ultrasound fusion image guidance over cognitive registration

被引:3
|
作者
Ito, Masaya [1 ]
Yonese, Ichiro [1 ]
Toide, Masahiro [1 ]
Ikuta, Shuzo [2 ]
Kobayashi, Shuichiro [1 ]
Koga, Fumitaka [1 ]
机构
[1] Komagome Hosp, Tokyo Metropolitan Canc & Infect Dis Ctr, Dept Urol, 3-18-22 Honkomagome,Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo 1138677, Japan
[2] Komagome Hosp, Tokyo Metropolitan Canc & Infect Dis Ctr, Dept Radiol, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
Prostate cancer; MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy; BioJet; Targeted biopsy; Systematic biopsy; LOCAL-ANESTHESIA;
D O I
10.1007/s10147-023-02404-z
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe BioJet system allows the fusion of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images with real-time transrectal ultrasonography to accurately direct biopsy needles to the target lesions. To date, the superiority of targeted biopsy using the BioJet system over cognitive registration remains unknown.MethodsThis retrospective study included 171 biopsy-naive men with elevated prostate-specific antigen (2.5-20 ng/mL) and MRI-positive lesions; 74 and 97 men underwent a four-core targeted biopsy per MRI-positive target lesion and a 14-core systematic biopsy transperineally using the BioJet system and cognitive registration, respectively. Detection rates of significant cancer, defined as grade group & GE; 2 or maximum cancer length & GE; 5 mm, were compared between the BioJet system and cognitive registration using propensity score matching and a multivariate logistic regression model.ResultsAfter propensity score matching (67 men for each group), the detection rates of significant cancer were significantly higher in the BioJet group than in the cognitive group for both targeted (76% vs. 46%, P = 0.002) and systematic (70% vs. 46%, P = 0.018) biopsy. Multivariate analysis of the entire cohort also showed that the BioJet system was independently associated with significant cancer detection by targeted and systematic biopsy (P < 0.01), along with a higher prostate-specific antigen density and a higher prostate imaging reporting and data system score.ConclusionsTransperineal prostate biopsy using the BioJet system is superior to cognitive registration in detecting significant cancer for targeted and systematic biopsies.
引用
收藏
页码:1545 / 1553
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Meta-Analysis of Transperineal and Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy in the Detection of Prostate Cancer
    Fang, Yanchun
    Xia, Linv
    Lu, Haiyan
    He, Hailing
    ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2024, 77 (09): : 1089 - 1099
  • [22] Detection of Significant Prostate Cancer Using Target Saturation in Transperineal Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasonography-fusion Biopsy
    Tschirdewahn, Stephan
    Wiesenfarth, Manuel
    Bonekamp, David
    Puellen, Lukas
    Reis, Henning
    Panic, Andrej
    Kesch, Claudia
    Darr, Christopher
    Hess, Jochen
    Giganti, Francesco
    Moore, Caroline M.
    Guberina, Nika
    Forsting, Michael
    Wetter, Axel
    Hadaschik, Boris
    Radtke, Jan Philipp
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2021, 7 (06): : 1300 - 1307
  • [23] MRI-transrectal ultrasound cognitive fusion-targeted transperineal template-guided saturation prostate biopsies in a consecutive cohort of men.
    Matzkin, Haim
    Dekalo, Snir
    Mabjeesh, Nicola J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (02)
  • [24] Improving Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy
    Rastinehad, Ardeshir R.
    Turkbey, Baris
    Salami, Simpa S.
    Yaskiv, Oksana
    George, Arvin K.
    Fakhoury, Mathew
    Beecher, Karin
    Vira, Manish A.
    Kavoussi, Louis R.
    Siegel, David N.
    Villani, Robert
    Ben-Levi, Eran
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (06): : 1749 - 1754
  • [25] PROSTATE CANCER DETECTION AND COMPLICATIONS OF TRANSPERINEAL VERSUS TRANSRECTAL MRI-FUSION GUIDED PROSTATE BIOPSIES
    Buller, Dylan
    Sahl, Jessa
    Staff, Ilene
    Tortora, Joseph
    Pinto, Kevin
    McLaughlin, Tara
    Valintin, Laura Olivo
    Wagner, Joseph
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (05): : E137 - E137
  • [26] Prostate MRI and transperineal TRUS/MRI fusion biopsy for prostate cancer detection: clinical practice updates
    Martorana, Eugenio
    Pirola, Giacomo Maria
    Aisa, Maria Cristina
    Scialpi, Pietro
    Di Blasi, Aldo
    Saredi, Giovanni
    D'Andrea, Alfredo
    Signore, Stefano
    Grisanti, Riccardo
    Scialpi, Michele
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 45 (04): : 237 - 244
  • [27] Comparison of transperineal and transrectal biopsy approaches to detect clinically significant prostate cancer in patients undergoing MRI fusion prostate biopsy: A lesion level analysis.
    Wood, Andrew
    Khooblall, Prajit
    Benidir, Tarik
    Bullen, Jennifer
    Ward, Ryan
    Purysko, Andrei
    Weight, Christopher J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 41
  • [28] Re: Transperineal Magnetic Resonance Image Targeted Prostate Biopsy Versus Transperineal Template Prostate Biopsy in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
    Ravery, Vincent
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2013, 64 (02) : 337 - 337
  • [29] Editorial Comment: Which Targeted Prostate Biopsy Technique Is Better-In-Bore or MRI-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion?
    Costa, Daniel N.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2021, 217 (05) : 1131 - 1131
  • [30] Multiparametric ultrasound-targeted biopsy compares favorably to multiparametric MRI-transrectal ultrasound fusion-targeted biopsy on initial biopsy of men at risk for prostate cancer
    Pat F. Fulgham
    World Journal of Urology, 2018, 36 : 713 - 718