Superior detection of significant prostate cancer by transperineal prostate biopsy using MRI-transrectal ultrasound fusion image guidance over cognitive registration

被引:3
|
作者
Ito, Masaya [1 ]
Yonese, Ichiro [1 ]
Toide, Masahiro [1 ]
Ikuta, Shuzo [2 ]
Kobayashi, Shuichiro [1 ]
Koga, Fumitaka [1 ]
机构
[1] Komagome Hosp, Tokyo Metropolitan Canc & Infect Dis Ctr, Dept Urol, 3-18-22 Honkomagome,Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo 1138677, Japan
[2] Komagome Hosp, Tokyo Metropolitan Canc & Infect Dis Ctr, Dept Radiol, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
Prostate cancer; MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy; BioJet; Targeted biopsy; Systematic biopsy; LOCAL-ANESTHESIA;
D O I
10.1007/s10147-023-02404-z
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe BioJet system allows the fusion of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images with real-time transrectal ultrasonography to accurately direct biopsy needles to the target lesions. To date, the superiority of targeted biopsy using the BioJet system over cognitive registration remains unknown.MethodsThis retrospective study included 171 biopsy-naive men with elevated prostate-specific antigen (2.5-20 ng/mL) and MRI-positive lesions; 74 and 97 men underwent a four-core targeted biopsy per MRI-positive target lesion and a 14-core systematic biopsy transperineally using the BioJet system and cognitive registration, respectively. Detection rates of significant cancer, defined as grade group & GE; 2 or maximum cancer length & GE; 5 mm, were compared between the BioJet system and cognitive registration using propensity score matching and a multivariate logistic regression model.ResultsAfter propensity score matching (67 men for each group), the detection rates of significant cancer were significantly higher in the BioJet group than in the cognitive group for both targeted (76% vs. 46%, P = 0.002) and systematic (70% vs. 46%, P = 0.018) biopsy. Multivariate analysis of the entire cohort also showed that the BioJet system was independently associated with significant cancer detection by targeted and systematic biopsy (P < 0.01), along with a higher prostate-specific antigen density and a higher prostate imaging reporting and data system score.ConclusionsTransperineal prostate biopsy using the BioJet system is superior to cognitive registration in detecting significant cancer for targeted and systematic biopsies.
引用
收藏
页码:1545 / 1553
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Superior detection of significant prostate cancer by transperineal prostate biopsy using MRI-transrectal ultrasound fusion image guidance over cognitive registration
    Masaya Ito
    Ichiro Yonese
    Masahiro Toide
    Shuzo Ikuta
    Shuichiro Kobayashi
    Fumitaka Koga
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2023, 28 : 1545 - 1553
  • [2] A New Technique in Fresh Prostate Cancer Tissue Biobanking Based on MRI-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy
    Ji, Changwei
    Wang, Wei
    Lu, Qun
    Fu, Yao
    Jiang, Hao
    Chen, Wei
    Guo, Hongqian
    UROLOGY, 2019, 134 : 186 - 191
  • [3] A Comparison of Prostate Cancer Detection between Visual Estimation (Cognitive Registration) and Image Fusion (Software Registration) Targeted Transperineal Prostate Biopsy
    Khoo, Christopher C.
    Eldred-Evans, David
    Peters, Max
    van Son, Marieke
    van Rossum, Peter S. N.
    Connor, Martin J.
    Hosking-Jervis, Feargus
    Tanaka, Mariana Bertoncelli
    Reddy, Deepika
    Bass, Edward
    Powell, Laura
    Ahmad, Shahzad
    Pegers, Elizabeth
    Joshi, Suchita
    Sri, Denosshan
    Wong, Kathie
    Tam, Henry
    Hrouda, David
    Qazi, Hasan
    Gordon, Stephen
    McCracken, Stuart
    Winkler, Mathias
    Ahmed, Hashim U.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 205 (04): : 1075 - 1081
  • [4] Evaluation of MRI/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Prostate Biopsy Using Transrectal and Transperineal Approaches
    Tewes, Susanne
    Peters, Inga
    Tiemeyer, Ansgar
    Peperhove, Matti
    Hartung, Dagmar
    Pertschy, Stefanie
    Kuczyk, Markus A.
    Wacker, Frank
    Hueper, Katja
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 2017
  • [5] LEARNING CURVE FOR TRANSPERINEAL ULTRASOUND/MRI FUSION BIOPSY FOR THE DETECTION OF PROSTATE CANCER
    Elkun, Yuval
    Dumke, Henry
    Wong, Vincent
    Bassily, Daniel
    Wong, Nathan
    Dixon, Christopher
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (05): : E691 - E692
  • [6] A Prospective Comparison of Transrectal Standard, Cognitive, Transperineal Fusion, and Mapping Prostate Biopsy for Cancer Detection
    Petov, Vladislav
    Bazarkin, Andrey
    Morozov, Andrey
    Taratkin, Mark
    Ganzha, Timur
    Danilov, Sergey
    Chernov, Yaroslav
    Chinenov, Denis
    Rzayev, Ramin
    Suvorov, Alexander
    Amosov, Alexander
    Fajkovic, Harun
    Enikeev, Dmitry
    Krupinov, German
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2023, 37 (08) : 940 - 947
  • [7] DETECTION OF SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER USING TARGET SATURATION IN TRANSPERINEAL MRI/TRUS-FUSION BIOPSY
    Tschirdewahn, Stephan
    Wiesenfarth, Manuel
    Bonekamp, David
    Puellen, Lukas
    Reis, Henning
    Panic, Andrej
    Kesch, Claudia
    Darr, Christopher
    Giganti, Francesco
    Forsting, Michael
    Wetter, Axel
    Hadaschik, Boris
    Radtke, Jan Philipp
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E853 - E853
  • [8] Combination of fusion guided multiparametric MRI-transrectal US with systematic biopsy of the prostate for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: A prospective single-center study
    Agrotis, Georgios
    Tsougos, Ioannis
    Oikonomou, Athanasios
    Vassiou, Katerina
    Karatzas, Anastasios
    Tamposis, Ioannis
    Fanariotis, Michalis
    Vamvakas, Alexandros
    Tzortzis, Vasilis
    Vlychou, Marianna
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND, 2023, 51 (06) : 1101 - 1111
  • [9] MRI-DIRECTED BIOPSY FOR PRIMARY DETECTION OF PROSTATE CANCER: MRI IN-BORE VS MRI-TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND FUSION-TARGETED TECHNIQUES
    Del Giudice, Francesco
    Del Monte, Maurizio
    Cipollari, Stefano
    Pecoraro, Martina
    Bicchetti, Marco
    Messina, Emanuele
    Dehghanpour, Ailin
    Sciarra, Alessandro
    De Berardinis, Ettore
    Chung, Benjamin I.
    Catalano, Carlo
    Panebianco, Valeria
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (05): : E901 - E901
  • [10] Transperineal vs. transrectal MRI-targeted prostate biopsy: Evaluation of cancer detection risk and biopsy accuracy for clinical significant prostate cancer
    Zattoni, F.
    Marra, G.
    Kasivisvanathan, V.
    Kretschmer, A.
    Apfelbeck, M.
    Barletta, F.
    Cirulli, G.
    Marquis, A.
    Gontero, P.
    Guo, H.
    Zhuang, J.
    Morlacco, A.
    Soligo, M.
    Dal Moro, F.
    Gandaglia, G.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2021, 79 : S1348 - S1349