On the influence of soil flexibility in structural topology optimization

被引:0
作者
Cortez, R. [1 ]
Sivapuram, R. [2 ]
Barros, P. L. A. [3 ]
Labaki, J. [3 ]
Picelli, R. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Mech Engn, Polytech Sch, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Dassault Syst Simulia Corp, Johnston, RI USA
[3] Univ Estadual Campinas, Sch Mech Engn, Campinas, Brazil
[4] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Naval Architecture & Ocean Engn, Polytech Sch, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
binary design variables; Indirect Boundary Element Method; soil-structure interaction; TOBS method; topology optimization; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1002/nag.3594
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
This paper investigates for the first time the effect of soil flexibility in structural topology optimization. The case of a structure resting on an underlying soil is explored. The response of the soil is modeled using the Indirect Boundary Element Method (IBEM). The structure is modeled using Finite Element Method (FEM) and the soil domain is coupled by imposing continuity and equilibrium conditions at the soil-structure interface. Original soil stress influence functions are derived to model voids in the soil. The optimization is carried out by using the Topology Optimization of Binary Structures (TOBS), a recently developed method that employs sequential integer linear programming and the branch-and-cut algorithm. Structural compliance minimization subject to a volume constraint is solved. Selected optimization problems are solved for various soil-to-structure flexibility ratios. Results show that the soil flexibility may have a significant impact in both the optimized topology and in the achievable compliance of the structure. Results considering voids on the soil, which increases the soil flexibility, affected the final topology of the structures as well as the optimized values.
引用
收藏
页码:2618 / 2642
页数:25
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Structural optimization using sensitivity analysis and a level-set method [J].
Allaire, G ;
Jouve, F ;
Toader, AM .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2004, 194 (01) :363-393
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1956, J MATH PHYS, DOI DOI 10.1002/SAPM1956351318
[3]   GENERATING OPTIMAL TOPOLOGIES IN STRUCTURAL DESIGN USING A HOMOGENIZATION METHOD [J].
BENDSOE, MP ;
KIKUCHI, N .
COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 1988, 71 (02) :197-224
[4]   Influence of foundation flexibility on the topology optimization of piled structures [J].
Cavalcante, Iago ;
Tavares, Emanuel ;
Picelli, Renato ;
Labaki, Josue .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL AND ANALYTICAL METHODS IN GEOMECHANICS, 2022, 46 (04) :659-673
[5]  
Christensen R.M., 2010, Theory of viscoelasticity
[6]   A survey of structural and multidisciplinary continuum topology optimization: post 2000 [J].
Deaton, Joshua D. ;
Grandhi, Ramana V. .
STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2014, 49 (01) :1-38
[7]   Connecting Microstructures for Multiscale Topology Optimization With Connectivity Index Constraints [J].
Du, Zongliang ;
Zhou, Xiao-Yi ;
Picelli, Renato ;
Kim, H. Alicia .
JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2018, 140 (11)
[8]  
Haftka R.T., 1991, ELEMENTS STRUCTURAL
[9]   Convergent and mesh-independent solutions for the bi-directional evolutionary structural optimization method [J].
Huang, X. ;
Xie, Y. M. .
FINITE ELEMENTS IN ANALYSIS AND DESIGN, 2007, 43 (14) :1039-1049
[10]   Mass minimization with conflicting dynamic constraints by topology optimization using sequential integer programming [J].
Larsson, Johan ;
Wennhage, Per ;
Goransson, Peter .
FINITE ELEMENTS IN ANALYSIS AND DESIGN, 2022, 200