A pilot study of on-site evaluation as external quality assessment for ISO 15189 accreditation of laboratories performing next-generation sequencing oncology tests

被引:0
作者
Ravzanaadii, Mendamar [1 ]
Asai, Satomi [1 ]
Kakizoe, Hidefumi [1 ]
Natsagdorj, Munkh-Erdene [1 ,2 ]
Miyachi, Hayato [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Tokai Univ, Sch Med, Dept Lab Med, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan
[2] Mongolian Natl Univ Med Sci, Sch Med, Dept Hematol, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
[3] Nitobe Bunka Coll, Fac Clin Lab Sci, Nakano, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Nitobe Bunka Coll, Fac Clin Lab Sci, 3-43-16 Nakano,Nakano ku, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
external quality assessment; laboratory accreditation; next-generation sequencing; on-site evaluation; quality assurance;
D O I
10.1002/jcla.24901
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
BackgroundAs next-generation sequencing (NGS) oncology tests vary by platform, application, and target of genes, specific methods for external quality assessment (EQA) have not been universally applied. Hence, we have attempted to implement on-site evaluation as EQA in the accreditation program under ISO 15189 for laboratories that perform NGS oncology tests. MethodsA total of 10 laboratories that performed NGS oncology tests were enrolled. Two types of EQA samples were prepared (Acrometrix Oncology Hotspot Control DNA and OncoSpan gDNA DNA samples), and the variant allele frequency of targeted genes was assigned. The samples were subjected to NGS oncology tests in participant laboratories according to their routine protocols. Based on the result reports, auditors visited the participant laboratories to perform on-site evaluations and provided feedback regarding possible laboratory process improvement. ResultsThe participant laboratories identified the targeted variants in the Acrometrix Oncology Hotspot Control DNA and OncoSpan gDNA samples with a success rate of 31-100% and 9.5-100%, respectively, compared with reference information, depending on their sequencing systems, and reported a few lower-variant allele frequencies. Six of the eight evaluated laboratories failed to report at least three pathogenic variants due to errors in wet-lab and/or dry-lab processes. Based on the feedback reports and self-assessment, auditors and laboratory staff discussed potential improvements to processes during on-site evaluations for laboratory accreditations. ConclusionsOn-site evaluation as EQA for NGS oncology tests in the laboratory accreditation program under ISO 15189 was successfully implemented and proved applicable to a broad spectrum of NGS tests.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Applications and analysis of targeted genomic sequencing in cancer studies [J].
Bewicke-Copley, Findlay ;
Kumar, Emil Arjun ;
Palladino, Giuseppe ;
Korfi, Koorosh ;
Wang, Jun .
COMPUTATIONAL AND STRUCTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL, 2019, 17 :1348-1359
[2]   NGS for (Hemato-) Oncology in Belgium: Evaluation of Laboratory Performance and Feasibility of a National External Quality Assessment Program [J].
Delcourt, Thomas ;
Vanneste, Kevin ;
Soumali, Mohamed Rida ;
Coucke, Wim ;
Ghislain, Vanessa ;
Hebrant, Aline ;
Van Valckenborgh, Els ;
De Keersmaecker, Sigrid C. J. ;
Roosens, Nancy H. ;
Van de Walle, Philippe ;
Van den Bulcke, Marc ;
Antoniou, Aline .
CANCERS, 2020, 12 (11) :1-21
[3]   A 2015 update on predictive molecular pathology and its role in targeted cancer therapy: a review focussing on clinical relevance [J].
Dietel, M. ;
Joehrens, K. ;
Laffert, M. V. ;
Hummel, M. ;
Blaeker, H. ;
Pfitzner, B. M. ;
Lehmann, A. ;
Denkert, C. ;
Darb-Esfahani, S. ;
Lenze, D. ;
Heppner, F. L. ;
Koch, A. ;
Sers, C. ;
Klauschen, F. ;
Anagnostopoulos, I. .
CANCER GENE THERAPY, 2015, 22 (09) :417-430
[4]   One byte at a time: evidencing the quality of clinical service next-generation sequencing for germline and somatic variants [J].
Gutowska-Ding, Maria Weronika ;
Deans, Zandra C. ;
Roos, Christophe ;
Matilainen, Jukka ;
Khawaja, Farrah ;
Brugger, Kim ;
Ahn, Jo Wook ;
Boustred, Christopher ;
Patton, Simon J. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2020, 28 (02) :202-212
[5]   Reference standards for next-generation sequencing [J].
Hardwick, Simon A. ;
Deveson, Ira W. ;
Mercer, Tim R. .
NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2017, 18 (08) :473-484
[6]   External quality assessment: best practice [J].
James, David ;
Ames, Darren ;
Lopez, Berenice ;
Still, Rachel ;
Simpson, Wiliam ;
Twomey, Patrick .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2014, 67 (08) :651-655
[7]   Best practices for variant calling in clinical sequencing [J].
Koboldt, Daniel C. .
GENOME MEDICINE, 2020, 12 (01)
[8]   Standardization of Sequencing Coverage Depth in NGS: Recommendation for Detection of Clonal and Subclonal Mutations in Cancer Diagnostics [J].
Petrackova, Anna ;
Vasinek, Michel ;
Sedlarikova, Lenka ;
Dyskova, Tereza ;
Schneiderova, Petra ;
Novosad, Tomas ;
Papajik, Tomas ;
Kriegova, Eva .
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2019, 9
[9]   Enhancing the accuracy of next-generation sequencing for detecting rare and subclonal mutations [J].
Salk, Jesse J. ;
Schmitt, Michael W. ;
Loeb, Lawrence A. .
NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2018, 19 (05) :269-285
[10]  
Schwartzberg Lee, 2017, Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book, V37, P160, DOI 10.14694/EDBK_174176