Capacity Market and Investments in Power Generations: Risk-Averse Decision-Making of Power Producer

被引:2
作者
Makimoto, Naoki [1 ]
Takashima, Ryuta [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tsukuba, Inst Business Sci, Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo 1120012, Japan
[2] Tokyo Univ Sci, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Chiba 2788510, Japan
关键词
capacity market; electricity market; investment in power generation; risk-averse decision making; mean-variance utility; threshold price; ELECTRICITY; REMUNERATION; IMPACT; ENERGY; PRICE;
D O I
10.3390/en16104241
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The penetration of power generations from renewable energy sources into the power market has a significant impact on the capacity factor of existing power generations. This is because power producers cannot recover a capital cost of power generations with high operating cost possibly due to underinvestment. One solution to address this problem includes a capacity mechanism; that is, the capacities of the power generations can be sold through a market or a bilateral contract. Many schemes of the capacity mechanism have been used worldwide. In this study, we examine an investment in a power plant in both the electricity and capacity markets. The effect of investment opportunity on uncertainty and risk aversion is analyzed by a real options approach that is one of analytical methods for investment decisions under uncertainty. The investment timing for the standard energy-only market is compared with that for the capacity market. When the risk averse for the power producer is relatively small, the income in the energy-only market is obtained whereas, when the risk averse is relatively high, the income is gained in both the electricity and capacity markets for the sake of enough profit.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   The impact of investors' risk aversion on the performances of capacity remuneration mechanisms [J].
Abani, Ahmed Ousman ;
Hary, Nicolas ;
Rious, Vincent ;
Saguan, Marcelo .
ENERGY POLICY, 2018, 112 :84-97
[2]   Promoting Solar Panel Investments: Feed-in-Tariff vs. Tax-Rebate Policies [J].
Babich, Volodymyr ;
Lobel, Ruben ;
Yucel, Safak .
M&SOM-MANUFACTURING & SERVICE OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2020, 22 (06) :1148-1164
[3]   Feed-in tariffs with minimum price guarantees and regulatory uncertainty [J].
Barbosa, Luciana ;
Ferrao, Paulo ;
Rodrigues, Artur ;
Sardinha, Alberto .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2018, 72 :517-541
[4]   Dynamic Mean-Variance Asset Allocation [J].
Basak, Suleyman ;
Chabakauri, Georgy .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2010, 23 (08) :2970-3016
[5]   A survey on electricity market design: Insights from theory and real-world implementations of capacity remuneration mechanisms [J].
Bublitz, Andreas ;
Keles, Dogan ;
Zimmermann, Florian ;
Fraunholz, Christoph ;
Fichtner, Wolf .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2019, 80 :1059-1078
[6]   Optimal regime switching under risk aversion and uncertainty [J].
Chronopoulos, Michail ;
Lumbreras, Sara .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2017, 256 (02) :543-555
[7]   Optimal investment under operational flexibility, risk aversion, and uncertainty [J].
Chronopoulos, Michail ;
De Reyck, Bert ;
Siddiqui, Afzal .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2011, 213 (01) :221-237
[8]  
Conejo AJ, 2010, INT SER OPER RES MAN, V153, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-7421-1
[9]   Investment with incomplete markets for risk: The need for long-term contracts [J].
d'Aertrycke, Gauthier de Maere ;
Ehrenmann, Andreas ;
Smeers, Yves .
ENERGY POLICY, 2017, 105 :571-583
[10]   On the optimal stopping problem for one-dimensional diffusions [J].
Dayanik, S ;
Karatzas, L .
STOCHASTIC PROCESSES AND THEIR APPLICATIONS, 2003, 107 (02) :173-212