Incidence and ultrasonographic characteristics of cesarean scar niches after uterine closure by double-layer barbed suture: A prospective comparative study

被引:6
|
作者
Alessandri, Franco [1 ]
Centurioni, Maria Grazia [1 ]
Perrone, Umberto [1 ]
Evangelisti, Giulio [1 ]
Urso, Claudia [1 ,2 ]
Paratore, Marco [1 ,2 ]
Guida, Elisabetta [1 ,2 ]
Nappini, Alice [1 ,2 ]
Gustavino, Claudio [1 ]
Ferrero, Simone [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Barra, Fabio [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS Osped Policlin San Martino, Unit Obstet & Gynecol, Genoa, Italy
[2] Univ Genoa, Dept Neurosci Rehabil Ophthalmol Genet Maternal &, Genoa, Italy
[3] IRCCS Osped Policlin San Martino, Acad Unit Obstet & Gynecol, Genoa, Italy
[4] IRCCS Osped Policlin San Martino, Acad Unit Obstet & Gynecol, Largo R Benzi 10, I-16132 Genoa, Italy
关键词
barbed suture; cesarean scar defects; dysmenorrhea; fishbone suture; monofilament suture; postmenstrual spotting; uterine niches; PREVALENCE; EPIDEMIOLOGY; ULTRASOUND; SECTION;
D O I
10.1002/ijgo.14744
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
ObjectiveTo compare the ultrasonographic features of uterine scars and clinical symptoms after cesarean delivery (CD) using barbed and conventional smooth sutures. MethodsThis case-control study enrolled women who underwent primary CD at 37 weeks of pregnancy or later. The uterus was closed using either double-layer unidirectional barbed suture or conventional double-layer smooth suture. Ultrasound scans of the uterine scar and evaluations of menstrual patterns were performed at 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. ResultsIn all, 102 patients underwent uterine closure with barbed suture, while 135 patients underwent smooth suture. At 6 months, patients in the barbed group had a lower incidence of uterine niches (20.2% vs 32.6%) that were also shallower in depth (P < 0.001). Lower incidence of niches was also observed in the barbed group at 12 and 24 months (P = 0.043 and 0.048, respectively). At these two follow-up times, the smooth group had a higher number of patients reporting postmenstrual spotting (P < 0.05) and more postmenstrual spotting days per month (P < 0.050). ConclusionThe use of double-layer barbed suture during CD was associated with a lower incidence of scar niches and a more favorable menstrual pattern compared with the use of smooth suture.
引用
收藏
页码:895 / 905
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Never Ending Debate Single-Layer Versus Double-Layer Closure of the Uterine Incision at Cesarean Section
    C. V. Hegde
    The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 2014, 64 (4) : 239 - 240
  • [22] EARLY HISTOPATHOLOGICAL COMPARISON OF SINGLE VERSUS DOUBLE-LAYER CLOSURE OF UTERINE INCISION DURING CESAREAN: A CONTROLLED STUDY IN RATS
    Civelek, Merve
    Buyukkurt, Selim
    Yilmaz, Mehmet Bertan
    Erdogan, Kivilcim Eren
    Oksuz, Hale
    Avci, Cagri
    Seydaoglu, Gulsah
    JOURNAL OF ISTANBUL FACULTY OF MEDICINE-ISTANBUL TIP FAKULTESI DERGISI, 2023, 86 (03): : 220 - 226
  • [23] Single- Versus Double-Layer Uterine Closure After Cesarean Section Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Qayum, Kaif
    Kar, Irfan
    Sofi, Junaid
    Panneerselvam, Hari
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 13 (09)
  • [24] A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial of Single vs. Double Layer Closure of Hysterotomy at the Time of Cesarean Delivery: The Effect on Uterine Scar Thickness
    Bamberg, Christian
    Dudenhausen, Joachim W.
    Bujak, Verena
    Rodekamp, Elke
    Brauer, Martin
    Hinkson, Larry
    Kalache, Karim
    Henrich, Wolfgang
    ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN, 2018, 39 (03): : 343 - 351
  • [25] Ultrasound cesarean scar assessment one year postpartum in relation to one- or two-layer uterine suture closure
    Hanacek, Jiri
    Vojtech, Jiri
    Urbankova, Iva
    Krcmar, Michal
    Krepelka, Petr
    Feyereisl, Jaroslav
    Krofta, Ladislav
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2020, 99 (01) : 69 - 78
  • [26] Longitudinal transvaginal ultrasound evaluation of cesarean scar niche incidence and depth in the first two years after single- or double-layer uterotomy closure: a randomized controlled trial
    Bamberg, Christian
    Hinkson, Larry
    Dudenhausen, Joachim W.
    Bujak, Verena
    Kalache, Karim D.
    Henrich, Wolfgang
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2017, 96 (12) : 1484 - 1489
  • [27] Prediction of uterine dehiscence using ultrasonographic parameters of cesarean section scar in the nonpregnant uterus: a prospective observational study
    Pomorski, Michal
    Fuchs, Tomasz
    Zimmer, Mariusz
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2014, 14
  • [28] Ultrasonographic evaluation of lower uterine segment to predict the integrity and quality of cesarean scar during pregnancy: A prospective study
    Qureshi, B
    Inafuku, K
    Oshima, K
    Masamoto, H
    Kanazawa, K
    TOHOKU JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 1997, 183 (01): : 55 - 65
  • [29] Prediction of uterine dehiscence using ultrasonographic parameters of cesarean section scar in the nonpregnant uterus: a prospective observational study
    Michal Pomorski
    Tomasz Fuchs
    Mariusz Zimmer
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 14
  • [30] 62Single-Versus Double-Layer Uterine Closure After Cesarean Section Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Kar, I.
    Qayum, K.
    BJS-BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 109