The preparation for entry into adulthood-supported decision-making in upper secondary school for students with intellectual disability

被引:2
作者
Tideman, Magnus [1 ]
Kristen, Lars [1 ]
Szonyi, Kristina [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Halmstad Univ, Ctr Res Welf Hlth & Sport Cvhi, Sch Hlth & Welf Sci, Halmstad, Sweden
[2] Stockholm Univ, Dept Special Educ, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Active citizen; intellectual disability; supported decision-making; self-determination; upper secondary school;
D O I
10.1080/08856257.2022.2045814
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
The upper secondary school for individuals with intellectual disability should prepare for an adult life as an active citizen with great self-determination and participation in democratic decision-making processes. The extent to which and in what way the schools work to prepare the students and develop their skills are likely of great importance for the students' adult life. The purpose of the study was to increase the knowledge of how students with intellectual disability in Sweden are prepared for adulthood, with special focus on self-determination. Case studies on three schools were carried out through observations of decision-making processes and interviews with students and staff. The main findings consist of three different approaches to self-determination for students with intellectual disability: 'Targeted and Conscious', 'Forward with Uncertainty' and 'Braking and Protecting'. Increased knowledge about, and analyses of, the processes that take place when young people with reduced decision-making capacity, due to intellectual disability, make decisions with the support of others are important. Implications underline the need to strengthen the awareness, knowledge and support of school staff when it comes to strengthening students' decision-making capacity. The students with intellectual disability need to be equipped for a society where they as adults will be surrounded by choices and expectations of making decisions.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 167
页数:13
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Abery B.H., 2003, THEORY SELF DETERMIN, P43
[2]  
Abery B.H., 2018, INCLUSIVE ED STRATEG, P179
[3]   PARTICIPANT OBSERVATION AND INTERVIEWING - A COMPARISON [J].
BECKER, HS ;
GEER, B .
HUMAN ORGANIZATION, 1957, 16 (03) :28-32
[4]  
Blumer H., 1969, SYMB INTERACT
[5]   Clarifying, Operationalising, and Evaluating Supported Decision Making Models [J].
Carney, Terry .
RESEARCH AND PRACTICE IN INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2014, 1 (01) :46-50
[6]  
Charmaz K., 2006, CONSTRUCTING GROUNDE, DOI DOI 10.5565/REV/PAPERS/V86N0.825
[7]   Supported decision making: A review of the international literature [J].
Davidson, Gavin ;
Kelly, Berni ;
Macdonald, Geraldine ;
Rizzo, Maria ;
Lombard, Louise ;
Abogunrin, Oluwaseye ;
Clift-Matthews, Victoria ;
Martin, Alison .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW AND PSYCHIATRY, 2015, 38 :61-67
[8]  
Frithiof E., 2007, MEANING POWER ED CON
[9]  
Glaser BG., 1967, The Discovery of Grounded Theory
[10]   Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness [J].
Graneheim, UH ;
Lundman, B .
NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2004, 24 (02) :105-112