Transformer-based structural seismic response prediction

被引:15
作者
Zhang, Qingyu [1 ,2 ]
Guo, Maozi [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Lingling [3 ]
Li, Yang [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Xinxin [1 ,2 ]
Han, Miao [4 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Civil Engn & Architecture, Sch Elect & Informat Engn, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Key Lab Intelligent Proc Bldg Big Data, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
[3] Harbin Inst Technol, Fac Comp Sci & Technol, Harbin 150001, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Univ Civil Engn & Architecture, Sch Civil & Transportat Engn, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Deterministic structural response prediction; Deep learning; Transformer; LSTM; Moving average;
D O I
10.1016/j.istruc.2024.105929
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Seismic response prediction is a crucial aspect of evaluating the performance of civil structures. Accurate and efficient response prediction is of significance owing to its application ranging from structural design to structural performance evaluation. Nonlinear time history analysis offers precise and deterministic predictions of seismic response. However, its practical application is limited by the significant computational costs and low modeling efficiency associated with this method. Therefore, a novel Deep Learning (DL) based deterministic structural seismic response prediction method is proposed as an alternative to nonlinear time history analysis. This framework adopts the Encoder-Decoder architecture of Transformer, with the Encoder encoding the seismic wave and the Decoder, coupled with a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) neural network, decoding seismic wave encoding features and obtaining preliminary seismic response. Additionally, Moving Average (MA) operation is embedded into the proposed framework, aiming to adjust the preliminary prediction and acquire the final seismic response. Experimental results on four synthetic datasets and one real dataset show that the proposed TLM method has excellent prediction accuracy for both linear and nonlinear systems as well as for linear-elastic and elastoplastic response prediction of structures. Meanwhile, the TLM method is more computationally efficient than traditional numerical methods for solving relatively refined models.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Benchmarking FEMA P-58 repair costs and unsafe placards for the Northridge Earthquake: Implications for performance-based earthquake engineering [J].
Cook, Dustin T. ;
Liel, Abbie B. ;
DeBock, D. Jared ;
Haselton, Curt B. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2021, 56
[2]   Direct identification of reduced building models based on noisy measurements for performance based earthquake engineering [J].
Damikoukas, Spyros ;
Chatzieleftheriou, Stavros ;
Lagaros, Nikos D. .
JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2021, 34
[3]   Seismic Response and Damage of Reduced-Strength Steel MRF Structures with Nonlinear Viscous Dampers [J].
Dong, Baiping ;
Sause, Richard ;
Ricles, James M. .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 144 (12)
[4]  
Orhan AE, 2018, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:1701.09175
[5]  
Hochreiter S, 1997, NEURAL COMPUT, V9, P1735, DOI [10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735, 10.1162/neco.1997.9.1.1, 10.1007/978-3-642-24797-2]
[6]   Performance-based earthquake engineering methodology for seismic analysis of nuclear cable tray system [J].
Huang, Baofeng .
NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 53 (07) :2396-2406
[7]   Earthquake Early Warning System for Structural Drift Prediction Using Machine Learning and Linear Regressors [J].
Iaccarino, Antonio Giovanni ;
Gueguen, Philippe ;
Picozzi, Matteo ;
Ghimire, Subash .
FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE, 2021, 9
[8]   Artificial intelligence in seismology: Advent, performance and future trends [J].
Jiao, Pengcheng ;
Alavi, Amir H. .
GEOSCIENCE FRONTIERS, 2020, 11 (03) :739-744
[9]  
Jidong C, 2022, Structural seismic response analysis programming and application
[10]   Development of Seismic Response Simulation Model for Building Structures with Semi-Active Control Devices Using Recurrent Neural Network [J].
Kim, Hyun-Su .
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (11)