Why is efficiency improvement ineffective in alleviating energy poverty? The nonnegligible rebound effect

被引:4
作者
Zhu, Penghu [1 ]
Lin, Boqiang [2 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ, Inst Blue & Green Dev, Weihai 264209, Peoples R China
[2] Xiamen Univ, China Inst Studies Energy Policy, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Energy Econ & Energy Policy, Sch Management, Xiamen 361005, Fujian, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Energy efficiency; Energy poverty; Rebound effect; Chinese general social survey; CONSUMPTION; CHINA; IMPACTS; DEMAND;
D O I
10.1007/s10479-023-05705-8
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Energy poverty is a crucial challenge to global sustainable development. Energy efficiency is considered an essential means to alleviate energy poverty, but there is still insufficient quantitative evidence on its poverty reduction effect. This paper investigates the impact of energy efficiency on energy poverty and examines the offsetting effect of the rebound effect by applying the Chinese general social survey (CGSS) dataset in 2018. The results show that improving energy efficiency can significantly reduce energy poverty, and that energy demand act as a channel of influence. Moreover, the poverty reduction effect of urban residents is greater than that of rural residents. Furthermore, the rebound effect will significantly reduce the poverty reduction effect of energy efficiency. For China, the rebound effect will reduce the poverty reduction effect by 61.4% on average. These findings are robust after a variety of alternative checks. This paper provides some quantitative insights for dealing with energy poverty.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]   Energy poverty and education: Fresh evidence from a panel of developing countries [J].
Apergis, Nicholas ;
Polemis, Michael ;
Soursou, Simeoni-Eleni .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2022, 106
[2]   Inequality of fear and self-quarantine: Is there a trade-off between GDP and public health? [J].
Aum, Sangmin ;
Lee, Sang Yoon ;
Shin, Yongseok .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2021, 194
[3]   Recognition of and response to energy poverty in the United States [J].
Bednar, Dominic J. ;
Reames, Tony G. .
NATURE ENERGY, 2020, 5 (06) :432-439
[4]   Energy poverty and energy efficiency improvements: A longitudinal approach of the Hellenic households [J].
Boemi, Sofia-Natalia ;
Papadopoulos, Agis M. .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2019, 197 :242-250
[5]   A global perspective on domestic energy deprivation: Overcoming the energy poverty-fuel poverty binary [J].
Bouzarovski, Stefan ;
Petrova, Saska .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2015, 10 :31-40
[6]   Towards a multiple-indicator approach to energy poverty in the European Union: A review [J].
Castano-Rosa, Raul ;
Solis-Guzman, Jaime ;
Rubio-Bellido, Carlos ;
Marrero, Madelyn .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2019, 193 :36-48
[7]   Process analysis of poverty eradication in China: A case study on photovoltaic projects for poverty alleviation [J].
Chang, I-Shin ;
Liu, Huiru ;
Wu, Jing ;
Zhou, Changbo ;
Zheng, Lina .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2021, 90
[8]   Drivers and trajectories of China's renewable energy consumption [J].
Chen, Jiandong ;
Xu, Chong ;
Wu, Yinyin ;
Li, Zihao ;
Song, Malin .
ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2022, 313 (01) :441-459
[9]   Recency and projection biases in air quality valuation by Chinese residents [J].
Chen, Shuai ;
Qin, Ping ;
Tan-Soo, Jie-Sheng ;
Wei, Chu .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 648 :618-630
[10]   Childhood adversity and energy poverty [J].
Cheng, Zhiming ;
Guo, Liwen ;
Smyth, Russell ;
Tani, Massimiliano .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2022, 111