Progressive unsupervised control of myoelectric upper limbs

被引:3
|
作者
Gigli, Andrea [1 ,3 ]
Gijsberts, Arjan
Nowak, Markus [1 ]
Vujaklija, Ivan [2 ]
Castellini, Claudio [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] German Aerosp Ctr DLR, Inst Robot & Mechatron, Wessling, Germany
[2] Aalto Univ, Dept Elect Engn & Automat, Espoo, Finland
[3] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Assist Intelligent Robot Lab, Erlangen, Germany
关键词
coadaptive myocontrol; unsupervised myocontrol; muscle synergies; surface electromyography; motor skill learning; MATRIX FACTORIZATION; MUSCLE SYNERGIES; CHALLENGE POINT; PERFORMANCE; HAND; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; ALGORITHMS; PROSTHESES; FRAMEWORK; AMPUTEES;
D O I
10.1088/1741-2552/ad0754
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Objective. Unsupervised myocontrol methods aim to create control models for myoelectric prostheses while avoiding the complications of acquiring reliable, regular, and sufficient labeled training data. A limitation of current unsupervised methods is that they fix the number of controlled prosthetic functions a priori, thus requiring an initial assessment of the user's motor skills and neglecting the development of novel motor skills over time. Approach. We developed a progressive unsupervised myocontrol (PUM) paradigm in which the user and the control model coadaptively identify distinct muscle synergies, which are then used to control arbitrarily associated myocontrol functions, each corresponding to a hand or wrist movement. The interaction starts with learning a single function and the user may request additional functions after mastering the available ones, which aligns the evolution of their motor skills with an increment in system complexity. We conducted a multi-session user study to evaluate PUM and compare it against a state-of-the-art non-progressive unsupervised alternative. Two participants with congenital upper-limb differences tested PUM, while ten non-disabled control participants tested either PUM or the non-progressive baseline. All participants engaged in myoelectric control of a virtual hand and wrist. Main results. PUM enabled autonomous learning of three myocontrol functions for participants with limb differences, and of all four available functions for non-disabled subjects, using both existing or newly identified muscle synergies. Participants with limb differences achieved similar success rates to non-disabled ones on myocontrol tests, but faced greater difficulties in internalizing new motor skills and exhibited slightly inferior movement quality. The performance was comparable with either PUM or the non-progressive baseline for the group of non-disabled participants. Significance. The PUM paradigm enables users to autonomously learn to operate the myocontrol system, adapts to the users' varied preexisting motor skills, and supports the further development of those skills throughout practice.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] On the Utility of Bioimpedance in the Context of Myoelectric Control
    Hahne, Janne M.
    Markovic, Marko
    Pardo, Luis A., Jr.
    Kusche, Roman
    Ryschka, Martin
    Schilling, Arndt F.
    IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL, 2021, 21 (17) : 19505 - 19515
  • [22] Evaluating Internal Model Strength and Performance of Myoelectric Prosthesis Control Strategies
    Shehata, Ahmed W.
    Scheme, Erik J.
    Sensinger, Jonathon W.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL SYSTEMS AND REHABILITATION ENGINEERING, 2018, 26 (05) : 1046 - 1055
  • [23] A Classification Method for Myoelectric Control of Hand Prostheses Inspired by Muscle Coordination
    Patel, Gauravkumar K.
    Castellini, Claudio
    Hahne, Janne M.
    Farina, Dario
    Dosen, Strahinja
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL SYSTEMS AND REHABILITATION ENGINEERING, 2018, 26 (09) : 1745 - 1755
  • [24] Biofeedback for upper limb myoelectric prostheses
    Davalli, A
    Sacchetti, R
    ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY ON THE THRESHOLD OF THE NEW MILLENNIUM, 1999, 6 : 585 - 589
  • [25] Age-Dependent Upper Limb Myoelectric Control Capability in Typically Developing Children
    Gonzalez, Miguel
    Su, Hao
    Fu, Qiushi
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL SYSTEMS AND REHABILITATION ENGINEERING, 2022, 30 : 1009 - 1018
  • [26] Vibration of the upper limbs in cycling
    Chiementin, X.
    Bertucci, W.
    Crequy, S.
    Bolaers, F.
    Estocq, P.
    COMPUTER METHODS IN BIOMECHANICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 14 : 27 - 28
  • [27] A Review of Proprioceptive Feedback Strategies for Upper-Limb Myoelectric Prostheses
    Lecompte, Olivier
    Achiche, Sofiane
    Mohebbi, Abolfazl
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND BIONICS, 2024, 6 (03): : 930 - 939
  • [28] Towards Enhanced Control of Upper Prosthetic Limbs: A Force-Myographic Approach
    Rasouli, Mahdi
    Chellamuthu, Karthik
    Cabibihan, John-John
    Kukreja, Sunil L.
    2016 6TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOMEDICAL ROBOTICS AND BIOMECHATRONICS (BIOROB), 2016, : 232 - 236
  • [29] Evaluation of EMG pattern recognition for upper limb prosthesis control: a case study in comparison with direct myoelectric control
    Resnik, Linda
    Huang, He
    Winslow, Anna
    Crouch, Dustin L.
    Zhang, Fan
    Wolk, Nancy
    JOURNAL OF NEUROENGINEERING AND REHABILITATION, 2018, 15
  • [30] An investigation into the neuromuscular control at the level of the upper limbs of junior handball girls players
    Teodora-Mihaela, Iconomescu
    Veronica, Mindrescu
    Laurentiu-Gabriel, Talaghir
    ERPA INTERNATIONAL CONGRESSES ON EDUCATION 2015 (ERPA 2015), 2016, 26