Refreshing the emergency medicine research priorities

被引:11
作者
Cottey, Laura [1 ]
Shanahan, Thomas Alexander Gerrard [2 ]
Gronlund, Toto [3 ]
Whiting, Caroline [3 ]
Sokunbi, Moses [4 ]
Carley, Simon David [5 ,6 ]
Smith, Jason [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Royal Ctr Def Med, Acad Dept Mil Emergency Med, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Manchester, Fac Biol Med & Hlth, Sch Med Sci, Manchester, Lancs, England
[3] Univ Southampton, Natl Inst Hlth & Care Res, Sch Healthcare Enterprise & Innovat, James Lind Alliance, Southampton, Hants, England
[4] De Montfort Univ, Fac Hlth & Life Sci, Leicester Sch Allied Hlth Sci, Leicester, Leics, England
[5] Manchester Univ NHS Fdn Trust, Emergency Dept, Manchester, Lancs, England
[6] Manchester Metropolitan Univ, Postgrad Med, Manchester, Lancs, England
[7] Univ Hosp Plymouth NHS Trust, Emergency Dept, Plymouth, England
关键词
research; acute medicine; major trauma management; mental health;
D O I
10.1136/emermed-2022-213019
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe priorities for UK emergency medicine research were defined in 2017 by a priority setting partnership coordinated by the Royal College of Emergency Medicine in collaboration with the James Lind Alliance (JLA). Much has changed in the last 5 years, not least a global infectious disease pandemic and a significant worsening of the crisis in the urgent and emergency care system. Our aim was to review and refresh the emergency medicine research priorities. MethodsA steering group including patients, carers and healthcare professionals was established to agree to the methodology of the refresh. An independent adviser from the JLA chaired the steering group. The scope was adult patients in the ED. New questions were invited via an open call using multiple communications methods ensuring that patients, carers and healthcare professionals had the opportunity to contribute. Questions underwent minisystematic (BestBETs) review to determine if the question had been answered, and the original 2017 priorities were reviewed. Any questions that remained unanswered were included in an interim prioritisation survey, which was distributed to patients, carers and healthcare professionals. Rankings from this survey were reviewed by the steering group and a shortlist of questions put forward to the final workshop, which was held to discuss and rank the research questions in order of priority. Results77 new questions were submitted, of which 58 underwent mini-systematic review. After this process, 49 questions (of which 32 were new, 11 were related to original priorities and 6 unanswered original priorities were carried forward) were reviewed by the steering group and included in an interim prioritisation survey. The interim prioritisation survey attracted 276 individual responses. 26 questions were shortlisted for discussion at the final prioritisation workshop, where the top 10 research priorities were agreed. ConclusionWe have redefined the priorities for emergency medicine research in the UK using robust and established methodology, which will inform the agenda for the coming years.
引用
收藏
页码:666 / 670
页数:5
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2022, RCEM ACUTE INSIGHT S
[2]  
Corfield A., 2021, EARLY VASOPRESSORS S
[3]   Need for recovery and physician well-being in emergency departments: national survey findings [J].
Cottey, Laura ;
Roberts, Tom ;
Graham, Blair ;
Horner, Daniel ;
Latour, Jos M. ;
Enki, Doyo ;
Lyttle, Mark D. ;
Stevens, Kara N. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2021, 28 (05) :386-393
[4]   Need for recovery amongst emergency physicians in the UK and Ireland: a cross-sectional survey [J].
Cottey, Laura ;
Roberts, Tom ;
Graham, Blair ;
Horner, Daniel ;
Stevens, Kara Nicola ;
Enki, Doyo ;
Lyttle, Mark David ;
Latour, Jos .
BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (11)
[5]  
Emergency Medicine Refresh PSP Steering Group, 2022, EM MED RES PRIOR RES
[6]   PROcalcitonin and NEWS2 evaluation for Timely identification of sepsis and Optimal use of antibiotics in the emergency department (PRONTO protocol for a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial [J].
Euden, Joanne ;
Thomas-Jones, Emma ;
Aston, Stephen ;
Brookes-Howell, Lucy ;
Carman, Julie ;
Carrol, Enitan ;
Gilbert, Stephanie ;
Howard, Philip ;
Hood, Kerenza ;
Inada-Kim, Matthew ;
Llewelyn, Martin ;
McGill, Fiona ;
Milosevic, Sarah ;
Niessen, Louis Wihelmus ;
Nsutebu, Emmanuel ;
Pallmann, Philip ;
Schmidt, Paul ;
Taylor-Robinson, David ;
Welters, Ingeborg ;
Todd, Stacy ;
French, Neil .
BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (06)
[7]  
Fuller G., 2022, MAJOR TRAUMA TRIAGE
[8]   Diagnostic accuracy of prehospital triage tools for identifying major trauma in elderly injured patients: A systematic review [J].
Fuller, Gordon ;
Pandor, Abdullah ;
Essat, Munira ;
Sabir, Lisa ;
Buckley-Woods, Helen ;
Chatha, Hridesh ;
Holt, Chris ;
Keating, Samuel ;
Turner, Janette .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2021, 90 (02) :403-412
[9]   Risk of significant traumatic brain injury in adults with minor head injury taking direct oral anticoagulants: a cohort study and updated meta-analysis [J].
Fuller, Gordon ;
Sabir, Lisa ;
Evans, Rachel ;
Bradbury, Daniel ;
Kuczawski, Maxine ;
Mason, Suzanne M. .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2020, 37 (11) :666-673
[10]  
Goodacre S., 2019, ACCURACY IMPACT COST