The autocrat's intelligence paradox: Vladimir Putin's (mis)management of Russian strategic assessment in the Ukraine War

被引:15
作者
Dylan, Huw [1 ,2 ]
Gioe, David V. [1 ]
Grossfeld, Elena [1 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, London, England
[2] Kings Coll London, London WC2R, England
关键词
cognitive bias; intelligence failure; statecraft; strategic intelligence; Ukraine War; Vladimir Putin;
D O I
10.1177/13691481221146113
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
Autocratic leaders rely on intelligence machineries for regime and personal security. They often manage large, powerful, unaccountable organisations, which they hold close. But, despite their close relationship with - and reliance upon - intelligence, autocrats also frequently struggle to use it to enhance decision-making and foreign policy, and consequently suffer avoidable intelligence failures. This article argues that Russia's invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 is illustrative of this broader, though understudied, pattern of autocratic mismanagement of strategic intelligence. The invasion was both spurred and accompanied by a catastrophic intelligence failure, the responsibility for which rests with Vladimir Putin, the arbiter of a system with limited capacity to offer dispassionate strategic assessments. His failure is characteristic of autocratic regimes assessing foreign developments, including Putin's Soviet predecessors. This article contributes to the emerging scholarship on intelligence in autocratic regimes by examining Putin's use of intelligence in the Ukraine War in the context of the broader literature on intelligence and decision.
引用
收藏
页码:385 / 404
页数:20
相关论文
共 99 条
[1]   The HUMINT Offensive from Putin ' s Chekist State [J].
Anderson, Julie .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENCE AND COUNTERINTELLIGENCE, 2007, 20 (02) :258-316
[2]  
Andrew C., 2004, Intelligence National Security, V19, P170, DOI DOI 10.1080/0268452042000302949
[3]  
Andrew C., 2015, The Mitrokhin Archive: The KGB in Europe and the West
[4]  
Andrew C., 2003, Redefining Stalinism, P69
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Human Rights Watch
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2021, AGENTURA
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1985, IR FOR INT SEC SERV
[8]  
[Anonymous], HOUSE COMMONS HAN 25
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2022, The Economist
[10]  
Antonova N., 2021, FOREIGN POLICY 0115