Feasibility and safety of laparoscopic 3-port cholecystectomy using the LiVac retractor: a prospective cohort study

被引:0
作者
Beltzer, Christian [1 ]
Burghard, Alex [1 ]
Kuhnert, Nicolas [1 ]
Schmidt, Roland [1 ]
机构
[1] German Armed Forces Hosp Ulm, Dept Gen Visceral & Thorac Surg, Ulm, Germany
关键词
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC); reduced port cholecystectomy; LiVac retractor; internal liver retractor; SURGICAL COMPLICATIONS; SINGLE-INCISION; CLASSIFICATION; METAANALYSIS; GUIDELINES; STANDARD;
D O I
10.21037/ales-22-48
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is a highly standardized procedure, which is usually performed using 4 ports. LC in reduced 3-port technique with the internal vacuum-based LiVac retractor has hardly been investigated so far. The aim of our study was to evaluate the 3-port cholecystectomy using the LiVac retractor with focus on surgical feasibility and patient safety. Methods: Treatment data from 25 patients undergoing LC using the 3-port technique with the LiVac retractor (group 1) were prospectively collected. Postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification) were defined as the primary outcome. Pain scores, laboratory values and surgical handling of the LiVac system were the secondary outcome. Surgical handling was evaluated using a standardized questionnaire (grading from 1-6; 1= very good, 6= absolutely insufficient). Data of the prospective LiVac cohort were compared with a retrospective reference cohort of 50 patients with 4-port cholecystectomy of the same time period (group 2). Results: The rate of postoperative complications did not differ significantly (all grades; group 1: 16% vs. group 2: 10%; P= 0.451). Patients in group 1 had significantly prolonged operative time ( group 1: 99 minutes vs. group 2: 75 minutes; P=0.008). An additional fourth port had to be inserted in 60% of all LiVac cholecystectomies; 54% of surgeons reported relevant problems with LiVac use. Conclusions: The use of the LiVac retractor in laparoscopic 3-port cholecystectomy was found to be feasible. However, it was associated with a prolonged operation time, limited exposure of the operative field, and only moderate user satisfaction. The 3-port procedure using the LiVac retractor did not result in any patient benefits compared to conventional 4-port cholecystectomy. Thus, LC using 4 ports should be preferred. However, a prospective randomized comparative study would be needed for final evaluation.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Asakuma Mitsuhiro, 2016, Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi, V117, P364
[2]   Surgical treatment and outcome of iatrogenic bile duct lesions after cholecystectomy and the impact of different clinical classification systems [J].
Bektas, H. ;
Schrem, H. ;
Winny, M. ;
Klempnauerl, J. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 94 (09) :1119-1127
[3]   Clinical value of alternative technologies to standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy - single port, reduced port, robotics, NOTES [J].
Berlet, M. ;
Jell, A. ;
Bulian, D. ;
Friess, H. ;
Wilhelm, D. .
CHIRURGIE, 2022, 93 (06) :566-576
[4]   The standard of laparoscopic cholecystectomy [J].
Bittner, R .
LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2004, 389 (03) :157-163
[5]  
Chiung Ta Lu T, 2021, JSLS, V25
[6]   The Clavien-Dindo Classification of Surgical Complications Five-Year Experience [J].
Clavien, Pierre A. ;
Barkun, Jeffrey ;
de Oliveira, Michelle L. ;
Vauthey, Jean Nicolas ;
Dindo, Daniel ;
Schulick, Richard D. ;
de Santibanes, Eduardo ;
Pekolj, Juan ;
Slankamenac, Ksenija ;
Bassi, Claudio ;
Graf, Rolf ;
Vonlanthen, Rene ;
Padbury, Robert ;
Cameron, John L. ;
Makuuchi, Masatoshi .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2009, 250 (02) :187-196
[7]   Classification of surgical complications - A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey [J].
Dindo, D ;
Demartines, N ;
Clavien, PA .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 240 (02) :205-213
[8]   A clinical study of the LiVac laparoscopic liver retractor system [J].
Gan, Philip ;
Bingham, Judy .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2016, 30 (02) :789-796
[9]  
Gan PS, 2016, JSLS, V20
[10]   Meta-analysis of single-port versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy comparing body image and cosmesis [J].
Haueter, R. ;
Schutz, T. ;
Raptis, D. A. ;
Clavien, P. -A. ;
Zuber, M. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 104 (09) :1141-1159