Deep learning MRI-only synthetic-CT generation for pelvis, brain and head and neck cancers

被引:15
作者
Bird, David [1 ]
Speight, Richard [1 ]
Andersson, Sebastian [2 ]
Wingqvist, Jenny [2 ]
Al-Qaisieh, Bashar [1 ]
机构
[1] Leeds Teaching Hosp NHS Trust, Leeds Canc Ctr, Leeds LS9 7TF, England
[2] RaySearch AB, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
MRI-only; H & N; Brain; Pelvis; MRI; CycleGAN; sCT; Synthetic-CT;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2023.110052
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: MRI-only planning relies on dosimetrically accurate synthetic-CT (sCT) generation to allow dose calculation. Here we validated the dosimetric accuracy of sCTs generated using a deep learning algorithm for pelvic, brain and head and neck (H&N) cancer sites using variable MRI data from multiple scanners.Methods: sCT generation models were trained using a cycle-GAN algorithm, using paired MRI-CT patient data. Input MRI sequences were: T2 for pelvis, T1 with gadolinium (T1Gd) and T2 FLAIR for brain and T1 for H&N. Patient validation sCTs were generated for each site (49 - pelvis, 25 - brain and 30 - H&N). VMAT plans, following local clinical protocols, were calculated on planning CTs and recalculated on sCTs. HU and dosimetric differences were assessed, including DVH differences and gamma index (2 %/2mm).Results: Mean absolute error (MAE) HU differences were; 48.8 HU (pelvis), 118 HU (T2 FLAIR brain), 126 HU (T1Gd brain) and 124 HU (H&N). Mean primary PTV D95% dose differences for all sites were < 0.2 % (range: -0.9 to 1.0 %). Mean 2 %/2mm and 1 %/1mm gamma pass rates for all sites were > 99.6 % (min: 95.3 %) and > 97.3 % (min: 80.1 %) respectively. For all OARs for all sites, mean dose differences were < 0.4 %.Conclusion: Generated sCTs had excellent dosimetric accuracy for all sites and sequences. The cycle-GAN model, available on the research version of a commercial treatment planning system, is a feasible method for sCT generation with high clinical utility due to its ability to use variable input data from multiple scanners and sequences.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   A Systematic Review of the Clinical Implementation of Pelvic Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Only Planning for External Beam Radiation Therapy [J].
Bird, David ;
Henry, Ann M. ;
Sebag-Montefiore, David ;
Buckley, David L. ;
Al-Qaisieh, Bashar ;
Speight, Richard .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2019, 105 (03) :479-492
[2]   Evaluation of a commercial synthetic computed tomography generation solution for magnetic resonance imaging-only radiotherapy [J].
Gonzalez-Moya, A. ;
Dufreneix, S. ;
Ouyessad, N. ;
Guillerminet, C. ;
Autret, D. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 22 (06) :191-197
[3]   The rationale for MR-only treatment planning for external radiotherapy [J].
Jonsson, Joakim ;
Nyholm, Tufve ;
Soderkvist, Karin .
CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2019, 18 :60-65
[4]  
Kohler M., 2015, MR-only simulation for radiotherapy planning
[5]  
Koninklijke Philips, 2021, MRCAT Head and Neck.
[6]  
Koninklijke Philips, 2019, MRCAT Brain.
[7]   Prospective Clinical Feasibility Study for MRI-Only Brain Radiotherapy [J].
Lerner, Minna ;
Medin, Joakim ;
Jamtheim Gustafsson, Christian ;
Alkner, Sara ;
Olsson, Lars E. .
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 11
[8]  
medical.spectronic, Spectronics Medical - MRI Planner
[9]   MRI-only treatment planning: benefits and challenges [J].
Owrangi, Amir M. ;
Greer, Peter B. ;
Glide-Hurst, Carri K. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2018, 63 (05)
[10]   Synthetic computed tomography data allows for accurate absorbed dose calculations in a magnetic resonance imaging only workflow for head and neck radiotherapy [J].
Palmer, Emilia ;
Karlsson, Anna ;
Nordstrom, Fredrik ;
Petruson, Karin ;
Siversson, Carl ;
Ljungberg, Maria ;
Sohlin, Maja .
PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2021, 17 :36-42