Do key measurement parameters derived from specific cervical vertebral segments differ between lordotic and non-lordotic cervical spine alignments? A study of asymptomatic young adults

被引:1
作者
Daffin, Lee [1 ,3 ]
Stuelcken, Max C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Murdoch Univ, Sch Allied Hlth, 90 South St, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
[2] Univ Sunshine Coast UniSC, Sch Hlth, 90 Sippy Downs Dr, Sippy Downs, Qld 4556, Australia
[3] Murdoch Univ, 90 South St, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
关键词
Cervical spine alignment; C0-C2; angle; C2; slope; C7; SAGITTAL ALIGNMENT; POSTURE; BALANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbmt.2023.11.009
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Background: Measurement parameters derived from specific cervical vertebral segments (e.g., C2 slope) can provide clinicians with important information on cervical sagittal balance and guide pre- and post-surgical decision-making processes. It is unclear however, what constitutes typical values for these types of measurements in an asymptomatic population of young adults, whether values change depending upon the classification of the cervical spine's global alignment, and if any non-lordotic cervical subtypes display values that are comparable to those reported for pre-surgery patients. Methods: Neutral lateral cervical radiographs of 150 asymptomatic participants (18-30 years) were taken. Global cervical alignment was classified as lordotic or one of four non-lordotic subtypes using a multi-method subtyping protocol. Four key measurement parameters - the anterior translation of the head measure (ATHM), C0-C2 angle, C2 slope, and C7 slope - were derived from specific cervical segments. Independent samples t-tests were used to compare lordotic and non-lordotic groups.Results: There was considerable variation in the four key measurement parameters amongst this asymptomatic population of young adults. Thirty-four percent of the sample were classified as lordotic and 66% were classified as non-lordotic. There was a significant difference (p <= 0.0125) between lordotic and non-lordotic groups for the C0-C2 angle, C2 slope and C7 slope. There was no difference between groups for the ATHM (p >= 0.0125). Within the non-lordotic group, the global-kyphotic (GK) subtype had the largest mean C2 slope, largest mean C0-C2 angle, and smallest mean C7 slope. Conclusions: Long term prospective investigations are required to determine whether possible biomarkers (alignment parameters/radiological measurements) for spinal degenerative changes can be identified so that early interventions can be put in place to try and reduce the impact of neck pain on society.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 120
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Cervical spine alignment in the pediatric population: a radiographic normative study of 150 asymptomatic patients [J].
Abelin-Genevois, K. ;
Idjerouidene, A. ;
Roussouly, P. ;
Vital, J. M. ;
Garin, C. .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2014, 23 (07) :1442-1448
[2]   Cervical Radiographical Alignment Comprehensive Assessment Techniques and Potential Importance in Cervical Myelopathy [J].
Ames, Christopher P. ;
Blondel, Benjamin ;
Scheer, Justin K. ;
Schwab, Frank J. ;
Le Huec, Jean-Charles ;
Massicotte, Eric M. ;
Patel, Alpesh A. ;
Traynelis, Vincent C. ;
Kim, Han Jo ;
Shaffrey, Christopher I. ;
Smith, Justin S. ;
Lafage, Virginie .
SPINE, 2013, 38 (22) :S149-S160
[3]   Principal Radiographic Characteristics for Cervical Spinal Deformity [J].
Bao, Hongda ;
Varghese, Jeffrey ;
Lafage, Renaud ;
Liabaud, Barthelemy ;
Diebo, Bassel ;
Ramchandran, Subaraman ;
Day, Louis ;
Jalai, Cyrus ;
Cruz, Dana ;
Errico, Thomas ;
Protopsaltis, Themistocles ;
Passias, Peter ;
Buckland, Aaron ;
Qiu, Yong ;
Schwab, Frank ;
Lafage, Virginie .
SPINE, 2017, 42 (18) :1375-1382
[4]   Use of C7 Slope as a Surrogate Marker for T1 Slope: A Radiographic Study in Patients with and without Cervical Deformity [J].
Chugh, Arunit J. S. ;
Patel, Mohit ;
Gerges, Christina ;
Sunshine, Kerrin ;
Wilson, Betsy ;
Kasliwal, Manish K. .
WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 143 :E516-E522
[5]  
Cohen L, 2017, SCOLIOSIS SPINAL DIS, V12, DOI 10.1186/s13013-017-0135-x
[6]   The effect of cervical spine subtypes on center of pressure parameters in a large asymptomatic young adult population [J].
Daffin, Lee ;
Stuelcken, Max C. ;
Sayers, Mark G. L. .
GAIT & POSTURE, 2019, 67 :112-116
[7]  
Daffin L, 2017, J CRANIOVERTEBRAL JU, V8, P231, DOI 10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_84_17
[8]   Comparisons of lordotic cervical spine curvatures to a theoretical ideal model of the static sagittal cervical spine [J].
Harrison, DD ;
Janik, TJ ;
Troyanovich, SJ ;
Holland, B .
SPINE, 1996, 21 (06) :667-675
[9]   Repeatability over time of posture, radiograph positioning, and radiograph line drawing: An analysis of six control groups [J].
Harrison, DE ;
Harrison, DD ;
Colloca, CJ ;
Betz, J ;
Janik, TJ ;
Holland, B .
JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2003, 26 (02) :87-98
[10]   Impact of Cervical Sagittal Alignment Parameters on Neck Disability [J].
Iyer, Sravisht ;
Nemani, Venu M. ;
Joseph Nguyen ;
Elysee, Jonathan ;
Burapachaisri, Aonnicha ;
Ames, Christopher P. ;
Kim, Han Jo .
SPINE, 2016, 41 (05) :371-377