Auctions in payments for ecosystem services and the plural values of nature?

被引:5
作者
Leimona, Beria [1 ]
Bingham, Logan R. [2 ]
Jarungrattanapong, Rawadee [3 ]
van Noordwijk, Meine [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Int Forestry Res & World Agroforestry CIFOR IC, Bogor, Indonesia
[2] Tech Univ Munich, Sch Life Sci, Munich, Germany
[3] Sukhothai Thammathirat Open Univ, Bangkok, Thailand
[4] Wageningen Univ & Res, Plant Prod Syst, Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES; DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES; LESSONS; PARTICIPATION; INFORMATION; INCENTIVES; EFFICIENT; BONUSES; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101334
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Payment for ecosystem service (PES) contracts encounters several challenges, encompassing information asymmetry in determining appropriate pricing, communication gaps involving multiple motivations and the evolving societal norms surrounding sustainability for voluntary contracts. Auctions serve as mechanisms for competitively awarding such contracts. However, their application and analysis have predominantly focused on their economic efficiency in overcoming information asymmetries and providing transparency in contract allocation. This instrumental perspective often overlooks the relational and intrinsic values that underlie PES contracts. By recognising PES auctions as multilayered processes of integrated valuation for nature, PES auctions can contribute to allocating resources efficiently, establishing new social relationships and restructuring existing ones while also providing opportunities for innovations.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 63 条
[21]  
Grafton R. Q., 2021, A Global Analysis of the Cost-efficiency of Forest Carbon Sequestration
[22]  
Howard G.E., 2021, 2021 ANN M, P41
[23]   The Implications of Learning on Bidding Behavior in a Repeated First Price Conservation Auction with Targeting [J].
James, Natasha ;
Lundberg, Liv ;
Sills, Erin .
STRATEGIC BEHAVIOR AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 9 (1-2) :69-101
[24]  
Jarungrattanapong R, 2017, Co-investment in Ecosystem Services: Global Lessons from Payment and Incentive Schemes
[25]  
Jindal R., 2006, Carbon sequestration projects in Africa: Potential benefits and challenges to scaling up, P1
[26]   Social dimensions of procurement auctions for environmental service contracts: Evaluating tradeoffs between cost-effectiveness and participation by the poor in rural Tanzania [J].
Jindal, Rohit ;
Kerr, John M. ;
Ferraro, Paul J. ;
Swallow, Brent M. .
LAND USE POLICY, 2013, 31 :71-80
[27]   Auctioning approaches for ecosystem services-Evidence and applications [J].
Kindu, Mengistie ;
Mai, Trang Le Ngoc ;
Bingham, Logan Robert ;
Borges, Jose G. ;
Abildtrup, Jens ;
Knoke, Thomas .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 853
[28]   Payments for environmental services in Indonesia: What if economic signals were lost in translation? [J].
Lapeyre, Renaud ;
Pirard, Romain ;
Leimona, Beria .
LAND USE POLICY, 2015, 46 :283-291
[29]  
Latacz-Lohmann U, 2005, Auctions for Conservation Contracts: A Review of the Theoritical and Empirical Literature, P1
[30]  
Leimona B, 2018, A Business Case: Co-investing for Ecosystem Service Provisions and Local Livelihoods in Rejoso Watershed