Auctions in payments for ecosystem services and the plural values of nature?

被引:5
作者
Leimona, Beria [1 ]
Bingham, Logan R. [2 ]
Jarungrattanapong, Rawadee [3 ]
van Noordwijk, Meine [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Int Forestry Res & World Agroforestry CIFOR IC, Bogor, Indonesia
[2] Tech Univ Munich, Sch Life Sci, Munich, Germany
[3] Sukhothai Thammathirat Open Univ, Bangkok, Thailand
[4] Wageningen Univ & Res, Plant Prod Syst, Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES; DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES; LESSONS; PARTICIPATION; INFORMATION; INCENTIVES; EFFICIENT; BONUSES; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101334
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Payment for ecosystem service (PES) contracts encounters several challenges, encompassing information asymmetry in determining appropriate pricing, communication gaps involving multiple motivations and the evolving societal norms surrounding sustainability for voluntary contracts. Auctions serve as mechanisms for competitively awarding such contracts. However, their application and analysis have predominantly focused on their economic efficiency in overcoming information asymmetries and providing transparency in contract allocation. This instrumental perspective often overlooks the relational and intrinsic values that underlie PES contracts. By recognising PES auctions as multilayered processes of integrated valuation for nature, PES auctions can contribute to allocating resources efficiently, establishing new social relationships and restructuring existing ones while also providing opportunities for innovations.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 63 条
  • [1] Motivational Crowding in Sustainable Development Interventions
    Agrawal, Arun
    Chhatre, Ashwini
    Gerber, Elisabeth R.
    [J]. AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2015, 109 (03) : 470 - 487
  • [2] Auction Design for the Private Provision of Public Goods in Developing Countries: Lessons from Payments for Environmental Services in Malawi and Indonesia
    Ajayi, Oluyede C.
    Jack, B. Kelsey
    Leimona, Beria
    [J]. WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2012, 40 (06) : 1213 - 1223
  • [3] Amaruzaman S., 2017, Co-investment in ecosystem services: global lessons from payment and incentive schemes
  • [4] Gender aspects in action- and outcome-based payments for ecosystem services-A tree planting field trial in Kenya
    Andeltova, Lucie
    Catacutan, Delia C.
    Wuenscher, Tobias
    Holm-Mueller, Karin
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2019, 35 : 13 - 22
  • [5] Information and Auction Performance: A Laboratory Study of Conservation Auctions for Spatially Contiguous Land Management
    Banerjee, Simanti
    Kwasnica, Anthony M.
    Shortle, James S.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2015, 61 (03) : 409 - 431
  • [6] Barton D N., 2022, Methodological assessment of the diverse values and valuation of nature of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, pXX, DOI [DOI 10.5281/ZENODO.6522261, 10.5281/zenodo.6522261]
  • [7] Ecosystem Services Auctions: The Last Decade of Research
    Bingham, Logan Robert
    Da Re, Riccardo
    Borges, Jose G.
    [J]. FORESTS, 2021, 12 (05):
  • [8] Vittel as a model case in PES discourse: Review and critical perspective
    Bingham, Logan Robert
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2021, 48
  • [9] Bingham Logan Robert, Prospects and Priorities for Ecosystem Services Auctions: Results of an International Expert Consultation Using the Delphi Method, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.4436185, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.4436185]
  • [10] CBD, 2022, CBD/COP/15/L25