Does NIH select the right healthcare ventures through the SBIR grant program?

被引:0
作者
Dutta, Supradeep [1 ]
Rodrigues, Jenna [2 ]
Folta, Timothy B. [3 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, Sch Business, 227 Penn St, Camden, NJ 08102 USA
[2] Univ Connecticut, Sch Business, 2100 Hillside Rd, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
[3] Univ Connecticut, Sch Business, Thomas John & Bette Wolff Family Chair Strateg En, 2100 Hillside Rd, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Federal grants; Selection effect; NIH; Innovation; Natural Experiment; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; DEVELOPMENT SUBSIDIES; INNOVATION; GOVERNMENT; INCENTIVES; CAPITALIST; POLICY;
D O I
10.1007/s10961-022-09964-8
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
One way governments aim to spur entrepreneurship is through providing startup capital to qualified ventures. In the United States, the government does so through federal grant programs like the SBIR/STTR program. Despite the government's efforts to spur entrepreneurship through capital distribution, we don't know much about the selection capabilities that government agencies like the National Institutes of Health (NIH) have in place to choose qualified ventures for funding. Through exploiting a quasi-natural experiment enabled by the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act (ARRA) of 2009, we seek to determine whether the NIH selects ventures with the most innovation and commercialization potential. Overall, our findings suggest that the NIH effectively identifies and prioritizes ventures with superior observable innovation capabilities. Yet, they could do more to discern the underlying tacit value of the innovation to prioritize selecting high-risk ventures that have the potential to create impactful innovation in the future. Our analyses should help policymakers orient their thinking around selection capabilities when assessing the impact of government programs with the broader objective of supporting novel healthcare innovation.
引用
收藏
页码:1206 / 1220
页数:15
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   The effects of public R&D subsidies on firms' innovation activities: The case of Eastern Germany [J].
Almus, M ;
Czarnitzki, D .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & ECONOMIC STATISTICS, 2003, 21 (02) :226-236
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2022, Assessment of the SBIR and STTR Programs at the National Institutes of Health, DOI DOI 10.17226/26376
[3]   Public/private technology partnerships: evaluating SBIR-supported research [J].
Audretsch, DB ;
Link, AN ;
Scott, JT .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2002, 31 (01) :145-158
[4]  
Azoulay P, 2012, W18116 NBER
[5]  
Belz Andrea, 2018, IEEE Engineering Management Review, V46, P75, DOI 10.1109/EMR.2018.2847313
[6]  
Berger M., 2021, Journal of Business Venturing Insights, V16, pe00272, DOI [10.1016/j.jbvi.2021.e00272, DOI 10.1016/J.JBVI.2021.E00272]
[7]   Estimating the NIH Efficient Frontier [J].
Bisias, Dimitrios ;
Lo, Andrew W. ;
Watkins, James F. .
PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (05)
[8]  
Block F., 2015, State of Innovation: The US Governments Role in Technology Development, P9
[9]   Looking Across and Looking Beyond the Knowledge Frontier: Intellectual Distance, Novelty, and Resource Allocation in Science [J].
Boudreau, Kevin J. ;
Guinan, Eva C. ;
Lakhani, Karim R. ;
Riedl, Christoph .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2016, 62 (10) :2765-2783
[10]   Iceberg Alert for NIH [J].
Bourne, Henry R. ;
Lively, Mark O. .
SCIENCE, 2012, 337 (6093) :390-390