Deep learning-based long-term risk evaluation of incident type 2 diabetes using electrocardiogram in a non-diabetic population: a retrospective, multicentre study

被引:1
作者
Kim, Junmo [1 ]
Yang, Hyun-Lim [2 ,3 ]
Kim, Su Hwan [2 ,11 ]
Kim, Siun [2 ]
Lee, Jisoo [1 ]
Ryu, Jiwon [4 ,5 ]
Kim, Kwangsoo [6 ,7 ]
Kim, Zio [1 ]
Ahn, Gun [1 ]
Kwon, Doyun [8 ]
Yoon, Hyung-Jin [1 ,9 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Interdisciplinary Program Bioengn, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Biomed Res Inst, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Internal Med, Bundang Hosp, Coll Med,Div Gen Internal Med, Seongnam, South Korea
[5] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Hosp Med Ctr, Seongnam, South Korea
[6] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Inst Convergence Med Innovat Technol, Dept Transdisciplinary Med, Seoul, South Korea
[7] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Med, Seoul, South Korea
[8] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Interdisciplinary Program Med Informat, Seoul, South Korea
[9] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Med Bigdata Res Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
[10] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Biomed Engn, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[11] Gyeongsang Natl Univ, Dept Informat Stat, Jinju 660701, Gyeongsangnam D, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Deep learning; Type; 2; diabetes; Electrocardiogram; Risk evaluation; MELLITUS; MORBIDITY; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102445
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Diabetes is a major public health concern. We aimed to evaluate the long-term risk of incident type 2 diabetes in a non -diabetic population using a deep learning model (DLM) detecting prevalent type 2 diabetes using electrocardiogram (ECG). Methods In this retrospective study, participants who underwent health checkups at two tertiary hospitals in Seoul, South Korea, between Jan 1, 2001 and Dec 31, 2022 were included. Type 2 diabetes was defined as glucose >= 126 mg/ dL or glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) >= 6.5%. For survival analysis on incident type 2 diabetes, we introduced an additional variable, diabetic ECG, which is determined by the DLM trained on ECG and corresponding prevalent diabetes. It was assumed that non -diabetic individuals with diabetic ECG had a higher risk of incident type 2 diabetes than those with non -diabetic ECG. The one-dimensional ResNet-based model was adopted for the DLM, and the Guided Grad -CAM was used to localise important regions of ECG. We divided the non -diabetic group into the diabetic ECG group (false positive) and the non -diabetic ECG (true negative) group according to the DLM decision, and performed a Cox proportional hazard model, considering the occurrence of type 2 diabetes more than six months after the visit. Findings 190,581 individuals were included in the study with a median follow-up period of 11.84 years. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for prevalent type 2 diabetes detection were 0.816 (0.807-0.825) and 0.762 (0.754-0.770) for the internal and external validations, respectively. The model primarily focused on the QRS duration and, occasionally, P or T waves. The diabetic ECG group exhibited an increased risk of incident type 2 diabetes compared with the non -diabetic ECG group, with hazard ratios of 2.15 (1.82-2.53) and 1.92 (1.74-2.11) for internal and external validation, respectively. Interpretation In the non -diabetic group, those whose ECG was classified as diabetes by the DLM were at a higher risk of incident type 2 diabetes than those whose ECG was not. Additional clinical research on the relationship between the phenotype of ECG and diabetes to support the results and further investigation with tracked data and various ECG recording systems are suggested for future works. Copyright (c) 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY -NC -ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Application of deep convolutional neural network for automated detection of myocardial infarction using ECG signals
    Acharya, U. Rajendra
    Fujita, Hamido
    Oh, Shu Lih
    Hagiwara, Yuki
    Tan, Jen Hong
    Adam, Muhammad
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2017, 415 : 190 - 198
  • [2] ANALYSIS OF SURVIVAL DATA UNDER PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL
    BRESLOW, NE
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL STATISTICAL REVIEW, 1975, 43 (01) : 45 - 58
  • [3] A NEW METHOD OF CLASSIFYING PROGNOSTIC CO-MORBIDITY IN LONGITUDINAL-STUDIES - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION
    CHARLSON, ME
    POMPEI, P
    ALES, KL
    MACKENZIE, CR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (05): : 373 - 383
  • [4] Screening for Diabetes and Prediabetes Should Be Cost-Saving in Patients at High Risk
    Chatterjee, Ranee
    Narayan, K. M. Venkat
    Lipscomb, Joseph
    Jackson, Sandra L.
    Long, Qi
    Zhu, Ming
    Phillips, Lawrence S.
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2013, 36 (07) : 1981 - 1987
  • [5] Screening Adults for Pre-Diabetes and Diabetes May Be Cost-Saving
    Chatterjee, Ranee
    Narayan, K. M. Vencat
    Lipscomb, Joseph
    Phillips, Lawrence S.
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2010, 33 (07) : 1484 - 1490
  • [6] Hyperglycemia Identification Using ECG in Deep Learning Era
    Cordeiro, Renato
    Karimian, Nima
    Park, Younghee
    [J]. SENSORS, 2021, 21 (18)
  • [7] Type 2 Diabetes and Myocardial Infarction: Recent Clinical Evidence and Perspective
    Cui, Jing
    Liu, Yanfei
    Li, Yiwen
    Xu, Fengqin
    Liu, Yue
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2021, 8
  • [8] COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH
    DELONG, ER
    DELONG, DM
    CLARKEPEARSON, DI
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) : 837 - 845
  • [9] Screening for Diabetes in Adults
    Ekoe, Jean-Marie
    Goldenberg, Ronald
    Katz, Pamela
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF DIABETES, 2018, 42 : S16 - S19
  • [10] Fowler MJ, 2008, CLIN DIABETES, V26, P77, DOI [10.2337/diaclin.26.2.77, DOI 10.2337/DIACLIN.26.2.77]