Implications for forest management planning in the Northeast: a systematic map

被引:2
作者
Smith, Ava A. [1 ]
Rittenhouse, Chadwick D. [1 ]
Shoreman-Ouimet, Eleanor [1 ]
Worthley, Thomas E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ CT, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
[2] Univ Connecticut Extens, Storrs, CT USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所; 美国农业部;
关键词
systematic map; conceptual model; content analysis; private forest owners; management planning; FAMILY FORESTS; CONSERVATION; LANDOWNERS; OWNERS; STEWARDSHIP; PERCEPTIONS; AGREEMENT; IDENTITY; BEHAVIOR; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1080/09640568.2024.2303745
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Private forest owners influence future forest cover, health, and connectivity in the landscape. A forest management plan can promote effective stewardship by clearly specifying goals, objectives, and strategies; however, nationally, few forest owners have a written plan for their land, suggesting barriers to participation in management planning processes. We constructed a systematic map of research conducted within the Northeast US between 1990 and 2020 to identify topical themes, explorations into planning barriers, and potential leverage points to planning. We document an emphasis on identifying characteristics of private forest owners, management intensity, and landowner decision influences. Subsequent content analysis revealed a tenuous understanding of planning influences and motivations, and qualitative coding identified funding, current forest conditions, and carbon markets as potential leverage points to influence planning participation. Our findings emphasize the need for focused investigation surrounding forest owner perspectives of management planning and policy tools to remedy knowledge gaps.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 103 条
  • [31] Private land conservation decision-making: An integrative social science model
    Epanchin-Niell, Rebecca S.
    Jackson-Smith, Douglas B.
    Wilson, Robyn S.
    Ashenfarb, Matthew
    Dayer, Ashley A.
    Hillis, Vicken
    Iacona, Gwenllian D.
    Markowitz, Ezra M.
    Marquart-Pyatt, Sandra T.
    Treakle, Tyler
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 302
  • [32] Esterberg K.G., 2002, Qualitative Methods in Social Research.
  • [33] Fegel T, 2018, J EXT, V56
  • [34] European private forest owner typologies: A review of methods and use
    Ficko, Andrej
    Lidestav, Gun
    Dhubhain, Aine Ni
    Karppinen, Heimo
    Zivojinovic, Ivana
    Westin, Kerstin
    [J]. FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2019, 99 : 21 - 31
  • [35] Finley AO, 2006, FOREST SCI, V52, P10
  • [36] The effectiveness of social marketing in global health: a systematic review
    Firestone, Rebecca
    Rowe, Cassandra J.
    Modi, Shilpa N.
    Sievers, Dana
    [J]. HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING, 2017, 32 (01) : 110 - 124
  • [37] Cross-boundary cooperation for landscape management: Collective action and social exchange among individual private forest landowners
    Fischer, Alexandra Paige
    Klooster, Andrew
    Cirhigiri, Lora
    [J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2019, 188 : 151 - 162
  • [38] Factors associated with family forest owner actions: A vote-count meta-analysis
    Floress, Kristin
    Huff, Emily S.
    Snyder, Stephanie A.
    Koshollek, Alanna
    Butler, Sarah
    Allred, Shorna B.
    [J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2019, 188 : 19 - 29
  • [39] Factors influencing the use of consulting foresters by non-industrial private forest landowners in Mississippi
    Godar Chhetri, Sagar
    Gordon, Jason S.
    Munn, Ian A.
    Henderson, James E.
    [J]. FORESTRY CHRONICLE, 2018, 94 (03) : 254 - 259
  • [40] Achievable future conditions as a framework for guiding forest conservation and management
    Golladay, S. W.
    Martin, K. L.
    Vose, J. M.
    Wear, D. N.
    Covich, A. P.
    Hobbs, R. J.
    Klepzig, K. D.
    Likens, G. E.
    Naiman, R. J.
    Shearer, A. W.
    [J]. FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 360 : 80 - 96