Effects of hormone receptor status on patient clinic and survival in HER2 positive breast cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Yilmaz, Mukaddes [1 ,5 ]
Erdis, Eda [2 ]
Ucar, Mahmut [1 ]
Demir, Necla [3 ]
Alandag, Celal [4 ]
Yucel, Birsen [2 ]
机构
[1] Cumhuriyet Univ, Dept Med Oncol, Fac Med, Sivas, Turkiye
[2] Cumhuriyet Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Fac Med, Sivas, Turkiye
[3] Acibadem Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Kayseri, Turkiye
[4] Medicana Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Sivas, Turkiye
[5] Cumhuriyet Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med Oncol, M Fethi Akyuz St 8, TR-58000 Sivas, Turkiye
关键词
breast cancer; HER2; hormone receptor; survival; clinical features; ENDOCRINE RESISTANCE; EXPRESSION; ESTROGEN; AMPLIFICATION; SUBTYPES;
D O I
10.1093/jjco/hyae010
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background In the current study, the effect of hormone receptor (HR) status on clinical and survival in early-stage human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer was investigated. Methods Two hundred ninety-one patients with HER2- positive were examined in two categories as HR-positive and HR-negative. Results Of these, 197 (68%) were HR-positive and 94 (32%) were HR-negative with a mean follow-up period of 68 +/- 2.7 months. The groups were found to be similar in terms of age, menopausal status, comorbidity, pathologic type, stage, T stage, N stage, lymphovascular invasion, presence and percentage of intraductal component, multicentricity/focality and extracapsular invasion. Family history (P = 0.038), stage 2 tumor rate (P < 0.001), and perineural invasion (P = 0.005) were significantly higher in the HR-positive group. In the HR-negative group, mean Ki-67 value (P = 0.014), stage 3 tumor rate (P < 0.001), tumor necrosis (P = 0.004) and strong (3+) HER2 staining on immunohistochemical staining (P = 0.003) were higher. The incidence of relapse and metastasis, and the localization of metastasis were similar in both patient groups. The rate of locoregional relapse during the first 2 years was higher in the HR-negative patients than in the HR-positive patients (P = 0.023). Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) did not differ between the groups in univariate analysis. However, HR status was determined as an independent prognostic factor (HR: 2.11, 95% CI: 1.17-3.79; P = 0.012) for OS was not found to be significant for DFS in multivariate analysis. Conclusion Both clinicopathologic features and OS outcomes of HR-negative patients were worse than those of HR-positive patients.
引用
收藏
页码:521 / 529
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The HER2 amplicon includes several genes required for the growth and survival of HER2 positive breast cancer cells
    Sahlberg, Kristine Kleivi
    Hongisto, Vesa
    Edgren, Henrik
    Makela, Rami
    Hellstrom, Kirsi
    Due, Eldri U.
    Vollan, Hans Kristian Moen
    Sahlberg, Niko
    Wolf, Maija
    Borresen-Dale, Anne-Lise
    Perala, Merja
    Kallioniemi, Olli
    MOLECULAR ONCOLOGY, 2013, 7 (03) : 392 - 401
  • [22] Influence of vitamin D signaling on hormone receptor status and HER2 expression in breast cancer
    Xi Zhang
    Nadia Harbeck
    Udo Jeschke
    Sophie Doisneau-Sixou
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 2017, 143 : 1107 - 1122
  • [23] Influence of vitamin D signaling on hormone receptor status and HER2 expression in breast cancer
    Zhang, Xi
    Harbeck, Nadia
    Jeschke, Udo
    Doisneau-Sixou, Sophie
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 143 (07) : 1107 - 1122
  • [24] Experts' opinion: Recommendations for retesting breast cancer metastases for HER2 and hormone receptor status
    Penault-Llorca, Frederique
    Coudry, Renata A.
    Hanna, Wedad M.
    Osamura, Robert Y.
    Rueschoff, Josef
    Viale, Giuseppe
    BREAST, 2013, 22 (02) : 200 - 202
  • [25] Characterization of Hormone Receptor and HER2 Status in Breast Cancer Using Mass Spectrometry Imaging
    Goncalves, Juliana Pereira Lopes
    Bollwein, Christine
    Noske, Aurelia
    Jacob, Anne
    Jank, Paul
    Loibl, Sibylle
    Nekljudova, Valentina
    Fasching, Peter A. A.
    Karn, Thomas
    Marme, Frederik
    Mueller, Volkmar
    Schem, Christian
    Sinn, Bruno Valentin
    Stickeler, Elmar
    van Mackelenbergh, Marion
    Schmitt, Wolfgang D. D.
    Denkert, Carsten
    Weichert, Wilko
    Schwamborn, Kristina
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2023, 24 (03)
  • [26] HER2 overexpression and activation, and tamoxifen efficacy in receptor-positive early breast cancer
    Singer, Christian F.
    Gschwantler-Kaulich, Daphne
    Fink-Retter, Anneliese
    Pfeiler, Georg
    Walter, Ingrid
    Hudelist, Gernot
    Helmy, Samir
    Spiess, Anne-Catherine
    Lamm, Wolfgang
    Kubista, Ernst
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 135 (06) : 807 - 813
  • [27] HER2 status and disparities in luminal breast cancers
    Holowatyj, Andreana N.
    Ruterbusch, Julie J.
    Ratnam, Manohar
    Gorski, David H.
    Cote, Michele L.
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2016, 5 (08): : 2109 - 2116
  • [28] Immunohistochemical Profile of Breast Cancer With Respect to Estrogen Receptor and HER2 Status
    Gloyeske, Nika C.
    Woodard, Anna H.
    Elishaev, Esther
    Yu, Jing
    Clark, Beth Z.
    Dabbs, David J.
    Bhargava, Rohit
    APPLIED IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR MORPHOLOGY, 2015, 23 (03) : 202 - 208
  • [29] HER2 status in hormone receptor positive premenopausal primary breast cancer adds prognostic, but not tamoxifen treatment predictive, information
    Ryden, Lisa
    Landberg, Goran
    Stal, Olle
    Nordenskjold, Bo
    Ferno, Marten
    Bendahl, Par-Ola
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2008, 109 (02) : 351 - 357
  • [30] Differential molecular pathways expression in HER2 positive early breast cancer according to hormone receptor status
    Omarini, Claudia
    Bettelli, Stefania
    Caprera, Cecilia
    Manfredini, Samantha
    Barbolini, Monica
    Moscetti, Luca
    Isca, Chrystel
    Toss, Angela
    Barbieri, Elena
    Cortesi, Laura
    Kaleci, Shaniko
    Maiorana, Antonino
    Tazzioli, Giovanni
    Cascinu, Stefano
    Piacentini, Federico
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 145 (04) : 821 - 828