Forecasting value-at-risk of crude oil futures using a hybrid ARIMA-SVR-POT model

被引:6
|
作者
Zhang, Chen [1 ]
Zhou, Xinmiao [1 ]
机构
[1] Ningbo Univ, Business Sch, Ningbo 315211, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Forecasting risk; WTI; Value at risk; ARIMA-SVR-POT; Kupiec-test; EXCHANGE-RATE; VOLATILITY; UNCERTAINTY; IMPACT; CAUSALITY; SPILLOVER; RETURNS; EVENTS; PRICES; MARKET;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23358
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Forecasting the value at risk (VaR) of crude oil futures can be a challenging task for investors due to the high volatility of these prices. It is crucial to describe the return in the tail distribution, as extreme values can trigger larger price fluctuations and market risks. In this study, we proposed a hybrid model, ARIMA-SVR-POT, which uses a combination of the autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA), support vector regression (SVR), and peak over threshold (POT) method from the extreme value theory. We compared the performance of our hybrid model with three other models, namely ARIMA-EGARCH, ARIMA-SVR, and ARIMA-EGARCH-POT. We demonstrated the effectiveness of our model using crude oil WTI Futures as a sample from June 23, 2016, to September 30, 2022. Our findings show that the ARIMA-SVR-POT hybrid model provides accurate predictions of the returns and volatility. Furthermore, the model performs exceptionally well in capturing the extreme tail of returns and outperforms the other models. We also conducted back-testing in the proposed model and the results show that the ARIMA-SVR-POT model passed the Kupiec test at confidence levels of 95 %, 99 %, 99.5 %, and 99.9 %. Our proposed model provides a more precise reflection of potential losses when estimating VaR. The predicted loss probability is closer to the actual loss occurrence probability, indicating superior performance compared to traditional statistical models, which enhanced crude oil risk management tools and suggested effective measures to manage market risks.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Is Facebook PROPHET Superior than Hybrid ARIMA Model to Forecast Crude Oil Price?
    Aziz, Mukhriz Izraf Azman
    Barawi, Mohamad Hardyman
    Shahiri, Hazrul
    SAINS MALAYSIANA, 2022, 51 (08): : 2633 - 2643
  • [32] Estimating and forecasting portfolio's Value-at-Risk with wavelet-based extreme value theory: Evidence from crude oil prices and US exchange rates
    Jammazi, Rania
    Duc Khuong Nguyen
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2017, 68 (11) : 1352 - 1362
  • [33] Clearing margin system in the futures markets - Applying the value-at-risk model to Taiwanese data
    Chiu, Chien-Liang
    Chiang, Shu-Mei
    Hung, Jui-Cheng
    Chen, Yu-Lung
    PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2006, 367 : 353 - 374
  • [34] Forecasting Bitcoin Volatility and Value-at-Risk Using Stacking Machine Learning Models With Intraday Data
    Pourrezaee, Arash
    Hajizadeh, Ehsan
    COMPUTATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2024,
  • [35] Forecasting value-at-risk and expected shortfall of cryptocurrency using range-based copula method
    Kar, Tapan
    Meka, Sesha
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2025,
  • [36] Value-at-risk forecasting based on Gaussian mixture ARMA-GARCH model
    Lee, Sangyeol
    Lee, Taewook
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL COMPUTATION AND SIMULATION, 2011, 81 (09) : 1131 - 1144
  • [37] Portfolio value-at-risk estimation in energy futures markets with time-varying copula-GARCH model
    Lu, Xun Fa
    Lai, Kin Keung
    Liang, Liang
    ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2014, 219 (01) : 333 - 357
  • [38] Crude oil price analysis and forecasting using wavelet decomposed ensemble model
    He, Kaijian
    Yu, Lean
    Lai, Kin Keung
    ENERGY, 2012, 46 (01) : 564 - 574
  • [39] Oil price forecasting using a hybrid model
    Safari, Ali
    Davallou, Maryam
    ENERGY, 2018, 148 : 49 - 58
  • [40] Forecasting the volatility of crude oil futures using high-frequency data: further evidence
    Ma, Feng
    Wei, Yu
    Chen, Wang
    He, Feng
    EMPIRICAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 55 (02) : 653 - 678