Forecasting value-at-risk of crude oil futures using a hybrid ARIMA-SVR-POT model

被引:6
|
作者
Zhang, Chen [1 ]
Zhou, Xinmiao [1 ]
机构
[1] Ningbo Univ, Business Sch, Ningbo 315211, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Forecasting risk; WTI; Value at risk; ARIMA-SVR-POT; Kupiec-test; EXCHANGE-RATE; VOLATILITY; UNCERTAINTY; IMPACT; CAUSALITY; SPILLOVER; RETURNS; EVENTS; PRICES; MARKET;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23358
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Forecasting the value at risk (VaR) of crude oil futures can be a challenging task for investors due to the high volatility of these prices. It is crucial to describe the return in the tail distribution, as extreme values can trigger larger price fluctuations and market risks. In this study, we proposed a hybrid model, ARIMA-SVR-POT, which uses a combination of the autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA), support vector regression (SVR), and peak over threshold (POT) method from the extreme value theory. We compared the performance of our hybrid model with three other models, namely ARIMA-EGARCH, ARIMA-SVR, and ARIMA-EGARCH-POT. We demonstrated the effectiveness of our model using crude oil WTI Futures as a sample from June 23, 2016, to September 30, 2022. Our findings show that the ARIMA-SVR-POT hybrid model provides accurate predictions of the returns and volatility. Furthermore, the model performs exceptionally well in capturing the extreme tail of returns and outperforms the other models. We also conducted back-testing in the proposed model and the results show that the ARIMA-SVR-POT model passed the Kupiec test at confidence levels of 95 %, 99 %, 99.5 %, and 99.9 %. Our proposed model provides a more precise reflection of potential losses when estimating VaR. The predicted loss probability is closer to the actual loss occurrence probability, indicating superior performance compared to traditional statistical models, which enhanced crude oil risk management tools and suggested effective measures to manage market risks.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Data driven value-at-risk forecasting using a SVR-GARCH-KDE hybrid
    Lux, Marius
    Haerdle, Wolfgang Karl
    Lessmann, Stefan
    COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS, 2020, 35 (03) : 947 - 981
  • [2] Data driven value-at-risk forecasting using a SVR-GARCH-KDE hybrid
    Marius Lux
    Wolfgang Karl Härdle
    Stefan Lessmann
    Computational Statistics, 2020, 35 : 947 - 981
  • [3] Forecasting crude oil price volatility and value-at-risk: Evidence from historical and recent data
    Lux, Thomas
    Segnon, Mawuli
    Gupta, Rangan
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2016, 56 : 117 - 133
  • [4] Measuring Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall of crude oil portfolio using extreme value theory and vine copula
    Yu, Wenhua
    Yang, Kun
    Wei, Yu
    Lei, Likun
    PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2018, 490 : 1423 - 1433
  • [5] Value-at-risk estimation of crude oil price using MCA based transient risk modeling approach
    He, Kaijian
    Lai, Kin Keung
    Yen, Jerome
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2011, 33 (05) : 903 - 911
  • [6] Forecasting Value-at-Risk using Maximum Entropy Density
    Chan, Felix
    18TH WORLD IMACS CONGRESS AND MODSIM09 INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON MODELLING AND SIMULATION: INTERFACING MODELLING AND SIMULATION WITH MATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCES, 2009, : 1377 - 1383
  • [7] Forecasting Crude Oil Risk Using a Multivariate Multiscale Convolutional Neural Network Model
    Zou, Yingchao
    He, Kaijian
    MATHEMATICS, 2022, 10 (14)
  • [8] Forecasting volatility of crude oil futures using a GARCH-RNN hybrid approach
    Verma, Sauraj
    INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS IN ACCOUNTING FINANCE & MANAGEMENT, 2021, 28 (02): : 130 - 142
  • [9] Forecasting crude oil futures using an ensemble model including investor sentiment and attention
    Yao, Xiying
    Yang, Xuetao
    KYBERNETES, 2024, 53 (12) : 6114 - 6138
  • [10] Forecasting value-at-risk in oil prices in the presence of volatility shifts
    Ewing, Bradley T.
    Malik, Farooy
    Anjum, Hassan
    REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 37 (03) : 341 - 350