Deep learning to estimate gestational age from fly-to cineloop videos: A novel approach to ultrasound quality control

被引:3
作者
Viswanathan, Ambika V. [1 ]
Pokaprakarn, Teeranan [1 ,2 ]
Kasaro, Margaret P. [1 ,3 ]
Shah, Hina R. [4 ]
Prieto, Juan C. [4 ]
Benabdelkader, Chiraz [1 ]
Sebastiao, Yuri V. [1 ]
Sindano, Ntazana [3 ]
Stringer, Elizabeth [1 ,3 ]
Stringer, Jeffrey S. A. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Carolina Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[3] UNC Global Projects Zambia LLC, Lusaka, Zambia
[4] Univ North Carolina Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, Chapel Hill, NC USA
关键词
artificial intelligence; biometry; deep learning; gestational age; quality control; ultrasound; CARE;
D O I
10.1002/ijgo.15321
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective Low-cost devices have made obstetric sonography possible in settings where it was previously unfeasible, but ensuring quality and consistency at scale remains a challenge. In the present study, we sought to create a tool to reduce substandard fetal biometry measurement while minimizing care disruption. Methods We developed a deep learning artificial intelligence (AI) model to estimate gestational age (GA) in the second and third trimester from fly-to cineloops-brief videos acquired during routine ultrasound biometry-and evaluated its performance in comparison to expert sonographer measurement. We then introduced random error into fetal biometry measurements and analyzed the ability of the AI model to flag grossly inaccurate measurements such as those that might be obtained by a novice. Results The mean absolute error (MAE) of our model (+/- standard error) was 3.87 +/- 0.07 days, compared to 4.80 +/- 0.10 days for expert biometry (difference -0.92 days; 95% CI: -1.10 to -0.76). Based on simulated novice biometry with average absolute error of 7.5%, our model reliably detected cases where novice biometry differed from expert biometry by 10 days or more, with an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.92, 0.95), sensitivity of 81.0% (95% CI: 77.9, 83.8), and specificity of 89.9% (95% CI: 88.1, 91.5). These results held across a range of sensitivity analyses, including where the model was provided suboptimal truncated fly-to cineloops. Conclusions Our AI model estimated GA more accurately than expert biometry. Because fly-to cineloop videos can be obtained without any change to sonographer workflow, the model represents a no-cost guardrail that could be incorporated into both low-cost and commercial ultrasound devices to prevent reporting of most gross GA estimation errors.
引用
收藏
页码:1013 / 1021
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2022, Business Wire
  • [2] [Anonymous], WHO RECOMMENDATIONS
  • [3] SonoNet: Real-Time Detection and Localisation of Fetal Standard Scan Planes in Freehand Ultrasound
    Baumgartner, Christian F.
    Kamnitsas, Konstantinos
    Matthew, Jacqueline
    Fletcher, Tara P.
    Smith, Sandra
    Koch, Lisa M.
    Kainz, Bernhard
    Rueckert, Daniel
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2017, 36 (11) : 2204 - 2215
  • [4] The use of portable ultrasound devices in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of the literature
    Becker, Dawn M.
    Tafoya, Chelsea A.
    Becker, Soeren L.
    Kruger, Grant H.
    Tafoya, Matthew J.
    Becker, Torben K.
    [J]. TROPICAL MEDICINE & INTERNATIONAL HEALTH, 2016, 21 (03) : 294 - 311
  • [5] Quality control of ultrasound for fetal biometry: results from the INTERGROWTH-21st Project
    Cavallaro, A.
    Ash, S. T.
    Napolitano, R.
    Wanyonyi, S.
    Ohuma, E. O.
    Molloholli, M.
    Sande, J.
    Sarris, I.
    Ioannou, C.
    Norris, T.
    Donadono, V.
    Carvalho, M.
    Purwar, M.
    Barros, F. C.
    Jaffer, Y. A.
    Bertino, E.
    Pang, R.
    Gravett, M. G.
    Salomon, L. J.
    Noble, J. A.
    Altman, D. G.
    Papageorghiou, A. T.
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 52 (03) : 332 - 339
  • [6] Utilization of focused antenatal care in Zambia: examining individual- and community-level factors using a multilevel analysis
    Chama-Chiliba, Chitalu M.
    Koch, Steven F.
    [J]. HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING, 2015, 30 (01) : 78 - 87
  • [7] Transfer Learning with Convolutional Neural Networks for Classification of Abdominal Ultrasound Images
    Cheng, Phillip M.
    Malhi, Harshawn S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2017, 30 (02) : 234 - 243
  • [8] Implementation of the Zambia Electronic Perinatal Record System for comprehensive prenatal and delivery care
    Chi, Benjamin H.
    Vwalika, Bellington
    Killam, William P.
    Wamalume, Chibesa
    Giganti, Mark J.
    Mbewe, Reuben
    Stringer, Elizabeth M.
    Chintu, Namwinga T.
    Putta, Nande B.
    Liu, Katherine C.
    Chibwesha, Carla J.
    Rouse, Dwight J.
    Stringer, Jeffrey S. A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2011, 113 (02) : 131 - 136
  • [9] ISUOG Practice Guidelines: ultrasound assessment of fetal biometry and growth
    Salomon L.J.
    Alfirevic Z.
    Da Silva Costa F.
    Deter R.L.
    Figueras F.
    Ghi T.
    Glanc P.
    Khalil A.
    Lee W.
    Napolitano R.
    Papageorghiou A.
    Sotiradis A.
    Stirnemann J.
    Toi A.
    Yeo G.
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 53 (06) : 715 - 723
  • [10] Ginsburg AS., 2023, SCI REP-UK, V13, P1