共 50 条
Agreement of antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Pasteurella multocida and Mannheimia haemolytica isolates from preweaned dairy calves with bovine respiratory disease
被引:1
|作者:
Credille, Brent C.
[1
]
Capik, Sarah F.
[2
,3
]
Credille, Allison
[1
]
Crossley, Beate M.
[4
]
Blanchard, Pat
[4
]
Woolums, Amelia R.
[5
]
Lehenbauer, Terry W.
[6
,7
]
机构:
[1] Univ Georgia, Coll Vet Med, Dept Populat Hlth, Food Anim Hlth & Management Program, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ Syst, Texas A&M AgriLife Res, Amarillo, TX USA
[3] Texas A&M Univ, Coll Vet Med & Biomed Sci, Dept Vet Pathobiol, College Stn, TX USA
[4] Univ Calif Davis, Calif Anim Hlth & Food Safety Lab Syst, Davis, CA USA
[5] Mississippi State Univ, Coll Vet Med, Dept Pathobiol & Populat Med, Mississippi State, MS USA
[6] Univ Calif Davis, Vet Med Teaching & Res Ctr, Sch Vet Med, Tulare, CA USA
[7] Univ Calif Davis, Sch Vet Med, Dept Populat Hlth & Reprod, Davis, CA USA
关键词:
antimicrobial resistance;
pneumonia;
nasal swab;
nasopharyngeal swab;
transtracheal wash;
bronchoalveolar lavage;
HIGH-RISK;
BACTERIAL-FLORA;
RESISTANCE;
PREVALENCE;
CATTLE;
NASAL;
CULTURE;
SWABS;
D O I:
10.2460/ajvr.23.06.0140
中图分类号:
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号:
0906 ;
摘要:
OBJECTIVEEvaluate agreement among the antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of Mannheimia haemolytica or Pasteurella mul-tocida obtained by transtracheal wash, nasal swab, nasopharyngeal swab, and bronchoalveolar lavage.ANIMALS100 Holstein and Holstein-cross bull calves with bovine respiratory disease.METHODSCalves > 30 days old with naturally occurring bovine respiratory disease were sampled sequentially by nasal swab, nasopharyngeal swab, transtracheal wash, and then bronchoalveolar lavage. Samples were cultured, and for each antimicrobial, the MIC of 50% and 90% of isolates was calculated, and isolates were categorized as susceptible or not. Categorical discrepancies were recorded. Percent positive agreement and kappa values were calculated between isolates for each of the sampling methods.RESULTSAntimicrobial susceptibility varied by pathogen and resistance to enrofloxacin, florfenicol, tilmicosin, and spec- tinomycin was detected. Minor discrepancies were seen in up to 29% of classifications, with enrofloxacin, penicillin, and florfenicol more frequently represented than other drugs. Very major and major discrepancies were seen when comparing florfenicol (1.9%) and tulathromycin (3.8 to 4.9%) across sampling methods. Some variability was seen in agreement for enrofloxacin for several comparisons (8.3 to 18.4%).
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文