Impella devices: a comprehensive review of their development, use, and impact on cardiogenic shock and high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention

被引:2
|
作者
Fishkin, Tzvi [1 ,2 ]
Isath, Ameesh [2 ,3 ]
Naami, Edmund [1 ,2 ]
Aronow, Wilbert S. S. [2 ,3 ]
Levine, Avi [2 ,3 ]
Gass, Alan [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Westchester Med Ctr, Dept Med, Valhalla, NY USA
[2] New York Med Coll, Valhalla, NY 10595 USA
[3] Westchester Med Ctr, Dept Cardiol, Valhalla, NY 10595 USA
关键词
Impella; mechanical circulatory support; cardiogenic shock; high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention; heart failure; MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT; EXTRACORPOREAL MEMBRANE-OXYGENATION; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL; VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE; INTRAAORTIC BALLOON PUMP; MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; CARDIAC POWER; FEASIBILITY; PREDICTORS; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1080/14779072.2023.2244874
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IntroductionImpella devices have emerged as a critical tool for temporary mechanical circulatory support (TMCS) in the management of cardiogenic shock (CS) and high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). The purpose of this review is to examine the history of the different Impella devices, their hemodynamic profiles, and how the data supports their use.Areas CoveredThis review covers the development and specifications of the Impella 2.5, Impella CP, Impella 5.0/Left Direct (LD), Impella RP, and Impella 5.5 devices. This review also covers the clinical trials that illuminate the Impella devices' use in their appropriate clinical contexts. These studies examine the effectiveness of Impella devices and have begun to yield promising results, demonstrating improved survival rates when compared to the historically high mortality rates associated with CS. It is important to weigh the benefits of Impella devices in light of their contraindications. A literature search was conducted by searching the PubMed database for reviews, meta-analyses, and clinical trials pertinent to Impella devices.Expert OpinionImpella devices are a crucial tool for management of patients undergoing high-risk PCI and those with CS. There is evidence that early Impella implantation is beneficial in the treatment of patients presenting with CS. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to better elucidate the benefits of Impella devices in various clinical settings.
引用
收藏
页码:613 / 620
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices for High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Subrata Kar
    Current Cardiology Reports, 2018, 20
  • [32] Deploying Mechanical Circulatory Support Via the Axillary Artery in Cardiogenic Shock and High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Kajy, Marvin
    Laktineh, Amir
    Blank, Nimrod
    Tayal, Raj
    Tanveer, Syed
    Mohamad, Tamam
    Elder, Mahir
    Schreiber, Theodore
    Kaki, Amir
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 128 : 127 - 133
  • [33] Percutaneous temporary ventricular assistance systems for cardiogenic shock and high-risk percutaneous coronary revascularization: systematic literature review
    Negro, Antonella
    Pecoraro, Valentina
    Camerlingo, Maria Domenica
    Maltoni, Susanna
    GIORNALE ITALIANO DI CARDIOLOGIA, 2020, 21 (02) : 128 - 137
  • [34] The Impact of Age in Patients Undergoing Impella-Assisted High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: It Gets Complicated
    Bimal, Tia
    Ukrani, Janta
    Fishbein, Joanna
    Selim, Samy
    Gandotra, Puneet
    Ong, Lawrence
    Gruberg, Luis
    CIRCULATION, 2023, 148
  • [35] Immediate Use of Impella CP for High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention After Repair of Thrombosed Aortic Coarctation
    Jimenez-Rodriguez, Gian Manuel
    Garcia-Montes, Jose Antonio
    Lidt, Guering Eid
    Solis-Jimenez, Fabio
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2025, 105 (03) : 618 - 623
  • [36] Complex High-Risk Indicated Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Prophylactic Use of the Impella CP Ventricular Assist Device
    van den Buijs, Deborah M. F.
    van den Brink, Floris S.
    Wilgenhof, Adriaan
    Zivelonghi, Carlo
    Verouden, Niels
    Knaapen, Paul
    Sjauw, Krischan D.
    Vermeersch, Paul
    Nap, Alex
    JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 34 (09): : E665 - E671
  • [37] Hemodynamic support with the Impella acute 100 in patients with cardiogenic chock, or high-risk coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)
    J Dens
    B Meyens
    J Maessen
    V van Ommen
    E Grübe
    Critical Care, 8 (Suppl 1):
  • [38] Use of Impella Recover LP 2.5 in elective high risk percutaneous coronary intervention
    Luis Ferreiro, Jose
    Antoni Gomez-Hospital, Joan
    Cequier, Angel R.
    Angiolillo, Dominick J.
    Roura, Gerard
    Teruel, Luis
    Maristany, Jaume
    Gomez-Lara, Josep
    Jara, Francesc
    Bass, Theodore A.
    Esplugas, Enric
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 145 (02) : 235 - 237
  • [39] Utilization of Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction and High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Interventions
    Asleh, Rabea
    Resar, Jon R.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2019, 8 (08)
  • [40] The Impact of Age in Patients Undergoing Impella- Assisted High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Age Is Not Just a Number
    Bhuiyan, Md
    Bimal, Tia
    Badar, Faraz
    Fishbein, Joanna
    Roy, Juby
    Ukrani, Janta
    Gandotra, Puneet
    Selim, Samy
    Ong, Lawrence
    Gruberg, Luis
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 82 (17) : B47 - B47