Impella devices: a comprehensive review of their development, use, and impact on cardiogenic shock and high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention

被引:2
|
作者
Fishkin, Tzvi [1 ,2 ]
Isath, Ameesh [2 ,3 ]
Naami, Edmund [1 ,2 ]
Aronow, Wilbert S. S. [2 ,3 ]
Levine, Avi [2 ,3 ]
Gass, Alan [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Westchester Med Ctr, Dept Med, Valhalla, NY USA
[2] New York Med Coll, Valhalla, NY 10595 USA
[3] Westchester Med Ctr, Dept Cardiol, Valhalla, NY 10595 USA
关键词
Impella; mechanical circulatory support; cardiogenic shock; high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention; heart failure; MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT; EXTRACORPOREAL MEMBRANE-OXYGENATION; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL; VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE; INTRAAORTIC BALLOON PUMP; MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; CARDIAC POWER; FEASIBILITY; PREDICTORS; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1080/14779072.2023.2244874
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IntroductionImpella devices have emerged as a critical tool for temporary mechanical circulatory support (TMCS) in the management of cardiogenic shock (CS) and high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). The purpose of this review is to examine the history of the different Impella devices, their hemodynamic profiles, and how the data supports their use.Areas CoveredThis review covers the development and specifications of the Impella 2.5, Impella CP, Impella 5.0/Left Direct (LD), Impella RP, and Impella 5.5 devices. This review also covers the clinical trials that illuminate the Impella devices' use in their appropriate clinical contexts. These studies examine the effectiveness of Impella devices and have begun to yield promising results, demonstrating improved survival rates when compared to the historically high mortality rates associated with CS. It is important to weigh the benefits of Impella devices in light of their contraindications. A literature search was conducted by searching the PubMed database for reviews, meta-analyses, and clinical trials pertinent to Impella devices.Expert OpinionImpella devices are a crucial tool for management of patients undergoing high-risk PCI and those with CS. There is evidence that early Impella implantation is beneficial in the treatment of patients presenting with CS. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to better elucidate the benefits of Impella devices in various clinical settings.
引用
收藏
页码:613 / 620
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A SUCCESSFUL USE OF IMPELLA IN HIGH-RISK PRIMARY PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION IN PATIENT WITH CRITICAL AORTIC STENOSIS
    Tan, Jian Liang
    Patel, Rahul
    Raza, Muhammad
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 73 (09) : 2222 - 2222
  • [22] Use of the Impella 2.5 for prophylactic circulatory support during elective high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention
    Alasnag, Mirvat A.
    Gardi, Delair O.
    Elder, Mahir
    Kannam, Hari
    Ali, Farhan
    Petrina, Mircea
    Kheterpal, Vipin
    Hout, Mariah S.
    Schreiber, Theodore L.
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2011, 12 (05) : 299 - 303
  • [23] Impella Versus Non-Impella for High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Institutional Cohort Comparison
    Reddy, Pavan
    Merdler, Ilan
    Zhang, Cheng
    Cellamare, Matteo
    Ben-Dor, Itsik
    Rogers, Toby
    Satler, Lowell
    Waksman, Ron
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2023, 16 (04) : S23 - S23
  • [24] Percutaneous Circulatory Assist Devices for High-Risk Coronary Intervention
    Myat, Aung
    Patel, Niket
    Tehrani, Shana
    Banning, Adrian P.
    Redwood, Simon R.
    Bhatt, Deepak L.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2015, 8 (02) : 229 - 244
  • [25] Advancing Impella Utilization in cardiogenic shock and high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions: Optimizing patient outcomes through evidence-based strategies and comprehensive training
    Lau, Fung Ming
    Ho, Mu-Hsing
    Li, Wai Chi Polly
    INTENSIVE AND CRITICAL CARE NURSING, 2025, 89
  • [26] High-risk percutaneous coronary intervention using the intracardiac microaxial pump 'Impella Recover'
    Ramondo, Angelo
    Napodano, Massimo
    Tarantini, Giuseppe
    Calzolari, Diego
    Nalli, Chiara
    Cacciavillani, Luisa
    Iliceto, Sabino
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2006, 7 (02) : 149 - 152
  • [27] Observational, multicenter registry of Impella-assisted high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions and cardiogenic shock in Poland (IMPELLA-PL): efficacy and safety outcomes
    Pietrasik, A.
    Gasecka, A.
    Sacha, J.
    Pawlowski, T.
    Grygier, M.
    Bielawski, G.
    Sukiennik, A.
    Witkowski, A.
    Bartus, S.
    Cacko, A.
    Gil, R.
    Kuliczkowski, W.
    Wanczura, P.
    Legutko, J.
    Kochman, J.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2023, 44
  • [28] Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention
    Engstrom, Annemarie E.
    Piek, Jan J.
    Henriques, Jose P. S.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF CARDIOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2010, 8 (09) : 1247 - 1255
  • [29] Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices for High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Kar, Subrata
    CURRENT CARDIOLOGY REPORTS, 2018, 20 (01)
  • [30] Supported High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With the Impella 2.5 Device The Europella Registry
    Sjauw, Krischan D.
    Konorza, Thomas
    Erbel, Raimund
    Danna, Paolo L.
    Viecca, Maurizio
    Minden, Hans-Heinrich
    Butter, Christian
    Engstrom, Thomas
    Hassager, Christian
    Machado, Francisco P.
    Pedrazzini, Giovanni
    Wagner, Daniel R.
    Schamberger, Rainer
    Kerber, Sebastian
    Mathey, Detlef G.
    Schofer, Joachim
    Engstrom, Annemarie E.
    Henriques, Jose P. S.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 54 (25) : 2430 - 2434