Impella devices: a comprehensive review of their development, use, and impact on cardiogenic shock and high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention

被引:2
|
作者
Fishkin, Tzvi [1 ,2 ]
Isath, Ameesh [2 ,3 ]
Naami, Edmund [1 ,2 ]
Aronow, Wilbert S. S. [2 ,3 ]
Levine, Avi [2 ,3 ]
Gass, Alan [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Westchester Med Ctr, Dept Med, Valhalla, NY USA
[2] New York Med Coll, Valhalla, NY 10595 USA
[3] Westchester Med Ctr, Dept Cardiol, Valhalla, NY 10595 USA
关键词
Impella; mechanical circulatory support; cardiogenic shock; high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention; heart failure; MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT; EXTRACORPOREAL MEMBRANE-OXYGENATION; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL; VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE; INTRAAORTIC BALLOON PUMP; MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; CARDIAC POWER; FEASIBILITY; PREDICTORS; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1080/14779072.2023.2244874
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IntroductionImpella devices have emerged as a critical tool for temporary mechanical circulatory support (TMCS) in the management of cardiogenic shock (CS) and high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). The purpose of this review is to examine the history of the different Impella devices, their hemodynamic profiles, and how the data supports their use.Areas CoveredThis review covers the development and specifications of the Impella 2.5, Impella CP, Impella 5.0/Left Direct (LD), Impella RP, and Impella 5.5 devices. This review also covers the clinical trials that illuminate the Impella devices' use in their appropriate clinical contexts. These studies examine the effectiveness of Impella devices and have begun to yield promising results, demonstrating improved survival rates when compared to the historically high mortality rates associated with CS. It is important to weigh the benefits of Impella devices in light of their contraindications. A literature search was conducted by searching the PubMed database for reviews, meta-analyses, and clinical trials pertinent to Impella devices.Expert OpinionImpella devices are a crucial tool for management of patients undergoing high-risk PCI and those with CS. There is evidence that early Impella implantation is beneficial in the treatment of patients presenting with CS. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to better elucidate the benefits of Impella devices in various clinical settings.
引用
收藏
页码:613 / 620
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impella support for cardiogenic shock and high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: A single-center experience
    Brandao, Mariana
    Caeiro, Daniel
    Pires-Morais, Gustavo
    Almeida, Joao Goncalves
    Teixeira, Pedro Goncalves
    Silva, Marisa Passos
    Ponte, Marta
    Dias, Adelaide
    Oliveira, Marco
    Rodrigues, Alberto
    Braga, Pedro
    REVISTA PORTUGUESA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2021, 40 (11) : 853 - 861
  • [2] Use of the Impella 2.5 in High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    McCulloch, Brenda
    CRITICAL CARE NURSE, 2011, 31 (01) : E1 - E16
  • [3] Secular Trend in the Use and Implementation of Impella in High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Cardiogenic Shock: A Real-World Experience
    Hritani, Abdul Wahab
    Wani, Adil S.
    Olet, Susan
    Lauterbach, Claire J.
    Allaqaband, Suhail Q.
    Bajwa, Tanvir
    Jan, M. Fuad
    JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 31 (09): : E265 - E270
  • [4] Timing of Impella implantation and outcomes in cardiogenic shock or high-risk percutaneous coronary revascularization
    Tarantini, Giuseppe
    Masiero, Giulia
    Burzotta, Francesco
    Pazzanese, Vittorio
    Briguori, Carlo
    Trani, Carlo
    Piva, Tommaso
    De Marco, Federico
    Di Biasi, Maurizio
    Pagnotta, Paolo
    Mojoli, Marco
    Casu, Gavino
    Giustino, Gennaro
    Lorenzoni, Giulia
    Montorfano, Matteo
    Ancona, Marco B.
    Pappalardo, Federico
    Chieffo, Alaide
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2021, 98 (02) : E222 - E234
  • [5] The Use of Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Device in High-risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Cardiogenic Shock
    Akhondi, Andre Babak
    Lee, Michael S.
    REVIEWS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2013, 14 (2-4) : E144 - E149
  • [6] The role of Impella in high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention
    Moura-Ferreira, Sara
    Ladeiras-Lopes, Ricardo
    MBala, Domingas
    Rodrigues, Alberto
    Braga, Pedro
    Gama, Vasco
    REVISTA PORTUGUESA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2018, 37 (07)
  • [7] An unexpected complication after impella use for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention
    Roccasalva, Fausto
    Cannata, Francesco
    Chiarito, Mauro
    Pellegrino, Marta
    Pagnotta, Paolo
    Lancini, Damiano Regazzoli
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL SUPPLEMENTS, 2019, 21 (0J) : J105 - J105
  • [8] Sex, Age, and Shock: Impella-Assisted High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Bimal, T.
    Fishbein, J.
    Miklin, D.
    Gandotra, P.
    Omar, W.
    Ong, L.
    Gruberg, L.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2024, 17 (04) : S3 - S3
  • [9] A Review of Bleeding Risk with Impella-supported High-risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Vetrovec, George W.
    Kaki, Amir
    Dahle, Thom G.
    HEART INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 14 (02): : 92 - 99
  • [10] Routine Usage of Impella for High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    O'Neill, William W.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2025, 239 : 18 - 19