Risk factors and conservative therapy outcomes of anastomotic leakage after gastrectomy: Experience of 3,926 patients from a single gastric surgical unit

被引:3
|
作者
He, Zhongyuan [1 ]
Liu, Hongda [1 ]
Zhou, Ling [2 ]
Li, Qingya [1 ]
Wang, Linjun [1 ]
Zhang, Diancai [1 ]
Xu, Hao [1 ]
Xu, Zekuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Gen Surg, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Anesthesiol & Perioperat Med, Nanjing, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2023年 / 13卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
gastric cancer; anastomotic leakage; gastrectomy; complication; laparoscopic approach; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; ASSISTED GASTRECTOMY; ROBOTIC GASTRECTOMY; CONTRAST SWALLOW; CANCER; ESOPHAGECTOMY; COMPLICATIONS; MANAGEMENT; MORTALITY; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2023.1163463
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundAnastomotic leakage (AL) after gastrectomy is one of the severest postoperative complications and is related to increasing mortality. In addition, no consensus guidelines about strategies of AL treatment have been established. This large cohort study aimed to inspect the risk factors and efficacy of the conservative treatment for AL in patients with gastric cancer. MethodsWe reviewed the clinicopathological data of 3,926 gastric cancer patients undergoing gastrectomy between 2014 and 2021. Results contained the rate, risk factors, and conservative therapy outcomes of AL. ResultsIn total, 80 patients (2.03%, 80/3,926) were diagnosed with AL, and esophagojejunostomy was the most frequent AL site (73.8%, 59/80). Among them, one patient (2.5%, 1/80) died. Multivariate analysis indicated that low albumin concentration (P = 0.001), presence of diabetes (P = 0.025), laparoscopic method (P < 0.001), total gastrectomy (P = 0.003), and proximal gastrectomy (P = 0.002) were predicting factors for AL. The closure rate for the conservative treatment of AL in the first month after AL diagnosis was 83.54% (66/79), and the median time from leakage diagnosis to the closure of leakage was 17 days (interquartile range 11-26 days). Low level of plasma albumin (P = 0.004) was associated with late leakage closures. In terms of 5-year overall survival, no significant difference was observed between patients with and without AL. ConclusionThe incidence of AL after gastrectomy is associated with low albumin concentration, diabetes, the laparoscopic method, and extent of resection. The conservative treatment is relatively safe and effective for the AL management in patients after gastric cancer surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [11] Short-term outcomes of a new gastrointestinal decompression tube combined with conservative treatment in patients with esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage after total gastrectomy
    Wang, Sun-Jian
    Duan, Qing
    Xue, Yun-Jing
    She, Li-Lan
    Xia, Yu
    Lin, Ju-Li
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 37 (03): : 1799 - 1805
  • [12] Risk factors for esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage after curative total gastrectomy combined with D2 lymph node dissection for gastric cancer
    Xing, Jiadi
    Liu, Maoxing
    Qi, Xinyu
    Yu, Jianhong
    Fan, Yingcong
    Xu, Kai
    Gao, Pin
    Tan, Fei
    Yao, Zhendan
    Zhang, Nan
    Yang, Hong
    Zhang, Chenghai
    Cui, Ming
    Su, Xiangqian
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 49 (03)
  • [13] Pancreatic Anastomotic Leakage after Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Risk factors, Clinical predictors, and Management (Single Center Experience)
    El Nakeeb, Ayman
    Salah, Tarek
    Sultan, Ahmad
    El Hemaly, Mohamed
    Askr, Waleed
    Ezzat, Helmy
    Hamdy, Emad
    Atef, Ehab
    El Hanafy, Ehab
    El-Geidie, Ahmed
    Wahab, Mohamed Abdel
    Abdallah, Talaat
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 37 (06) : 1405 - 1418
  • [14] Short-term outcomes of a new gastrointestinal decompression tube combined with conservative treatment in patients with esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage after total gastrectomy
    Sun-Jian Wang
    Qing Duan
    Yun-Jing Xue
    Li-Lan She
    Yu Xia
    Ju-Li Lin
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2023, 37 : 1799 - 1805
  • [15] Trends in clinical outcomes and long-term survival after robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a single high-volume center experience of consecutive 2000 patients
    Seohee Choi
    Jeong Ho Song
    Sejin Lee
    Minah Cho
    Yoo Min Kim
    Hyoung-Il Kim
    Woo Jin Hyung
    Gastric Cancer, 2022, 25 : 275 - 286
  • [16] Trends in clinical outcomes and long-term survival after robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a single high-volume center experience of consecutive 2000 patients
    Choi, Seohee
    Song, Jeong Ho
    Lee, Sejin
    Cho, Minah
    Kim, Yoo Min
    Kim, Hyoung-Il
    Hyung, Woo Jin
    GASTRIC CANCER, 2022, 25 (01) : 275 - 286
  • [17] Peritonitis from peg tube insertion in surgical intensive care unit patients: identification of risk factors and clinical outcomes
    Shah, Rachit D.
    Tariq, Nabil
    Shanley, Charles
    Robbins, James
    Janczyk, Randy
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2009, 23 (11): : 2580 - 2586
  • [18] Reply to: Letter to Roh CK et al. 'Incidence and treatment outcomes of leakage after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Experience of 14,075 patients from a large volume centre'
    Roh, Chul Kyu
    Hyung, Woo Jin
    EJSO, 2021, 47 (09): : 2470 - 2471
  • [19] Endoscopic Vacuum-Assisted Closure Therapy in Patients with Anastomotic Leakage after Esophagectomy: A Single-Center Experience
    Noh, Soo Min
    Ahn, Ji Yong
    Lee, Jeong Hoon
    Jung, Hwoon-Yong
    AlGhamdi, Zeead
    Kim, Hyeong Ryul
    Kim, Yong-Hee
    GASTROENTEROLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2018, 2018
  • [20] Risk factors affecting unplanned reoperation after laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: experience from a high-volume center
    Li, Ping
    Huang, Chang-Ming
    Tu, Ru-Hong
    Lin, Jian-Xian
    Lu, Jun
    Zheng, Chao-Hui
    Xie, Jian-Wei
    Wang, Jia-Bin
    Chen, Qi-Yue
    Cao, Long-Long
    Lin, Mi
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 31 (10): : 3922 - 3931