Measuring and Architecting System Resilience Through Trade Study Analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Veit, Daniel J. [1 ]
Mazzuchi, Thomas A. [1 ]
Sarkani, Shahram [1 ]
机构
[1] George Washington Univ, Dept Engn Management & Syst Engn, Washington, DC 20052 USA
来源
IEEE SYSTEMS JOURNAL | 2023年 / 17卷 / 01期
关键词
Resilience; Measurement; Fault tolerance; Sensitivity analysis; Markov processes; Electric shock; Costs; Autonomous systems; design optimization; resilience; systems engineering; systems system resilience; COMMON-CAUSE; DESIGNING RESILIENT; FRAMEWORK; METRICS; PERFORMANCE; ATTACKS; ENHANCE;
D O I
10.1109/JSYST.2022.3163139
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Resilience is a dimension of trade study analysis that must be accounted for in early conceptual system design because it can influence cost, reliability, performance, and overall lifecycle cost. Traditional trade studies, which focus on risk, safety, and costs aspects analysis are no longer sufficient because they only account for predicted and known disruptions. This article proposes a practical and implementable methodology for measuring, predicting, and architecting system resilience during conceptual design that considers both known and unknown disruptions. This article extends the current literature by motivating the resilience curve using a Markov process, verifying resilience with empirical data, and incorporating the interaction between subsystems using common cause failure with the binomial failure rate. A verified simulation model is used as a predictive analysis tool and applied to an unmanned surface vehicle case study.
引用
收藏
页码:1181 / 1192
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] From Metaphor to Practice: Operationalizing the Analysis of Resilience Using System Dynamics Modelling
    Herrera, Hugo
    SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 2017, 34 (04) : 444 - 462
  • [42] Maintaining Electric System Safety Through An Enhanced Network Resilience
    Dehghanian, Pooria
    Aslan, Semih
    Dehghanian, Payman
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS, 2018, 54 (05) : 4927 - 4937
  • [43] Knowledge map and hotspot analysis in climate resilience infrastructure (CRI) from 1997 to 2022 through scientometric analysis
    Liu, Yijun
    Li, Qin
    Li, Wenlong
    Jia, Lixin
    Pei, Xingwang
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2023, 228
  • [44] Resilience in energy management system: A study case
    Prince, Jesse-James A.
    Haessig, Pierre
    Bourdais, Romain
    Gueguen, Herve
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2019, 52 (04): : 395 - 400
  • [45] Measuring disaster resilience in the Philippines: evidence using network data envelopment analysis
    Villano, Renato A.
    Magcale-Macandog, Damasa B.
    Acosta, Lilibeth A.
    Tran, Carolyn-Dung Thi Thanh
    Eugenio, Elena A.
    Macandog, Paula Beatrice M.
    CLIMATE AND DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 12 (01) : 67 - 79
  • [46] Practitioner approaches to measuring community resilience: The analysis of the resilience of communities to disasters toolkit
    Clark-Ginsberg, Aaron
    McCaul, Bernard
    Bremaud, Isabelle
    Caceres, Gabriela
    Mpanje, Desire
    Patel, Sonny
    Patel, Ronak
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2020, 50
  • [47] Active distribution system resilience quantification and enhancement through multi-microgrid and mobile energy storage
    Mishra, Dillip Kumar
    Ghadi, Mojtaba Jabbari
    Li, Li
    Zhang, Jianfeng
    Hossain, M. J.
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2022, 311
  • [48] From social context and resilience to performance through job satisfaction: A multilevel study over time
    Meneghel, Isabella
    Borgogni, Laura
    Miraglia, Mariella
    Salanova, Marisa
    Martinez, Isabel M.
    HUMAN RELATIONS, 2016, 69 (11) : 2047 - 2067
  • [49] Measuring Household Resilience to Floods: a Case Study in the Vietnamese Mekong River Delta
    Nguyen, Kien V.
    James, Helen
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2013, 18 (03):
  • [50] Sequential Hazards Resilience of Interdependent Infrastructure System: A Case Study of Greater Toronto Area Energy Infrastructure System
    Kong, Jingjing
    Simonovic, Slobodan P.
    Zhang, Chao
    RISK ANALYSIS, 2019, 39 (05) : 1141 - 1168