Kin affiliation, socio-sexual and mating preference in the female Microtus ochrogaster in a multiple socio-sexual preference test

被引:0
作者
Ferreira-Nuno, Armando [1 ]
Young, Larry J. [2 ]
Otal, Adriana Morales [1 ]
Camacho, Francisco [3 ]
Diaz, Nestor F. [4 ]
Paredes, Raul G. [3 ,5 ]
Prado, Alberto [5 ]
Benites, Antonio Cruz [1 ]
Portillo, Wendy [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Metropolitana Iztapalapa, Dept Biol Reprod, Area Neurociencias, Mexico City, Mexico
[2] Emory Univ, Emory Natl Primate Res Ctr, Silvio O Conte Ctr Oxytocin & Social Cognit, Ctr Translat Social Neurosci,Dept Psychiat & Behav, Atlanta, GA USA
[3] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Inst Neurobiol, Queretaro, Mexico
[4] Inst Nacl Perinatol, Dept Fisiol & Desarrollo Celular, Mexico City, Mexico
[5] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Escuela Nacl Estudios Super, Unidad Juriquilla, Queretaro, Mexico
来源
FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION | 2023年 / 11卷
关键词
prairie voles; socio-sexual preferences; mating preferences; kinship; inbreeding avoidance; huddling; PRAIRIE VOLES; MATE CHOICE; PARTNER PREFERENCE; SOCIAL-ORGANIZATION; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; SIBLING RECOGNITION; COPULATORY-BEHAVIOR; PARENTAL CARE; MONOGAMY; MALES;
D O I
10.3389/fevo.2023.1154800
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Introduction; The prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster) is a socially monogamous species that, after cohabitation with mating, forms an enduring pair bond. It has been suggested that female prairie voles avoid mating with fathers and siblings to prevent inbreeding depression. However, controlled laboratory tests of preferences involving males with varying degree of relatedness have not been conducted.Methods: To address this, we employed a multiple socio-sexual preference arena consisting of four adjacent cylinders arranged in a closed circle. In each cylinder, we placed a male of varying relatedness to the experimental female (i.e., father, sibling, first-degree cousin, and unrelated males) and registered their behavior for five hours. Male socio-sexual preference was determined by the proportion of time spent in each male's chamber, which can be driven by affiliative preferences for the father and sibling and sexual attraction for the cousin and unrelated males. Mating preference was analyzed as the frequency of mating with each male. We hypothesized that receptive females would show sexual attraction and mating preferences for the unrelated males and cousins and affiliative preferences for the fathers and siblings.Results: Our analyses showed that females spent more time with first-degree cousins and mated more often with them compared to unrelated males, siblings, or fathers. However, complete inbreeding avoidance was not observed, and some females mated with siblings, fathers, or both.Discussion: Although our results did not support the hypothesis, they are consistent with other studies that have argued that mating with first-degree cousins optimizes the costs and benefits associated with inbreeding and outbreeding.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 73 条
  • [1] Evaluation of two automated metrics for analyzing partner preference tests
    Ahern, Todd H.
    Modi, Meera E.
    Burkett, James P.
    Young, Larry J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2009, 182 (02) : 180 - 188
  • [2] The prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster):: an animal model for behavioral neuroendocrine research on pair bonding
    Aragona, BJ
    Wang, ZX
    [J]. ILAR JOURNAL, 2004, 45 (01) : 35 - 45
  • [3] Aschemeier L. M., 2008, J. Young Investigators, V18
  • [4] KIN RECOGNITION AND MATE CHOICE IN MICE - THE EFFECTS OF KINSHIP, FAMILIARITY AND SOCIAL INTERFERENCE ON INTERSEXUAL INTERACTION
    BARNARD, CJ
    FITZSIMONS, J
    [J]. ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1988, 36 : 1078 - 1090
  • [5] PREFERENCES FOR COUSINS IN JAPANESE QUAIL
    BATESON, P
    [J]. NATURE, 1982, 295 (5846) : 236 - 237
  • [6] Beery AK, 2021, CURR PROTOC, V1, DOI 10.1002/cpz1.173
  • [7] Reproductive performance as a function of inbreeding in prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster)
    Bixler, Andrea
    Tang-Martinez, Zuleyma
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY, 2006, 87 (05) : 944 - 949
  • [8] The Monogamy Paradox: What Do Love and Sex Have to Do With It?
    Carter, C. Sue
    Perkeybile, Allison M.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2018, 6
  • [9] CARTER CS, 1995, NEUROSCI BIOBEHAV R, V19, P303
  • [10] MONOGAMY AND THE PRAIRIE VOLE
    CARTER, CS
    GETZ, LL
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, 1993, 268 (06) : 100 - 106