Predicting Human Decision-Making for Task Selection in Manufacturing: A Systematic Literature Review

被引:0
作者
Herrmann, Jan-Phillip [1 ]
Tackenberg, Sven [1 ]
Nitsch, Verena [2 ]
机构
[1] OWL Univ Appl Sci & Arts, Dept Prod Engn & Wood Technol, D-32657 Lemgo, Germany
[2] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Inst Ind Engn & Ergon, D-52062 Aachen, Germany
关键词
Decision making; Manufacturing; Databases; Task analysis; Predictive models; Search problems; Data collection; Artificial intelligence; Quality assurance; assistance system; human decision-making; manufacturing; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; SIMULATION; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3340626
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Predicting human decisions is a central challenge for planning and controlling production with weakly structured processes. Thus, workers' decisions regarding the processing strategies and the temporal sequence of tasks to be processed are to be determined prospectively. Accordingly, there is a need to review methods for preference elicitation to develop individual predictive decision models. This paper presents a systematic literature review and discussion of 42 publications on predictive decision models and decision attributes. Methods for eliciting decision-making knowledge from manufacturing workers as part of the modeling process and decision model validation methods are reviewed and discussed in light of their predictive validity for individual task selection. The article synthesizes the recent literature for predicting human decision-making in manufacturing using artificial intelligence methods. Along with the review results, a future research agenda is proposed for modeling and simulating human decision-making in manufacturing. Knowledge about human preferences and the successful prediction of workers' decision-making in manufacturing helps companies predict manufacturing objectives and derive organizational and work design measures.
引用
收藏
页码:141172 / 141191
页数:20
相关论文
共 58 条
  • [1] Assuring the Machine Learning Lifecycle: Desiderata, Methods, and Challenges
    Ashmore, Rob
    Calinescu, Radu
    Paterson, Colin
    [J]. ACM COMPUTING SURVEYS, 2021, 54 (05)
  • [2] Balke T., 2014, How Do Agents Make Decisions? A Survey
  • [3] Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
    Barredo Arrieta, Alejandro
    Diaz-Rodriguez, Natalia
    Del Ser, Javier
    Bennetot, Adrien
    Tabik, Siham
    Barbado, Alberto
    Garcia, Salvador
    Gil-Lopez, Sergio
    Molina, Daniel
    Benjamins, Richard
    Chatila, Raja
    Herrera, Francisco
    [J]. INFORMATION FUSION, 2020, 58 : 82 - 115
  • [4] A Survey on Digital Twin: Definitions, Characteristics, Applications, and Design Implications
    Barricelli, Barbara Rita
    Casiraghi, Elena
    Fogli, Daniela
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 : 167653 - 167671
  • [5] Behnke G., 2017, PROC INT C COMPANION, P1
  • [6] Emulation of control strategies through machine learning in manufacturing simulations
    Bergmann, S.
    Feldkamp, N.
    Strassburger, S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SIMULATION, 2017, 11 (01) : 38 - 50
  • [7] Bergmann S, 2011, 2011 IEEE WORKSHOP ON PRINCIPLES OF ADVANCED AND DISTRIBUTED SIMULATION (PADS)
  • [8] APPRENTICING WITH THE CUSTOMER
    BEYER, HR
    HOLTZBLATT, K
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 1995, 38 (05) : 45 - 52
  • [9] Beyond PICO: The SPIDER Tool for Qualitative Evidence Synthesis
    Cooke, Alison
    Smith, Debbie
    Booth, Andrew
    [J]. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2012, 22 (10) : 1435 - 1443
  • [10] Behavioral causes of the bullwhip effect and the observed value of inventory information
    Croson, R
    Donohue, K
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2006, 52 (03) : 323 - 336