Quantum Annealing with Inequality Constraints: The Set Cover Problem

被引:0
作者
Djidjev, Hristo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Los Alamos Natl Lab, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA
[2] Bulgarian Acad Sci, Inst Informat & Commun Technol, Ul Acad G Bonchev Bl 25A, Sofia 1113, Bulgaria
关键词
augmented Lagrangian method; constrained optimization; D-Wave; higher-order binary optimization; Ising problem; quadratic penalty method; quantum annealing; quadratic unconstrained binary optimization; set cover problem; ALGORITHMS;
D O I
10.1002/qute.202300104
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
Quantum annealing is a promising method for solving hard optimization problems by transforming them into quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) problems. However, when constraints are involved, particularly multiple inequality constraints, incorporating them into the objective function poses challenges. In this paper, the authors present two novel approaches for solving problems with multiple inequality constraints on a quantum annealer and apply them to the set cover problem (SCP). The first approach uses the augmented Lagrangian method to represent the constraints, while the second approach employs a higher-order binary optimization (HUBO) formulation. The experiments show that both approaches outperform the standard approach for solving the SCP on the D-Wave Advantage quantum annealer. The HUBO formulation performs slightly better than the augmented Lagrangian method in solving the SCP, but its scalability in terms of embeddability in the quantum chip is worse. The results demonstrate that the proposed augmented Lagrangian and HUBO methods can successfully implement a large number of inequality constraints, making them applicable to a broad range of constrained problems beyond the SCP. Quantum annealing is a promising method for solving hard optimization problems if they can be formulated as quadratic unconstrained binary optimization problems. Most problems of practical interest do include constraints, however, and this paper proposes two methods for dealing with multiple inequality constraints that are more accurate than the existing ones, and applies them to the set cover problem.image
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Feedback Arc Set Problem with Triangle Inequality Is a Vertex Cover Problem
    Mastrolilli, Monaldo
    LATIN 2012: THEORETICAL INFORMATICS, 2012, 7256 : 556 - 567
  • [2] Automaton-Based Methodology for Implementing Optimization Constraints for Quantum Annealing
    Djidjev, Hristo
    17TH ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING FRONTIERS 2020 (CF 2020), 2020, : 118 - 125
  • [3] Reducing quantum annealing biases for solving the graph partitioning problem
    Pelofske, Elijah
    Hahn, Georg
    Djidjev, Hristo N.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 18TH ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING FRONTIERS 2021 (CF 2021), 2021, : 133 - 139
  • [4] Logical qubit implementation for quantum annealing: augmented Lagrangian approach
    Djidjev, Hristo N.
    QUANTUM SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 8 (03)
  • [5] SOLVING THE SET COVER PROBLEM ON A SUPERCOMPUTER
    SHYU, SJ
    LEE, RCT
    PARALLEL COMPUTING, 1990, 13 (03) : 295 - 300
  • [6] Applying the Hubbard-Stratonovich Transformation to Solve Scheduling Problems Under Inequality Constraints With Quantum Annealing
    Yu, Sizhuo
    Nabil, Tahar
    FRONTIERS IN PHYSICS, 2021, 9
  • [7] Quantum Annealing and the Satisfiability Problem
    Pudenz, Kristen L.
    Tallant, Gregory S.
    Belote, Todd R.
    Adachi, Steven H.
    NEW FRONTIERS IN HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING AND BIG DATA, 2017, 30 : 253 - 260
  • [8] Enhancing quantum annealing performance for the molecular similarity problem
    Hernandez, Maritza
    Aramon, Maliheh
    QUANTUM INFORMATION PROCESSING, 2017, 16 (05)
  • [9] Enhancing quantum annealing performance for the molecular similarity problem
    Maritza Hernandez
    Maliheh Aramon
    Quantum Information Processing, 2017, 16
  • [10] An effective algorithm for the minimum set cover problem
    Zhang, Pei
    Wang, Rong-Long
    Wu, Chong-Guang
    Okazaki, Kozo
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2006 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING AND CYBERNETICS, VOLS 1-7, 2006, : 3032 - +