Outcomes Associated With Esophageal Perforation Management

被引:3
|
作者
Veziant, Julie [1 ]
Boudis, Fabio [2 ]
Lenne, Xavier [2 ]
Bruandet, Amelie [2 ]
Eveno, Clarisse [1 ,3 ]
Nuytens, Frederiek [4 ]
Piessen, Guillaume [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] CHU Lille, Claude Huriez Hosp, Dept Digest & Oncol Surg, Lille, France
[2] Lille Univ Hosp, Dept Med Informat, Lille, France
[3] Univ Lille, CHU Lille, Canc Heterogene Plast & Resistance Therapies, CNRS,Inserm,UMR9020,U1277,CANTHER, F-59000 Lille, France
[4] AZ Groeninge Hosp, Dept Digest & Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, Kortrijk, Belgium
关键词
cohort study; esophageal perforation; morbidity; mortality; QUALITY; REPAIR; STENTS; COHORT;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0000000000006048
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective:To evaluate outcomes associated with esophageal perforation (EP) management at a national level and determine predictive factors of 90-day mortality (90dM), failure-to-rescue (FTR), and major morbidity (MM, Clavien-Dindo 3-4).Background:EP remains a challenging clinical emergency. Previous population-based studies showed rates of 90dM up to 38.8% but were outdated or small-sized.Methods:Data from patients admitted to hospitals with EP were extracted from the French medico-administrative database (2012-2021). Etiology, management strategies, and short and long-term outcomes were analyzed. A cutoff value of the annual EP management caseload affecting FTR was determined using the "Chi-squared Automatic Interaction Detector" method. Random effects logistic regression model was performed to assess independent predictors of 90dM, FTR, and MM.Results:Among 4765 patients with EP, 90dM and FTR rates were 28.0% and 19.4%, respectively. Both remained stable during the study period. EP was spontaneous in 68.2%, due to esophageal cancer in 19.7%, iatrogenic postendoscopy in 7.3%, and due to foreign body ingestion in 4.7%. Primary management consisted of surgery (n = 1447,30.4%), endoscopy (n = 590,12.4%), isolated drainage (n = 336,7.0%), and conservative management (n = 2392,50.2%). After multivariate analysis, besides age and comorbidity, esophageal cancer was predictive of both 90dM and FTR. An annual threshold of >= 8 EP managed annually was associated with a reduced 90dM and FTR rate. In France, only some university hospitals fulfilled this condition. Furthermore, primary surgery was associated with a lower 90dDM and FTR rate despite an increase in MM.Conclusions:We provide evidence for the referral of EP to high-volume centers with multidisciplinary expertise. Surgery remains an effective treatment for EP.
引用
收藏
页码:709 / 716
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Clinical analysis of the diagnosis and treatment of esophageal perforation
    Okumura, Hiroshi
    Uchikado, Yasuto
    Kita, Yoshiaki
    Omoto, Itaru
    Hayashi, Naoki
    Matsumoto, Masataka
    Sasaki, Ken
    Setoyama, Tetsuro
    Arigami, Takaaki
    Uenosono, Yoshikazu
    Matsushita, Daisuke
    Desaki, Ryosuke
    Noda, Masahiro
    Higo, Naotomo
    Okubo, Keishi
    Urata, Masakazu
    Yamasaki, Yoichi
    Owaki, Tetsuhiro
    Ishigami, Sumiya
    Natsugoe, Shoji
    ESOPHAGUS, 2016, 13 (02) : 146 - 150
  • [32] Management of Esophageal and Pharyngeal Perforation as Complications of Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery
    Kang, Moo Sung
    Kim, Kyung Hyun
    Park, Jeong Yoon
    Kuh, Sung Uk
    Chin, Dong Kyu
    Jin, Byung Ho
    Kim, Keun Su
    Cho, Yong Eun
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 102 : 275 - 283
  • [33] Successful management of esophageal perforation due to an aortic arch aneurysm replacement
    Grimminger, P.
    Vallboehmer, D.
    Bludau, M.
    Brabender, J.
    Metzger, R.
    Hoelscher, A. H.
    DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2009, 22 (05): : 471 - 474
  • [34] Esophageal Perforation: Clinical Patterns and Outcomes from a Patient Cohort of Western Norway
    Soreide, Jon Arne
    Konradsson, Andri
    Sandvik, Oddvar M.
    Ovrebo, Kjell
    Viste, Asgaut
    DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2012, 29 (06) : 494 - 502
  • [35] Personal management of 57 consecutive patients with esophageal perforation
    Gupta, NM
    Kaman, L
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2004, 187 (01) : 58 - 63
  • [36] Esophageal perforation: surgical, endoscopic and medical management strategies
    Sepesi, Boris
    Raymond, Daniel P.
    Peters, Jeffrey H.
    CURRENT OPINION IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2010, 26 (04) : 379 - 383
  • [37] Current management of esophageal perforation: 20 years experience
    Eroglu, A.
    Turkyilmaz, A.
    Aydin, Y.
    Yekeler, E.
    Karaoglanoglu, N.
    DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2009, 22 (04) : 374 - 380
  • [38] Management of spontaneous perforation of esophageal cancer with covered self expanding metallic stents
    Ferri, L
    Lee, JKT
    Law, S
    Wong, KH
    Kwok, KF
    Wong, J
    DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2005, 18 (01) : 67 - 69
  • [39] Surgical Management of Esophageal Perforation: Examining Trends in a Multi-Institutional Cohort
    Wong, Lye-Yeng
    Leipzig, Matthew
    Liou, Douglas. Z. Z.
    Backhus, Leah. M. M.
    Lui, Natalie. S. S.
    Shrager, Joseph. B. B.
    Berry, Mark. F. F.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2023, 27 (09) : 1757 - 1765
  • [40] Esophageal perforation associated with noninvasive ventilation - A case report
    van de Louw, A
    Brocas, E
    Boiteau, R
    Perrin-Gachadoat, D
    Tenaillon, A
    CHEST, 2002, 122 (05) : 1857 - 1858