Outcomes Associated With Esophageal Perforation Management

被引:3
|
作者
Veziant, Julie [1 ]
Boudis, Fabio [2 ]
Lenne, Xavier [2 ]
Bruandet, Amelie [2 ]
Eveno, Clarisse [1 ,3 ]
Nuytens, Frederiek [4 ]
Piessen, Guillaume [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] CHU Lille, Claude Huriez Hosp, Dept Digest & Oncol Surg, Lille, France
[2] Lille Univ Hosp, Dept Med Informat, Lille, France
[3] Univ Lille, CHU Lille, Canc Heterogene Plast & Resistance Therapies, CNRS,Inserm,UMR9020,U1277,CANTHER, F-59000 Lille, France
[4] AZ Groeninge Hosp, Dept Digest & Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, Kortrijk, Belgium
关键词
cohort study; esophageal perforation; morbidity; mortality; QUALITY; REPAIR; STENTS; COHORT;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0000000000006048
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective:To evaluate outcomes associated with esophageal perforation (EP) management at a national level and determine predictive factors of 90-day mortality (90dM), failure-to-rescue (FTR), and major morbidity (MM, Clavien-Dindo 3-4).Background:EP remains a challenging clinical emergency. Previous population-based studies showed rates of 90dM up to 38.8% but were outdated or small-sized.Methods:Data from patients admitted to hospitals with EP were extracted from the French medico-administrative database (2012-2021). Etiology, management strategies, and short and long-term outcomes were analyzed. A cutoff value of the annual EP management caseload affecting FTR was determined using the "Chi-squared Automatic Interaction Detector" method. Random effects logistic regression model was performed to assess independent predictors of 90dM, FTR, and MM.Results:Among 4765 patients with EP, 90dM and FTR rates were 28.0% and 19.4%, respectively. Both remained stable during the study period. EP was spontaneous in 68.2%, due to esophageal cancer in 19.7%, iatrogenic postendoscopy in 7.3%, and due to foreign body ingestion in 4.7%. Primary management consisted of surgery (n = 1447,30.4%), endoscopy (n = 590,12.4%), isolated drainage (n = 336,7.0%), and conservative management (n = 2392,50.2%). After multivariate analysis, besides age and comorbidity, esophageal cancer was predictive of both 90dM and FTR. An annual threshold of >= 8 EP managed annually was associated with a reduced 90dM and FTR rate. In France, only some university hospitals fulfilled this condition. Furthermore, primary surgery was associated with a lower 90dDM and FTR rate despite an increase in MM.Conclusions:We provide evidence for the referral of EP to high-volume centers with multidisciplinary expertise. Surgery remains an effective treatment for EP.
引用
收藏
页码:709 / 716
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Management of late cervical esophageal perforation
    Chen, Ming
    Ling, Yi
    Yang, Beibei
    ULUSAL TRAVMA VE ACIL CERRAHI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF TRAUMA & EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2010, 16 (06): : 511 - 515
  • [22] Interpleural analgesia in the management of esophageal perforation
    Main, A
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA, 1997, 22 (02) : 185 - 187
  • [23] Management of Esophageal Perforation in 120 Consecutive Patients: Clinical Impact of a Structured Treatment Algorithm
    Lindenmann, Joerg
    Matzi, Veronika
    Neuboeck, Nicole
    Anegg, Udo
    Maier, Alfred
    Smolle, Josef
    Smolle-Juettner, Freyja Maria
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2013, 17 (06) : 1036 - 1043
  • [24] Evolving Management Strategies in Esophageal Perforation: Surgeons Using Nonoperative Techniques to Improve Outcomes
    Kuppusamy, Madhan Kumar
    Hubka, Michal
    Felisky, Chance D.
    Carrott, Philip
    Kline, Elizabeth M.
    Koehler, Richard P.
    Low, Donald E.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2011, 213 (01) : 164 - 171
  • [25] Management of Esophageal Perforation: Experience from a Tertiary Center in India
    Amudhan, Anbalagan
    Rajendran, Shanmugasundaram
    Raj, Vellayudham Vimal
    Rajarathinam, Govindhasamy
    Jyotibasu, D.
    Ravichandran, Palanisamy
    Jeswanth, Satyanesan
    Balachandar, Tirupporur Govindaswamy
    Kannan, Devy Gounder
    Surendran, Rajagopal
    DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2009, 26 (04) : 322 - 328
  • [26] Management and Outcomes of Esophageal Perforation: A National Study of 2,564 Patients in England
    Markar, Sheraz R.
    Mackenzie, Hugh
    Wiggins, Tom
    Askari, Alan
    Faiz, Omar
    Zaninotto, Giovanni
    Hanna, George B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 110 (11) : 1559 - 1566
  • [27] Esophageal stenting for spontaneous esophageal perforation
    Koivukangas, Vesa
    Biancari, Fausto
    Merilainen, Sanna
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2012, 73 (04) : 1011 - 1013
  • [28] Esophageal Perforation: Principles of Diagnosis and Surgical Management
    Markus Huber-Lang
    Doris Henne-Bruns
    Bernd Schmitz
    Peter Wuerl
    Surgery Today, 2006, 36 : 332 - 340
  • [29] Management of iatrogenic esophageal perforation with endoscopic stenting
    Zakary, Nawaf
    Elsheikh, Alguili
    Hamid, Noof
    Hamid, Hind
    Alghamdi, Mohammed
    Farah, Walid
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2014, 29 : 15 - 15
  • [30] Esophageal perforation: Principles of diagnosis and surgical management
    Huber-Lang, M
    Henne-Bruns, D
    Schmitz, B
    Wuerl, P
    SURGERY TODAY, 2006, 36 (04) : 332 - 340