Outcomes Associated With Esophageal Perforation Management

被引:3
|
作者
Veziant, Julie [1 ]
Boudis, Fabio [2 ]
Lenne, Xavier [2 ]
Bruandet, Amelie [2 ]
Eveno, Clarisse [1 ,3 ]
Nuytens, Frederiek [4 ]
Piessen, Guillaume [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] CHU Lille, Claude Huriez Hosp, Dept Digest & Oncol Surg, Lille, France
[2] Lille Univ Hosp, Dept Med Informat, Lille, France
[3] Univ Lille, CHU Lille, Canc Heterogene Plast & Resistance Therapies, CNRS,Inserm,UMR9020,U1277,CANTHER, F-59000 Lille, France
[4] AZ Groeninge Hosp, Dept Digest & Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, Kortrijk, Belgium
关键词
cohort study; esophageal perforation; morbidity; mortality; QUALITY; REPAIR; STENTS; COHORT;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0000000000006048
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective:To evaluate outcomes associated with esophageal perforation (EP) management at a national level and determine predictive factors of 90-day mortality (90dM), failure-to-rescue (FTR), and major morbidity (MM, Clavien-Dindo 3-4).Background:EP remains a challenging clinical emergency. Previous population-based studies showed rates of 90dM up to 38.8% but were outdated or small-sized.Methods:Data from patients admitted to hospitals with EP were extracted from the French medico-administrative database (2012-2021). Etiology, management strategies, and short and long-term outcomes were analyzed. A cutoff value of the annual EP management caseload affecting FTR was determined using the "Chi-squared Automatic Interaction Detector" method. Random effects logistic regression model was performed to assess independent predictors of 90dM, FTR, and MM.Results:Among 4765 patients with EP, 90dM and FTR rates were 28.0% and 19.4%, respectively. Both remained stable during the study period. EP was spontaneous in 68.2%, due to esophageal cancer in 19.7%, iatrogenic postendoscopy in 7.3%, and due to foreign body ingestion in 4.7%. Primary management consisted of surgery (n = 1447,30.4%), endoscopy (n = 590,12.4%), isolated drainage (n = 336,7.0%), and conservative management (n = 2392,50.2%). After multivariate analysis, besides age and comorbidity, esophageal cancer was predictive of both 90dM and FTR. An annual threshold of >= 8 EP managed annually was associated with a reduced 90dM and FTR rate. In France, only some university hospitals fulfilled this condition. Furthermore, primary surgery was associated with a lower 90dDM and FTR rate despite an increase in MM.Conclusions:We provide evidence for the referral of EP to high-volume centers with multidisciplinary expertise. Surgery remains an effective treatment for EP.
引用
收藏
页码:709 / 716
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Esophageal intramural pseudodiverticulosis associated with esophageal perforation
    Murakami, M
    Tsuchiya, K
    Ichikawa, H
    Kawaguchi, K
    Sugiyama, A
    Ishida, K
    Chisuwa, H
    Kawasaki, S
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2000, 35 (09) : 702 - 705
  • [12] Acute Management of Esophageal Perforation
    Mavroudis, Constantine D.
    Kucharczuk, John C.
    CURRENT SURGERY REPORTS, 2014, 2 (01):
  • [13] Esophageal intramural pseudodiverticulosis associated with esophageal perforation
    Maki Murakami
    Katsumi Tsuchiya
    Hideyuki Ichikawa
    Kenji Kawaguchi
    Atsushi Sugiyama
    Kimitaka Ishida
    Hisanao Chisuwa
    Seiji Kawasaki
    Journal of Gastroenterology, 2000, 35 : 702 - 711
  • [14] A 4-year single-center experience in the management of esophageal perforation
    Sari, Serkan
    Bektas, Hasan
    Ulusan, Kivilcim
    Kocak, Burak
    Gurbulak, Bunyamin
    Colak, Sukru
    Cakar, Ekrem
    Ulusan, Melis Baykara
    ULUSAL TRAVMA VE ACIL CERRAHI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF TRAUMA & EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2019, 25 (01): : 39 - 45
  • [15] Minimally invasive surgical management of spontaneous esophageal perforation (Boerhaave’s syndrome)
    Jessie A. Elliott
    Louise Buckley
    Mohamed Albagir
    Antonios Athanasiou
    Thomas J. Murphy
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2019, 33 : 3494 - 3502
  • [16] Management of Esophageal Perforation and Anastomotic Leak by Transluminal Drainage
    Williams, Robert N.
    Hall, Andrew W.
    Sutton, Christopher D.
    Ubhi, Sukhbir S.
    Bowrey, David J.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2011, 15 (05) : 777 - 781
  • [17] Esophageal perforation in eosinophilic esophagitis: A systematic review on clinical presentation, management and outcomes
    Arias-Gonzalez, Laura
    Rey-Iborra, Esther
    Ruiz-Ponce, Miriam
    Laserna-Mendieta, Emilio J.
    Arias, Angel
    Lucendo, Alfredo J.
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2020, 52 (03) : 245 - 252
  • [18] Outcomes in the Management of Esophageal Cancer
    Paul, Subroto
    Altorki, Nasser
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 110 (05) : 599 - 610
  • [19] The Management of Esophageal Perforation: A Systematic Review
    Shaqran, Tariq M.
    Engineer, Rawan
    Abdalla, Esra M.
    Alamoudi, Abdulrahman A.
    Almahdi, Reham
    Aldhahri, Ahmed
    Alghamdi, Afyaa M.
    Abufarea, Bashair M.
    Almutairi, Ruyuf F.
    Al-Suliman, Ali A.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (07)
  • [20] Neonatal esophageal perforation: nonoperative management
    Hesketh, Anthony J.
    Behr, Christopher A.
    Soffer, Samuel Z.
    Hong, Andrew R.
    Glick, Richard D.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2015, 198 (01) : 1 - 6