Neuromarketing and decision-making: Classification of consumer preferences based on changes analysis in the EEG signal of brain regions

被引:13
|
作者
Ouzir, Mounir [1 ]
Lamrani, Houda Chakir [2 ]
Bradley, Rachel L. [3 ]
El Moudden, Ismail [3 ]
机构
[1] High Inst Nursing Profess & Hlth Tech, ISPITS Beni Mellal, Beni Mellal, Morocco
[2] EMAA Business Sch, Ave Moulay Hassan I, Agadir 80020, Morocco
[3] Eastern Virginia Med Sch, Norfolk, VA USA
关键词
Neuromarketing; Decision-making; Consumer preference; EEG; Classification; RESPONSES;
D O I
10.1016/j.bspc.2023.105469
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Neuromarketing involves the study of brain responses that focuses on understanding how consumers' brains respond to products and services, and how these responses influence their choice. Evidence suggests that electroencephalography (EEG) can provide valuable insight into consumer preferences and decision-making processes. This study aims is to assess the relative importance of right/left brain regions (including hemispheres, frontal, temporal, parietal, and occipital lobes) in the consumer choice towards E-commerce products. Also, this study aims to distinguishes the EEG characteristics of consumers' preference using a classification system.Using a publicly available EEG neuromarketing dataset, the change in EEG signals has been evaluated by a mixed model for repeated measures for all brain regions. Four classification algorithms (k-Nearest Neighbor, Random Forest, Neural Network, and Gradient Boosting) were used to distinguish like and dislike preferences.Greater EEG activity in the right hemisphere, right parietal, right occipital, and left occipital was related to like responses. Except for both sides of the temporal lobe, all the subdivisions of the brain considered showed a significant decrease of activity at 4000 ms for like-related responses. However, no significant change in the activity was related to the dislike response. The highest AUC of the four classifiers used was as follows: 76.61% for the right parietal lobe with Neural Network, 75.33% for the left parietal lobe with Gradient Boosting, 73.55% for the right frontal lobe with k-Nearest Neighbor and 72.62% for the right frontal lobe with Random Forest. Considering the significant difference between like and dislike responses at 4000 ms, Neural Network showed the best performance followed by Gradient Boosting.Our framework suggests that the formation of preferences (like and dislike) requires different patterns of brain activity and that Neural Network and Gradient Boosting are valuable tools for distinguishing consumer preference.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Decision-making based on sustainability analysis using GREENSCOPE
    Dias, Ricardo N.
    Filipe, Rui M.
    Matos, Henrique A.
    CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2024, 26 (03) : 755 - 770
  • [32] Decision-Making Analysis Based on Fuzzy Graph Structures
    Koam, Ali N. A.
    Akram, Muhammad
    Liu, Peide
    MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2020, 2020
  • [33] Advice Utilization in Combined Human-Algorithm Decision-Making: An Analysis of Preferences and Behaviors
    Sachin, Panda Kumar
    Schecter, Aaron
    JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2024, 25 (06): : 1439 - 1465
  • [34] Evaluating ambivalence: social-cognitive and affective brain regions associated with ambivalent decision-making
    Nohlen, Hannah U.
    van Harreveld, Frenk
    Rotteveel, Mark
    Lelieveld, Gert-Jan
    Crone, Eveline A.
    SOCIAL COGNITIVE AND AFFECTIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 9 (07) : 924 - 931
  • [35] Representativeness of personality and involvement preferences in a web-based survey on healthcare decision-making
    Birkeland, Soren
    Linkhorst, Thea
    Haakonsson, Anders
    Barry, Michael John
    Moller, Soren
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [36] A valued voice: A qualitative analysis of parental decision-making preferences in emergent paediatric surgery
    Carlisle, Erica M.
    Shinkunas, Laura A.
    Ruba, Emily
    Klipowicz, Caleb J.
    Lieberman, Maxwell T.
    Hoffman, Richard M.
    Reisinger, Heather S.
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2023, 26 (01) : 531 - 541
  • [37] Representativeness of personality and involvement preferences in a web-based survey on healthcare decision-making
    Søren Birkeland
    Thea Linkhorst
    Anders Haakonsson
    Michael John Barry
    Sören Möller
    BMC Health Services Research, 20
  • [38] Intelligent Decision-making Algorithm for Supplier Evaluation Based on Multi-criteria Preferences
    Jemmali, Mahdi
    Alharbi, Mafawez
    Melhim, Loai Kayed B.
    2018 1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER APPLICATIONS & INFORMATION SECURITY (ICCAIS' 2018), 2018,
  • [39] Enhancing EEG-Based Decision-Making Performance Prediction by Maximizing Mutual Information Between Emotion and Decision-Relevant Features
    Wang, Xinyuan
    Wang, Danli
    Gao, Xuange
    Zhao, Yanyan
    Chiu, Steve C.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AFFECTIVE COMPUTING, 2024, 15 (03) : 1228 - 1240
  • [40] Discriminability of single-trial EEG during decision-making of cooperation or aggression: a study based on machine learning
    Huang, Zhihua
    Jiang, Kun
    Li, Jing
    Zhu, Wenxing
    Zheng, Huiru
    Wang, Yiwen
    MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTING, 2022, 60 (08) : 2217 - 2227