Gender heterophily and equality: a contribution to gender equality in the Chilean scientific sector

被引:1
作者
Espinosa-Cristia, Juan Felipe [1 ]
Vega-Munoz, Alejandro [2 ,3 ]
Cerda-Suarez, Luis Manuel [1 ]
Leyton-Johns, Luis [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tecn Federico Santa Maria, Dept Ingn Comercial, Valparaiso, Chile
[2] Univ Cent Chile, Fac Ciencias Salud, Inst Invest & Postgrad, Santiago, Chile
[3] Univ Autonoma Chile, Publ Policy Observ, Santiago, Chile
[4] Univ Andres Bello, Fac Econ & Negocios, Santiago, Chile
关键词
homophily; heterophily; women and science; social sustainability; gender equality; SDG; 5; PATTERNS; COAUTHORSHIP; NETWORKS;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1032291
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Women's insertion or consolidation in science has been thoroughly researched. Such discussion could be particularly relevant concerning sustainable development goal five (SDG 5) on Gender Equality advancement. However, the debate is focused on women percentages inserted into scientific labor, leaving the issue of symbolic experience for women in research unaddressed and with little empirical support. The data come from a survey developed under a FONDECYT project, which studied knowledge production in Chile. Researchers obtained contacts through invitations on social networks such as Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn and databases containing scientists' emails working in Chile. The non-probabilistic sample collected 583 cases, with participants residing in 15 of the 16 country regions. As a result, this document presents the findings of a study on symbolic experience using an instrument to determine whether there are any homophily patterns. It aims to determine if scientists tend to cite others as referents only when they encounter a situation like their own. The findings reveal a clear way scientists estimate the effect of others in terms of their gender homophily. This intervening factor could be crucial in reproducing the disparities and asymmetries that characterize Chile's scientific field.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 64 条
[41]   Polarization in the social sciences: Assortative mixing in social science collaboration networks is resilient to interventions [J].
Leifeld, Philip .
PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2018, 507 :510-523
[42]   Gender homophily and gender distribution in social networks: The case of older adults in long term care settings [J].
Levinson, Maayan ;
Ayalon, Liat ;
Benjamini, Yuval .
SOCIAL NETWORKS, 2022, 71 :70-79
[43]   Further divided gender gaps in research productivity and collaboration during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from coronavirus-related literature [J].
Liu, Meijun ;
Zhang, Ning ;
Hu, Xiao ;
Jaiswal, Ajay ;
Xu, Jian ;
Chen, Hong ;
Ding, Ying ;
Bu, Yi .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2022, 16 (02)
[44]   Collective and individual interdisciplinarity in a sustainability research group: A social network analysis [J].
Locatelli, Bruno ;
Vallet, Ameline ;
Tassin, Jacques ;
Gautier, Denis ;
Chamaret, Aurelie ;
Sist, Plinio .
SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2021, 16 (01) :37-52
[45]  
Labrín SM, 2012, Revista de Estudios de Género La Ventana, V4, P133, DOI 10.32870/lv.v4i35.726
[46]   Simplifying approach to node classification in Graph Neural Networks [J].
Maurya, Sunil Kumar ;
Liu, Xin ;
Murata, Tsuyoshi .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE, 2022, 62
[47]  
McCarty C., 2019, Conducting personal network research: A practical guide
[48]   STEM gender stereotypes from early childhood through adolescence at informal science centers [J].
McGuire, Luke ;
Mulvey, Kelly Lynn ;
Goff, Eric ;
Irvin, Matthew J. ;
Winterbottom, Mark ;
Fields, Grace E. ;
Hartstone-Rose, Adam ;
Rutland, Adam .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 67
[49]   Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks [J].
McPherson, M ;
Smith-Lovin, L ;
Cook, JM .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, 2001, 27 :415-444
[50]  
O'Connor P, 2015, PALGRAVE INTERNATIONAL HANDBOOK OF HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY AND GOVERNANCE, P569